IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt35r8k96t.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Where are Private “Smart City” Transportation Technologies Concentrated in California?

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Amy
  • Post, Alison E.
  • Ratan, Ishana
  • Hill, Mary C.
  • Zhao, Bingyu

Abstract

In recent years, “smart city” information and communication technologies have proliferated. For local government agencies, procuring and introducing these technologies offers the possibility to manage infrastructure assets more effectively, plan for preventive maintenance, and disseminate schedules and information about transit and other services. Many of these technologies are deployed by private firms in the context of local regulations and government-sponsored incentives. In the transportation sector, examples of “smart city” technology services provided by private firms include: electric vehicle (EV) chargers, micro-mobility (e.g., scooter and bike rentals), and transportation network company (TNC) services, such as Uber and Lyft. To understand variation in how private sector smart city transportation technologies are deployed across California, researchers at UC Berkeley webscraped and cross verified data on EV chargers, Uber services, and micro-mobility. EV charger data was obtained from the Department of Energy, and Uber and micromobility access data came from vendor websites.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Amy & Post, Alison E. & Ratan, Ishana & Hill, Mary C. & Zhao, Bingyu, 2022. "Where are Private “Smart City” Transportation Technologies Concentrated in California?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt35r8k96t, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt35r8k96t
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/35r8k96t.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Chan, Nelson, 2016. "Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Overcome First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8042k3d7, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu & Chua, Kelman & Yu, Honghai & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "E-scooter sharing to serve short-distance transit trips: A Singapore case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 177-196.
    2. Yu, Haitao & Peng, Zhong-Ren, 2019. "Exploring the spatial variation of ridesourcing demand and its relationship to built environment and socioeconomic factors with the geographically weighted Poisson regression," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 147-163.
    3. Alexandra König & Laura Gebhardt & Kerstin Stark & Julia Schuppan, 2022. "A Multi-Perspective Assessment of the Introduction of E-Scooter Sharing in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Virginie Boutueil & Luc Nemett & Thomas Quillerier, 2021. "Trends in Competition among Digital Platforms for Shared Mobility: Insights from a Worldwide Census and Prospects for Research," Post-Print hal-03388213, HAL.
    5. Bian, Zheyong & Liu, Xiang, 2019. "Mechanism design for first-mile ridesharing based on personalized requirements part II: Solution algorithm for large-scale problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 172-192.
    6. Elnert Coenegrachts & Joris Beckers & Thierry Vanelslander & Ann Verhetsel, 2021. "Business Model Blueprints for the Shared Mobility Hub Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Bian, Zheyong & Liu, Xiang & Bai, Yun, 2020. "Mechanism design for on-demand first-mile ridesharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 77-117.
    8. Riccardo Ceccato & Marco Diana, 2021. "Substitution and complementarity patterns between traditional transport means and car sharing: a person and trip level analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1523-1540, August.
    9. Bian, Zheyong & Liu, Xiang, 2019. "Mechanism design for first-mile ridesharing based on personalized requirements part I: Theoretical analysis in generalized scenarios," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 147-171.
    10. Jose Esteves & Daniel Alonso-Martínez & Guillermo de Haro, 2021. "Profiling Spanish Prospective Buyers of Electric Vehicles Based on Demographics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Cantelmo, Guido & Amini, Roja Ezzati & Monteiro, Mayara Moraes & Frenkel, Amnon & Lerner, Ofer & Tavory, Sharon Shoshany & Galtzur, Ayelet & Kamargianni, Maria & Shiftan, Yoram & Behrischi, Christiane, 2022. "Aligning users’ and stakeholders’ needs: How incentives can reshape the carsharing market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 306-326.
    12. Marc Kuhn & Viola Marquardt & Sarah Selinka, 2021. "“Is Sharing Really Caring?”: The Role of Environmental Concern and Trust Reflecting Usage Intention of “Station-Based” and “Free-Floating”—Carsharing Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Prateek Bansal & Akanksha Sinha & Rubal Dua & Ricardo Daziano, 2019. "Eliciting Preferences of Ridehailing Users and Drivers: Evidence from the United States," Papers 1904.06695, arXiv.org.
    14. Mingzhu Song & Kaiping Wang & Yi Zhang & Meng Li & He Qi & Yi Zhang, 2020. "Impact Evaluation of Bike-Sharing on Bicycling Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Xianlei Dong & Yongfang Cai & Jiaming Cheng & Beibei Hu & Huijun Sun, 2020. "Understanding the Competitive Advantages of Car Sharing from the Travel-Cost Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, June.
    16. Tu, Meiting & Li, Ye & Li, Wenxiang & Tu, Minchao & Orfila, Olivier & Gruyer, Dominique, 2019. "Improving ridesplitting services using optimization procedures on a shareability network: A case study of Chengdu," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Zhang, Zhenhao & Tafreshian, Amirmahdi & Masoud, Neda, 2020. "Modular transit: Using autonomy and modularity to improve performance in public transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. Rossetti, Tomás & Broaddus, Andrea & Ruhl, Melissa & Daziano, Ricardo, 2023. "Commuter preferences for a first-mile/last-mile microtransit service in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Oke, Jimi B. & Akkinepally, Arun Prakash & Chen, Siyu & Xie, Yifei & Aboutaleb, Youssef M. & Azevedo, Carlos Lima & Zegras, P. Christopher & Ferreira, Joseph & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2020. "Evaluating the systemic effects of automated mobility-on-demand services via large-scale agent-based simulation of auto-dependent prototype cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 98-126.
    20. Yuan Liang & Bingjie Yu & Xiaojian Zhang & Yi Lu & Linchuan Yang, 2022. "The Short-term Impact of Congestion Taxes on Ridesourcing Demand and Traffic Congestion: Evidence from Chicago," Papers 2207.01793, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt35r8k96t. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.