IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/1649.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Does Culture Influence Conflict Resolution? A Dynamic Constructive Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Morris, Michael W.

    (Stanford U)

  • Fu, Ho-Ying

Abstract

Psychologists have taken several approaches to modeling how culture influences the ways individuals negotiate interpersonal conflict. Most common has been the approach of searching for cultural traits, general, stable value-orientations that predict a variety of culturally typical conflict resolution behaviors. Increasingly researchers have adopted a constructivist approach of locating the nexus of cultural influence in the knowledge structures that guide negotiators' judgments and decisions. In this paper, we advocate extending the constructivist approach by incorporating principles from social cognition research on knowledge activation. We develop dynamic constructivist hypotheses about how the influence of culture on negotiation is moderated by stimulus or task that the conflict presents, the social context in with the negotiator is embedded, and the negotiator/perceiver's epistemic state.

Suggested Citation

  • Morris, Michael W. & Fu, Ho-Ying, 2000. "How Does Culture Influence Conflict Resolution? A Dynamic Constructive Analysis," Research Papers 1649, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1649.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John L. Graham & Alma T. Mintu & Waymond Rodgers, 1994. "Explorations of Negotiation Behaviors in Ten Foreign Cultures Using a Model Developed in the United States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 72-95, January.
    2. Michael W Morris & Katherine Y Williams & Kwok Leung & Richard Larrick & M Teresa Mendoza & Deepti Bhatnagar & Jianfeng Li & Mari Kondo & Jin-Lian Luo & Jun-Chen Hu, 1998. "Conflict Management Style: Accounting for Cross-National Differences," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 29(4), pages 729-747, December.
    3. Daniel Druckman & Alan A. Benton & Faizunisa Ali & J. Susana Bagur, 1976. "Cultural Differences in Bargaining Behavior," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 20(3), pages 413-452, September.
    4. John L Graham, 1983. "Brazilian, Japanese, and American Business Negotiations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 14(1), pages 47-61, March.
    5. June N P Francis, 1991. "When in Rome? The Effects of Cultural Adaptation on Intercultural Business Negotiations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 22(3), pages 403-428, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khakhar, Priyan & Rammal, Hussain Gulzar, 2013. "Culture and business networks: International business negotiations with Arab managers," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 578-590.
    2. Harich, Katrin R. & LaBahn, Douglas W., 1998. "Enhancing International Business Relationships: A Focus on Customer Perceptions of Salesperson Role Performance Including Cultural Sensitivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 87-101, May.
    3. Junjun Cheng, 2020. "Bidirectional Relationship Progression in Buyer–Seller Negotiations: Evidence from South Korea," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 293-320, April.
    4. Gregory Kersten & Sunil Noronha, 1999. "Negotiation via the World Wide Web: A Cross-cultural Study of Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 251-279, May.
    5. Swee Hoon Ang & Teo, Georgina, 1997. "Effects of time processing orientation, agreement preferences and attitude towards foreign businessmen on negotiation adaptation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(6), pages 625-640, December.
    6. Guy Oliver Faure, 1999. "The Cultural Dimensions of Negotiation: The Chinese Case," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 187-215, May.
    7. Yu-Te Tu, 2012. "A Comparison on Business Negotiation Styles with Education," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 4(6), pages 317-331.
    8. Lillian Y. Fok & Dinah M. Payne & Christy M. Corey, 2016. "Cultural Values, Utilitarian Orientation, and Ethical Decision Making: A Comparison of U.S. and Puerto Rican Professionals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 263-279, March.
    9. Le Nguyen, Huu & Larimo, Jorma & Ali, Tahir, 2016. "How do ownership control position and national culture influence conflict resolution strategies in international joint ventures?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 559-568.
    10. Daniel V. Holland & Dean A. Shepherd, 2013. "Deciding to Persist: Adversity, Values, and Entrepreneurs’ Decision Policies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(2), pages 331-358, March.
    11. Yike Yang, 2021. "Disagreement Strategies on Chinese Forums: Comparing Data From Hong Kong and Mainland China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    12. Shi, Xinping & Wright, Philip C., 2003. "The potential impacts of national feelings on international business negotiations: a study in the China context," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 311-328, June.
    13. Teegen, Hildy, 1998. "Authority and trust in cross border partnerships: Mexican firm perspectives," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 223-239, November.
    14. Costin Lianu & Irina Gabriela Radulescu & Simona Corina Dobre Gudei & Cosmin Lianu & Veronica Mindrescu, 2022. "Cohesion Forces Determinants in Cluster Development: A Study Case for Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, March.
    15. Chonlatis Darawong, 2017. "Conflict Management Styles and Interpersonal Conflict Between Marketing and R&D Personnel During the New Product Development Process," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Ogliastri, Enrique & Quintanilla, Carlos & Benetti, Sara, 2023. "International negotiation prototypes: The impact of culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Vivi Nastase & Sabine Koeszegi & Stan Szpakowicz, 2007. "Content Analysis Through the Machine Learning Mill," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 335-346, July.
    18. Lumineau, Fabrice & Henderson, James, 2012. "The influence of relational experience and contractual governance on the negotiation strategy in buyer-supplier disputes," MPRA Paper 38510, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Kanadlı, Sadi Boĝaç & Torchia, Mariateresa & Gabaldon, Patricia & Calabrò, Andrea, 2020. "Effects of Task Conflict on Board Task Performance in Family Firms: The Importance of Board Openness," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(2).
    20. Nina Pološki Vokić & Sanja Sontor, 2009. "Conflict Management Styles in Croatian Enterprises – The Relationship between Individual Characteristics and Conflict Handling Styles," EFZG Working Papers Series 0905, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.