A monopolist can offer free samples or free returns to let consumers try his product. When the cost of offering free trials is negligible, the standard theory (Milgrom 1981, Grossman 1981) predicts unraveling: the monopolist always offers them to reveal his product’s quality. I show that when products differ in vertical quality and a horizontal attribute, unraveling may not occur. When consumers know the product’s vertical quality, the monopolist offers free trials for a central region of horizontal attributes. He is less likely to offer free trials when quality is higher. Mandating free trials may hurt expected consumer welfare. When consumers do not know the product’s vertical quality, the monopolist is more likely to offer free trials when quality is higher. Nevertheless, he may not offer free trials even when his product has the highest possible vertical quality.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ashley Seamans).
Related research
Keywords:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Simon P. Anderson & Régis Renault, 2006.
"Advertising Content,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 93-113, March.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: