IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boj/bojwps/13-e-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effects of Settlement Methods on Liquidity Needs: Empirical Study based on Funds Transfer Data

Author

Listed:
  • Saiki Tsuchiya

    (Bank of Japan)

Abstract

The level of intraday liquidity needed for settlement varies according to settlement methods. This paper is an empirical study based on funds transfer data in Japan of the effects of the shift from deferred net settlement (DNS) to real time gross settlement (RTGS) with liquidity-saving features (LSF) on the liquidity for settlements of payments among financial institutions. The study has revealed the following: (1) The extent to which liquidity financial institutions put into their accounts for settlement has increased due to the shift to RTGS; (2) the level of the liquidity which was not used for settlements; (3) the liquidity-saving effects of the LSF in an accommodative monetary environment under the zero-interest rate policy; (4) the extent to which the liquidity-saving effects have increased by the uniform application of LSF to different types of transactions; and (5) the extent to which the collateral requirements have declined as a result of the reduction in transactions settled on a DNS basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Saiki Tsuchiya, 2013. "The Effects of Settlement Methods on Liquidity Needs: Empirical Study based on Funds Transfer Data," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 13-E-2, Bank of Japan.
    • Handle: RePEc:boj:bojwps:13-e-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.boj.or.jp/en/research/wps_rev/wps_2013/data/wp13e02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marius Jurgilas & Antoine Martin, 2013. "Liquidity-saving mechanisms in collateral-based RTGS payment systems," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 29-60, February.
    2. Angelini, Paolo, 1998. "An analysis of competitive externalities in gross settlement systems," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Payment and Settlement Systems Department, 2009. "BOJ-NET Funds Transfers after the Implementation of Phase 1 of the Next-Generation RTGS Project," Bank of Japan Review Series 09-E-4, Bank of Japan.
    4. Enghin Atalay & Antoine Martin & James J. McAndrews, 2010. "Quantifying the benefits of a liquidity-saving mechanism," Staff Reports 447, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tong Mu & He Yi, 2017. "Topology of Complex Networks and Demand of Intraday Liquidity: Based on the Real-Time Gross Settlement System," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 2(49), pages 50-61, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dr. Thomas Nellen, 2015. "Collateralised liquidity, two-part tariff and settlement coordination," Working Papers 2015-13, Swiss National Bank.
    2. Shaun Byck & Ronald Heijmans, 2020. "How much liquidity would a liquidity-saving mechanism save if a liquidity-saving mechanism could save liquidity? A simulation approach for Canada's large-value payment system Shaun Byck," Working Papers 682, DNB.
    3. Nellen, Thomas, 2019. "Intraday liquidity facilities, late settlement fee and coordination," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 124-131.
    4. Christopher McMahon & Donald McGillivray & Ajit Desai & Francisco Rivadeneyra & Jean-Paul Lam & Thomas Lo & Danica Marsden & Vladimir Skavysh, 2022. "Improving the Efficiency of Payments Systems Using Quantum Computing," Staff Working Papers 22-53, Bank of Canada.
    5. Galbiati, Marco & Soramäki, Kimmo, 2011. "An agent-based model of payment systems," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 859-875, June.
    6. Marius Jurgilas & Antoine Martin, 2013. "Liquidity-saving mechanisms in collateral-based RTGS payment systems," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 29-60, February.
    7. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/4vc7skecu3q7u7s984pi2eaan is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mark J Manning & Matthew Willison, 2006. "Modelling the cross-border use of collateral in payment systems," Bank of England working papers 286, Bank of England.
    9. Mills, David Jr., 2006. "Alternative central bank credit policies for liquidity provision in a model of payments," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 1593-1611, October.
    10. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2003_023 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Antoine Martin & James J. McAndrews, 2008. "An economic analysis of liquidity-saving mechanisms," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 14(Sep), pages 25-39.
    12. Monticini, Andrea & Ravazzolo, Francesco, 2014. "Forecasting the intraday market price of money," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 304-315.
    13. Abbassi, Puriya & Fecht, Falko & Tischer, Johannes, 2015. "The intraday interest rate: What's that?," Discussion Papers 24/2015, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    14. Bhattacharya, Joydeep & Haslag, Joseph H. & Martin, Antoine, 2009. "Why does overnight liquidity cost more than intraday liquidity?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1236-1246, June.
    15. Julio J. Rotemberg, 2008. "Liquidity Needs in Economies with Interconnected Financial Obligations," NBER Working Papers 14222, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Merrouche, Ouarda & Schanz, Jochen, 2010. "Banks' intraday liquidity management during operational outages: Theory and evidence from the UK payment system," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 314-323, February.
    17. Sepahvand , Mehrdad, 2011. "Intraday Liquidity Demand of Banks in Real-Time Gross Settlement System," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 6(1), pages 151-160, October.
    18. Puriya Abbassi & Falko Fecht & Johannes Tischer, 2017. "Variations in Market Liquidity and the Intraday Interest Rate," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(4), pages 733-765, June.
    19. Tore Nilssen, 2011. "Risk externalities in a payments oligopoly," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 10(3), pages 211-234, December.
    20. Devriese, Johan & Mitchell, Janet, 2006. "Liquidity risk in securities settlement," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 1807-1834, June.
    21. Rodney J. Garratt, 2022. "An Application of Shapley Value Cost Allocation to Liquidity Savings Mechanisms," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 54(6), pages 1875-1888, September.
    22. De Caux, Robert & Brede, Markus & McGroarty, Frank, 2016. "Payment prioritisation and liquidity risk in collateralised interbank payment systems," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 139-150.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boj:bojwps:13-e-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bank of Japan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bojgvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.