Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

• Alain Ayong Le Kama
• Katheline Schubert

There are two main approaches for defining social welfare relations for an economy with infinite horizon. The first one is to consider the set of intertemporal utility streams generated by a general set of bounded consumptions, and define a preference relation between them. This relation is ideally required to satisfy two main axioms, the Pareto axiom, which guarantees efficiency, and the Anonymity axiom, which guarantees equity. Basu and Mitra [2003] show that it is impossible to represent by a function a preference relation embodying both the efficiency and equity requirements and Basu and Mitra [2007] propose and characterize a new welfare criterion called utilitarian social welfare relation.

In the same framework, Chichilnisky [1996] proposes two axioms that capture the idea of sustainable growth: non-dictatorship of the present and non-dictatorship of the future, and exhibits a mixed criterion, adding a discounted utilitarian part (with possibly non constant discount rates), which gives a dictatorial role to the present, and a long term part, which gives a dictatorial role to the future. The drawback of Chichilnisky's approach is that it often does not allow to explicitly characterize optimal growth paths with optimal control techniques. Moreover, we observe that the optimal solution obtained with Chichilnisky's criterion, cannot in general be approximated by a sequence of optimal solutions with finite horizon.

Our aim is less general than Chichilnisky's, and Basu and Mitra's: we want to have a non-dictatorial criterion for optimal growth models. Instead of l₊^∞ as set of utilities, we just consider the set of utilities of consumptions which are generated by a specific technology. We show that the undiscounted utilitarian criterion pioneered by Ramsey [1928] is not only convenient if one wants to solve an optimal growth problem but also sustainable, efficient and equitable.

Download Info

To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

Publisher Info

Paper provided by Development and Policies Research Center (DEPOCEN), Vietnam in its series Working Papers with number 14.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: Mar 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dpc:wpaper:1408

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 8-9 2nd Floor, 216 Tran Quang Khai Street, Hanoi
Phone: 844-3935-1419
Fax: 844-3935-1418
Email:
Web page: http://www.depocenwp.org
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Doan Quang Hung).

Related research

Keywords: Anonymity; intergenerational equity; natural resources; non-dictatorship of the future; non-dictatorship of the present; optimal growth models; Pareto; social welfare function; social welfare relation; sustainability; utilitarian undiscounted criterion;

Other versions of this item:

• Paper
  • Alain Ayong Le Kama & Cuong Le Van & Katheline Schubert, 2008. "A non-dictatorial criterion for optimal growth models," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00275758_v1, HAL. [Downloadable!]
  • Alain Ayong Le Kama & Cuong Le Van & Katheline Schubert, 2008. "A non-dictatorial criterion for optimal growth models," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne v08030, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne. [Downloadable!]

Did you know? About 2700 working paper series are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-18.