IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ebg/iesewp/d-1053.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Los consejeros dominicales y la rotación del primer ejecutivo. Evidencias de las empresas cotizadas españolas 2007-2010

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Este trabajo avanza en la investigación sobre la sucesión del CEO, la composición del Consejo de Administración y las redes de consejeros, examinando cómo los consejeros dominicales y la pertenencia a múltiples consejos afectan a la probabilidad de despido del máximo responsable ejecutivo de la compañía. Haciendo uso de una nueva base de datos que cubre todas las sucesiones de CEO ocurridas en las empresas cotizadas españolas durante el periodo 2007-2010, proponemos que los consejeros dominicales pueden incrementar los esfuerzos de supervisión y vigilancia por parte del consejo sobre el CEO, obligándolo a dimitir en situaciones de bajo desempeño. El estudio también aborda la pertenencia a múltiples consejos, ofreciendo evidencias sobre los efectos beneficiosos que esas consejerías proporcionan, ya que permiten acumular experiencia y aprendizaje de primera mano en otras compañías. Las hipótesis se han contrastado longitudinalmente utilizando los datos sobre las sucesiones de CEO tomados de ciento once empresas cotizadas en el mercado continuo en un periodo de cuatro años. Objetivo pedagógico: Sirve como apoyo en clase cuando se discuta sobre los consejos de administración y la evaluación de la gestión del CEO o la alta dirección. Objetivo pedagógico: Sirve como apoyo en clase cuando se discuta sobre los consejos de administración y la evaluación de la gestión del CEO o la alta dirección.

Suggested Citation

  • Stein, Guido & Gallego, Manuel, 2012. "Los consejeros dominicales y la rotación del primer ejecutivo. Evidencias de las empresas cotizadas españolas 2007-2010," IESE Research Papers D/1053, IESE Business School.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-1053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/WP-1053.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    2. Bang Dang Nguyen, 2011. "Ownership Structure and Board Characteristics as Determinants of CEO Turnover in French-Listed Companies," Finance, Presses universitaires de Grenoble, vol. 32(2), pages 53-89.
    3. Denis, David J. & Denis, Diane K. & Sarin, Atulya, 1997. "Ownership structure and top executive turnover," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 193-221, August.
    4. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    5. Main, Brian G M & O'Reilly, Charles A, III & Wade, James, 1993. "Top Executive Pay: Tournament or Teamwork?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(4), pages 606-628, October.
    6. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    7. Mark R. Huson & Robert Parrino & Laura T. Starks, 2001. "Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and CEO Turnover: A Long‐Term Perspective," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(6), pages 2265-2297, December.
    8. Chamu Sundaramurthy & James M. Mahoney & Joseph T. Mahoney, 1997. "Board Structure, Antitakeover Provisions, And Stockholder Wealth," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 231-245, March.
    9. Amy J. Hillman & Christine Shropshire & S. Trevis Certo & Dan R. Dalton & Catherine M. Dalton, 2011. "What I Like About You: A Multilevel Study of Shareholder Discontent with Director Monitoring," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 675-687, June.
    10. Fama, Eugene F, 1980. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(2), pages 288-307, April.
    11. Melinda Muth & Lex Donaldson, 1998. "Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 5-28, January.
    12. Weisbach, Michael S., 1988. "Outside directors and CEO turnover," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 431-460, January.
    13. Ronald W. Masulis & Shawn Mobbs, 2011. "Are All Inside Directors the Same? Evidence from the External Directorship Market," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(3), pages 823-872, June.
    14. Gary A. Ballinger & Jeremy J. Marcel, 2010. "The use of an interim CEO during succession episodes and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 262-283, March.
    15. Denis, David J & Denis, Diane K, 1995. "Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1029-1057, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Voußem & Utz Schäffer & Denis Schweizer, 2015. "Top management turnover under the influence of activist investors," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(3), pages 709-739, August.
    2. Randy Beavers & Shawn Mobbs, 2020. "Director overconfidence," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 49(2), pages 389-422, June.
    3. Ji, Jiao & Talavera, Oleksandr & Yin, Shuxing, 2016. "CEO Dismissal, Compensation and Topics of Board Meetings: The Case of China," MPRA Paper 70232, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Dah, Mustafa A. & Frye, Melissa B. & Hurst, Matthew, 2014. "Board changes and CEO turnover: The unanticipated effects of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 97-108.
    5. Renneboog, L.D.R. & Trojanowski, G., 2002. "The Managerial Labor Market and the Governance Role of Shareholder Control Structures in the UK," Discussion Paper 2002-68, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. ATM Adnan & Nisar Ahmed, 2019. "The Transformation Of The Corporate Governance Model: A Literature Review," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 8(3), pages 7-47.
    7. Elisabeth Dedman, 2003. "Executive turnover in UK firms: the impact of Cadbury," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 33-50.
    8. Isabelle Allemand, 2009. "Analyse des liens entre les départs de dirigeants suite à une mauvaise performance et la création de valeur: une étude menée en France," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 12(2), pages 69-90, June.
    9. Zhou, Gaoguang, 2022. "Good for managers, bad for shareholders? The effects of lone-insider boards on excessive corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 370-383.
    10. Gao, Huasheng & Harford, Jarrad & Li, Kai, 2012. "CEO pay cuts and forced turnover: Their causes and consequences," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 291-310.
    11. Bird, Robert C. & Borochin, Paul A. & Knopf, John D., 2015. "The role of the chief legal officer in corporate governance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-22.
    12. Davide Rizzotti & Claudia Frisenna & Roberta Mazzone, 2017. "The impact of family owners’ monitoring on CEO turnover decisions and the role of trust," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(3), pages 599-621, September.
    13. Michael Firth & Sonia Wong & Yong Yang, 2014. "The double-edged sword of CEO/chairperson duality in corporatized state-owned firms: evidence from top management turnover in China," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(1), pages 207-244, February.
    14. David Hillier & Patrick McColgan, 2008. "An analysis of majority owner‐managed companies in the UK," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(4), pages 603-623, December.
    15. He, Xiaoxiao & Zhu, Margaret Rui, 2020. "Are interim CEOs just caretakers?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Panagiotis Staikouras & Christos Staikouras & Maria-Eleni Agoraki, 2007. "The effect of board size and composition on European bank performance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-27, February.
    17. Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2003. "Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 9(Apr), pages 7-26.
    18. Martin Conyon & Annita Florou, 2002. "Top executive dismissal, ownership and corporate performance," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 209-225.
    19. Volonté, Christophe, 2015. "Boards: Independent and committed directors?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 25-37.
    20. Annita Florou, 2005. "Top Director Shake-up: The Link between Chairman and CEO Dismissal in the UK," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1-2), pages 97-128.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-1053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Noelia Romero (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ienaves.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.