This paper examines how much structural change there was in the U.S. economy in the last half of the 1990s. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that there was only one major structural change, namely the huge increase in stock prices relative to earnings. All other large changes can be explained by this change. There is no obvious reason for the large increase in stock prices relative to earnings. Increased productivity growth does not appear to be an answer since the data show that there was only a modest increase in long run productivity growth in the last half of the 1990s. Also, earnings growth and the share of earnings in the economy were not unusually large.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Length: 25 pages Date of creation: Dec 2002 Date of revision:
Mar 2003 Publication status: Published in Business Economics (January 2004), 39(1): 43-53 Handle: RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:1388
Find related papers by JEL classification: E10 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - General C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation and Testing
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
D. W. K. Andrews, 2003.
"End-of-Sample Instability Tests,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 71(6), pages 1661-1694, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: