IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eab/develo/22925.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating Agricultural Policy in a Farming System Framework : A Case Study from North West India

Author

Listed:
  • Brajesh Jha

    (IEG)

Abstract

The present study evaluates effect of price, technology and institution-related policies of the Indian government on an average farm in North West India. The present evaluation assumes that with the rationalization of farm input and output prices farmers would adopt suitable technologies under a given institutional framework that will maximize Farmers objective function. A static linear programming-based model that maximizes profit and parameterizes risk has been chosen to present farmers objective function. The model simulates alternate price, technology and institution-related scenarios on an average farm; these scenarios have been compared on the basis of several economic, ecological and social indicators that influence long term-growth of agriculture in the region. Findings suggest that price rationalization alone would not be sufficient for the long-term growth of agriculture in the region; technology and institutions play also an important role.

Suggested Citation

  • Brajesh Jha, 2009. "Evaluating Agricultural Policy in a Farming System Framework : A Case Study from North West India," Development Economics Working Papers 22925, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:eab:develo:22925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eaber.org/node/22925
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. B. R. Hazell, 1971. "A Linear Alternative to Quadratic and Semivariance Programming for Farm Planning under Uncertainty: Reply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 53(4), pages 664-665.
    2. Chopra, Kanchan & Kadekodi, Gopal K., 1998. "Price and Non-Price Response in Agriculture: An Ecological Model of a Region in India," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 53(4), December.
    3. Kumar Jha, Brajesh, 1995. "Trade-off between Return and Risk in Farm Planning: MOTAD and Target MOTAD Approach," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(2).
    4. P. B. R. Hazell, 1971. "A Linear Alternative to Quadratic and Semivariance Programming for Farm Planning under Uncertainty," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 53(1), pages 53-62.
    5. Jha, Brajesh & Mohapatra, B.B., 2003. "Liberalisation and Agricultural Prices: Some Disconcerting Trends," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 58(3), September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderson, Kim B. & Mapp, Harry P., Jr., 1996. "Risk Management Programs In Extension," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-8, July.
    2. Doppler, Werner & Salman, Amer Z. & Al-Karablieh, Emad K. & Wolff, Heinz-Peter, 2002. "The impact of water price strategies on the allocation of irrigation water: the case of the Jordan Valley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 171-182, June.
    3. Timothy J. Lowe & Paul V. Preckel, 2004. "Decision Technologies for Agribusiness Problems: A Brief Review of Selected Literature and a Call for Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 201-208.
    4. Young, Douglas & Lin, William & Pope, Rulon & Robison, Lindon & Selley, Roger, 1979. "Risk Preferences Of Agricultual Producers:Their Measurement And Use," Risk Management in Agriculture: Behavioral, Managerial, and Policy Issues, January 25-26, 1979, San Francisco, California 271459, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    5. King, Robert P. & Robison, Lindon J., 1980. "Implementing Stochastic Dominance With Respect To A Function," Risk Analysis in Agriculture: Research and Educational Developments, January 16-18, 1980, Tucson, Arizona 271563, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    6. Musshoff, Oliver & Hirschauer, Norbert, 2004. "Optimierung unter Unsicherheit mit Hilfe stochastischer Simulation und Genetischer Algorithmen – dargestellt anhand der Optimierung des Produktionsprogramms eines Brandenburger Marktfruchtbetriebes," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 53(07), pages 1-16.
    7. CARPENTIER, Alain & GOHIN, Alexandre & SCKOKAI, Paolo & THOMAS, Alban, 2015. "Economic modelling of agricultural production: past advances and new challenges," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    8. Spielman, Kimberly & Whipple, Glen & McLemore, Dan, 1982. "Estimation Of A Long Run Average Cost Curve Using A Frontier Function: An Application To The Tennessee Livestock Auction Market Industry," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279185, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Bechtel, Amos I. & Young, Douglas L., 1999. "The Importance Of Using Farm Level Risk Estimates In Crp Enrollment Decisions," 1999 Annual Meeting, July 11-14, 1999, Fargo, ND 35717, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    10. Erasmus, Barend & van Jaarsveld, Albert & van Zyl, Johan & Vink, Nick, 2000. "The effects of climate change on the farm sector in the Western Cape," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(4), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Asci, Serhat & VanSickle, John J. & Cantliffe, Daniel J., 2014. "Risk in Investment Decision Making and Greenhouse Tomato Production Expansion in Florida," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, November.
    12. Lence, Sergio H. & Hayes, Dermot J., 1995. "Land Allocation In The Presence Of Estimation Risk," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Lence, Sergio H., 1996. "Relaxing The Assumptions Of Minimum-Variance Hedging," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Vontalge, Alan L., 1991. "A feasibility study of swine producer management cooperatives," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000018168, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Brandao, Elizabeth Santos & McCarl, Bruce A. & Schuh, G. Edward, 1984. "Predicting The Impact Of New Cropping Practices Upon Subsistence Farming: A Farm Level Analysis In Brazil," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Louhichi, Kamel & Flichman, Guillermo & Blanco Fonseca, Maria, 2009. "A generic template for FSSIM," Reports 57463, Wageningen University, SEAMLESS: System for Environmental and Agricultural Modelling; Linking European Science and Society.
    17. Poray, Michael C. & Ginder, Roger, 1997. "Large Scale Closed Cooperative Swine Production Under Uncertainty," ISU General Staff Papers 199701010800001299, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Sylvia, Gilbert & Tuininga, Chris & Larkin, Sherry L., 2003. "Portfolio Analysis for Optimal Seafood Product Diversification and Resource Management," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Ford, Beth Pride & Musser, Wesley N., 1995. "A Comparison Of Nominal And Real Historical Risk Measures," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Paudel, K. P. & Lohr, L. & Martin, N. R., 2000. "Effect of risk perspective on fertilizer choice by sharecroppers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 115-128, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Policy; Farming System Framework; India; Case Study; static linear programming model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q11 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis; Prices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eab:develo:22925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shiro Armstrong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaberau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.