IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/108933.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pairwise likelihood estimation for confirmatory factor analysis models with categorical variables and data that are missing at random

Author

Listed:
  • Katsikatsou, Myrsini
  • Moustaki, Irini
  • Md Jamil, Haziq

Abstract

Methods for the treatment of item non-response in attitudinal scales and in large-scale assessments under the pairwise likelihood (PL) estimation framework and under a missing at random (MAR) mechanism are proposed. Under a full information likelihood estimation framework and MAR, ignorability of the missing data mechanism does not lead to biased estimates. However, this is not the case for pseudo-likelihood approaches such as the PL. We develop and study the performance of three strategies for incorporating missing values into confirmatory factor analysis under the PL framework, the complete-pairs (CP), the available-cases (AC) and the doubly robust (DR) approaches. The CP and AC require only a model for the observed data and standard errors are easy to compute. Doubly-robust versions of the PL estimation require a predictive model for the missing responses given the observed ones and are computationally more demanding than the AC and CP. A simulation study is used to compare the proposed methods. The proposed methods are employed to analyze the UK data on numeracy and literacy collected as part of the OECD Survey of Adult Skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Katsikatsou, Myrsini & Moustaki, Irini & Md Jamil, Haziq, 2022. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for confirmatory factor analysis models with categorical variables and data that are missing at random," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108933, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:108933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/108933/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi, Grace Y. & He, Wenqing & Liang, Hua, 2009. "Analysis of correlated binary data under partially linear single-index logistic models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 278-290, February.
    2. Wai-Yin Poon & Sik-Yum Lee, 1987. "Maximum likelihood estimation of multivariate polyserial and polychoric correlation coefficients," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 409-430, September.
    3. Heejung Bang & James M. Robins, 2005. "Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 962-973, December.
    4. Katsikatsou, Myrsini & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan & Jöreskog, Karl G., 2012. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for factor analysis models with ordinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4243-4258.
    5. de Leon, A.R., 2005. "Pairwise likelihood approach to grouped continuous model and its extension," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 49-57, November.
    6. Katsikatsou, Myrsini & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan & Jöreskog, Karl G., 2012. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for factor analysis models with ordinal data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 43182, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Lee, Sik-Yum & Poon, Wai-Yin & Bentler, P. M., 1990. "Full maximum likelihood analysis of structural equation models with polytomous variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 91-97, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Myrsini Katsikatsou & Irini Moustaki, 2016. "Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1046-1068, December.
    2. Florian Schuberth & Jörg Henseler & Theo K. Dijkstra, 2018. "Partial least squares path modeling using ordinal categorical indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 9-35, January.
    3. Monia Ranalli & Roberto Rocci, 2017. "A Model-Based Approach to Simultaneous Clustering and Dimensional Reduction of Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1007-1034, December.
    4. Battauz, Michela & Vidoni, Paolo, 2022. "A likelihood-based boosting algorithm for factor analysis models with binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Papageorgiou, Ioulia & Moustaki, Irini, 2019. "Sampling of pairs in pairwise likelihood estimation for latent variable models with categorical observed variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87592, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Zhang, Haoran & Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou, 2020. "A note on exploratory item factor analysis by singular value decomposition," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104166, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Haoran Zhang & Yunxiao Chen & Xiaoou Li, 2020. "A Note on Exploratory Item Factor Analysis by Singular Value Decomposition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 358-372, June.
    8. Nuo Xi & Michael W. Browne, 2014. "Contributions to the Underlying Bivariate Normal Method for Factor Analyzing Ordinal Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(6), pages 583-611, December.
    9. Leila Amiri & Mojtaba Khazaei & Mojtaba Ganjali, 2018. "A mixture latent variable model for modeling mixed data in heterogeneous populations and its applications," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(1), pages 95-115, January.
    10. Alexander Robitzsch, 2021. "A Comprehensive Simulation Study of Estimation Methods for the Rasch Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Zachary F. Fisher & Kenneth A. Bollen, 2020. "An Instrumental Variable Estimator for Mixed Indicators: Analytic Derivatives and Alternative Parameterizations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 660-683, September.
    12. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber, 2021. "Modeling human thinking about similarities by neuromatrices in the perspective of fuzzy logic," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/21/09, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    13. Geminiani, Elena & Marra, Giampiero & Moustaki, Irini, 2021. "Single and multiple-group penalized factor analysis: a trust-region algorithm approach with integrated automatic multiple tuning parameter selection," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108873, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Ting Wang & Carolin Strobl & Achim Zeileis & Edgar C. Merkle, 2018. "Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 132-155, March.
    15. Teresa P. Cotrim & Pedro Bem-Haja & Anabela Pereira & Cláudia Fernandes & Rui Azevedo & Samuel Antunes & Joaquim S. Pinto & Flávio Kanazawa & Isabel Souto & Elisabeth Brito & Carlos F. Silva, 2022. "The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Bhat, Chandra R. & Astroza, Sebastian & Bhat, Aarti C. & Nagel, Kai, 2016. "Incorporating a multiple discrete-continuous outcome in the generalized heterogeneous data model: Application to residential self-selection effects analysis in an activity time-use behavior model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 52-76.
    17. Hao Bai & Yuan Zhong & Xin Gao & Wei Xu, 2020. "Multivariate Mixed Response Model with Pairwise Composite-Likelihood Method," Stats, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Guizzardi, Andrea & Stacchini, Annalisa & Costa, Michele, 2020. "Modelling perceived value as a driver of tourism development," MPRA Paper 101245, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Adolfo Esparcia & Joan Guárdia Olmos, 2001. "The Relationship of the Degree of Exposure to a Technological Disaster and Emotional Response: A Structural Model Approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 161-171, May.
    20. Elena Geminiani & Giampiero Marra & Irini Moustaki, 2021. "Single- and Multiple-Group Penalized Factor Analysis: A Trust-Region Algorithm Approach with Integrated Automatic Multiple Tuning Parameter Selection," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 65-95, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    composite likelihood; item non-response; latent variable model; latent variable models; Wiley deal;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:108933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.