Unemployment As A Social Norm: Psychological Evidence from Panel Data
AbstractThis paper uses data from the first seven waves of the British Household Panel Survey to test a key implication of a social norm of employment: that the utility of the unemployed rises with the unemployment rate of their reference group. The GHQ-12 measure of individual well-being is taken as a proxy utility measure, and the unemployment rate in the region, of the partner, and in the household are taken as measures of adherence to the employment norm. The unemployment of "relevant others" is shown often to reduce the well-being of the employed, but to be strongly positively correlated with the well-being of the unemployed. This result, far stronger for men, is robust to controls for unobserved individual heterogeneity. Last, panel data shows that those whose well-being fell the most upon entering unemployment are both somewhat more likely to search for a new job and less likely to remain unemployed. Together, these findings suggest a psychological explanation of both unemployment polarisation and labour market hysteresis, based on the utility effects of reduced adherence to the employment norm in the reference group.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure) in its series DELTA Working Papers with number 2001-17.
Date of creation: 2001
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in Journal of Labor Economics, April 2003, 21, pp. 323-351.
Other versions of this item:
- Andrew E. Clark, 2003. "Unemployment as a Social Norm: Psychological Evidence from Panel Data," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(2), pages 289-322, April.
- NEP-ALL-2003-03-19 (All new papers)
- NEP-CBE-2003-03-19 (Cognitive & Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-LAB-2003-03-19 (Labour Economics)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page. reading lists or Wikipedia pages:
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.