This paper proposes an empirically feasible method for correcting the path-dependence bias of chainindices of the cost of living. Chain indices are discrete approximations to Divisia indices and it is wellknown that the latter are path-dependent: the level of a Divisia index is affected not just by the levelof prices at the two endpoints but also by the path between the endpoints. It is also well-known that aDivisia index of the cost of living is path-independent if and only if all income elasticities are equal toone, a restriction that is decisively rejected by studies of consumer demand. In theory, the true cost ofliving index (or Konüs price index) could be derived by estimating the expenditure function. But thisseems impractical due to data limitations: the number of independent parameters rises roughly inproportion to the square of the number of commodities and consumer price indices contain hundredsof items. This paper shows how this problem can in fact be overcome empirically using a flexiblemodel of demand like the "Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System". The proposed method requiresdata only on prices, aggregate budget shares and aggregate expenditure. The method is applied toestimate Konüs price indices for 70 products covering nearly all the UK's Retail Prices Index over1974-2004, with each year in turn as the base. The choice of base year for utility is found to have asignificant effect on the index, even in the low inflation period since 1990.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Economic Performance, LSE in its series CEP Discussion Papers with number
dp0797.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Bernard, Andrew & Jensen, J Bradford & Redding, Stephen J & Schott, Peter, 2007.
"Firms in International Trade,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
6277, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Andrew B. Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott, 2007.
"Firms in International Trade,"
NBER Working Papers
13054, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Andrew B. Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen & Stephen Redding & Peter K. Schott, 2007.
"Firms in International Trade,"
CEP Discussion Papers
dp0795, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
[Downloadable!]
Andrew Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen & Stephen Redding & Peter Schott, 2007.
"Firms in International Trade,"
Working Papers
07-14, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
[Downloadable!]