This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Efectos de la descentralización de la política de defensa de la competencia

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Juan Luis Jiménez () (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; Departamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado, Saulo Torón,4,35017, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.Tfno.:928451792; Fax: 928458183)
Javier Campos () (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; Departamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado, Saulo Torón,4,35017, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.Tfno.:928451792; Fax: 928458183)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

En los últimos años, tanto en la Unión Europea como en España, se ha procedido a descentralizar algunos aspectos relevantes de la política de defensa de la competencia. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la interacción entre información y riesgo de captura asociada a esta nueva situación, partiendo de algunos modelos clásicos de regulación. Nuestros resultados confirman que, desde el punto de vista de los precios y la eficiencia productiva, la descentralización supone una mejora al incrementar la información que posee la agencia de la competencia sobre las empresas. Sin embargo, el riesgo de captura puede ser mayor, diluyendo así esa ventaja inicial y haciendo que la descentralización, especialmente, si no va acompañada de una independencia política de la agencia, no genere resultados globales mejores que los de la centralización.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.bibliotecas.ulpgc.es/fcee/hemeroteca/documentos%20de%20trabajo/DocumentosDTrabajo/doc45/dt2004-09.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 500 Can't connect to www.bibliotecas.ulpgc.es:80 (Bad hostname 'www.bibliotecas.ulpgc.es'). If this is indeed the case, please notify (Patricia Santana)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la ULPGC in its series Documentos de trabajo conjunto ULL-ULPGC with number 2004-09.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 28
Date of creation: Sep 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:can:series:2004-09

Contact details of provider:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Patricia Santana).

Related research
Keywords: competencia descentralización captura del regulador.

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Karl Morasch, 2000. "Decentralization of Industrial Policy as Strategic Delegation," Discussion Paper Series 193, Universitaet Augsburg, Institute for Economics. [Downloadable!]
  2. Javier Campos Méndez & Juan Luis Jiménez González, 2003. "Old and new ideas in Competition Policy," Documentos de trabajo conjunto ULL-ULPGC 2003-06, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la ULPGC. [Downloadable!]
  3. Tay, Abigail & Willmann, Gerald, 2005. "Why (no) global competition policy is a tough choice," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 312-324, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Aidan Hollis & Lasheng Yuan, 2004. "Competition policy in open economies," International Economic Journal, Korean International Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 179-193, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  5. Cabral, Luis M. B., 2003. "International merger policy coordination," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 21-30, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Dag Morten Dalen & Trond Olsen, 2003. "Regulatory Competition and Multi-national Banking," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo GmbH. [Downloadable!]
  7. Boone, Jan, 2003. "Optimal Competition: A Benchmark for Competition Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 3766, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  8. Rothschild, Michael & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 1970. "Increasing risk: I. A definition," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 225-243, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Keith Head & John Ries, 1997. "International Mergers and Welfare under Decentralized Competition Policy," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 30(4), pages 1104-23, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. George J. Stigler, 1971. "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  11. Jean-Jacques Laffont & Jerome Pouyet, . "The Subsidiarity Bias in Regulation," series 0001, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche - Università di Bari. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  12. John Wilson & Eckhard Janeba, 2003. "Decentralization and International Tax Competition," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo GmbH. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can use convenient plug-ins to search directly IDEAS from your browser.

This page was last updated on 2008-9-20.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.