IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/esi/evopap/2012-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social Darwinism

Author

Listed:
  • Naomi Beck

Abstract

"In the distant future I see open fields for far more important researches. . . . Light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history." This statement, which appears in the concluding chapter to the Origin of Species, was Darwin's only mention of human evolution in the entire book. Aware of the difficulties his biological propositions would encounter, Darwin thought it wise to leave the delicate question of human evolution aside for the time being. He was nonetheless fully conscious that his theory would revolutionize the way we think about ourselves and our cultures. Enter social Darwinism. The term has been used mainly to decry doctrines that justify some form of individual, social, or racial superiority through evolutionary principles. Yet many of the positions typically attached to social Darwinism do not correspond to this stereotypical description. Even among the main proponents of evolutionary theory in the nineteenth century - Darwin, Wallace, Huxley, and Spencer - there were important disagreements concerning the process of evolution in humans and its results. This article offers an examination of their claims, as well as some related and antagonistic viewpoints, in two main areas: on the one hand, the debate over wealth distribution and landownership, and on the other, the question of the relationship between evolution and ethics.

Suggested Citation

  • Naomi Beck, 2012. "Social Darwinism," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2012-15, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    • Handle: RePEc:esi:evopap:2012-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://137.248.191.199/RePEc/esi/discussionpapers/2012-15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kropotkin, Petr, 1902. "Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number kropotkin1902.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ignacy SACHS, 2004. "Inclusive development and decent work for all," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 143(1-2), pages 161-184, March.
    2. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2003. "Darwinism and Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 85-97, March.
    3. Glaser-Segura, Daniel & Anghel, Laurentiu-Dan, 2003. "Empirical Study Of Institutions Romania," MPRA Paper 9157, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2002.
    4. Soleri, Daniela & Kleinman, Nathaniel & Newburn, Rebecca, 2021. "Community Seed Groups: Biological and Especially Social Investigations Can Support Crisis Response Capacity," SocArXiv swv47, Center for Open Science.
    5. Frank Moulaert & Jacques Nussbaumer, 2005. "Defining the Social Economy and its Governance at the Neighbourhood Level: A Methodological Reflection," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2071-2088, October.
    6. Tarik Tazdaït & Alejandro Caparros & Jean-Chrsitophe Péreau, 2008. "Mutual Aid: An Indirect Evolution Analysis," Working Papers halshs-00275386, HAL.
    7. Zak, F., 2021. "On some models of altruistic behavior," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 12-52.
    8. Fabiana Liar Agudo & Barbara Stolte Bezerra & José Alcides Gobbo & Luis Alberto Bertolucci Paes, 2022. "Unfolding research themes for industrial symbiosis and underlying theories," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1682-1702, December.
    9. Yan Zhang, 2018. "Crossing the divide: an integrated framework of the commons," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 25-48, June.
    10. Geoffrey Hodgson, 2014. "The evolution of morality and the end of economic man," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 83-106, January.
    11. Roberto Cazzolla Gatti & Roger Koppl & Brian D. Fath & Stuart Kauffman & Wim Hordijk & Robert E. Ulanowicz, 2020. "On the emergence of ecological and economic niches," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 99-127, July.
    12. Benchekroun, Hassan & Long, Ngo Van, 2008. "The build-up of cooperative behavior among non-cooperative selfish agents," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 239-252, July.
    13. Vahabi,Mehrdad, 2019. "The Political Economy of Predation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107591370.
    14. Leonard, Thomas C., 2009. "Origins of the myth of social Darwinism: The ambiguous legacy of Richard Hofstadter's Social Darwinism in American Thought," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 37-51, July.
    15. Oliver, Adam, 2020. "Reviving and revising economic liberalism: an examination in relation to private decisions and public policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103060, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Stefania Proli, 2017. "Carlo Doglio (1914–1995) and the theory and practice of slingshot planning," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 533-556, October.
    17. Takeshi Kato, 2022. "Islamic and capitalist economies: Comparison using econophysics models of wealth exchange and redistribution," Papers 2206.05443, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    18. Jo Rose & Claudia Milena Adler, 2024. "A Framework for Effective Collaboration with Crisis-Affected Communities," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Vandeventer, James Scott & Cattaneo, Claudio & Zografos, Christos, 2019. "A Degrowth Transition: Pathways for the Degrowth Niche to Replace the Capitalist-Growth Regime," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 272-286.
    20. Jácint Farkas & Zoltán Raffay & József Kárpáti & Zsófia Fekete-Frojimovics & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "The Dialectics of (Deep) Accessible Tourism and Reality—Hermeneutics of a Journey to Madrid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:esi:evopap:2012-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christoph Mengs (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vamarde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.