The 2001 US recession: what did recession prediction models tell us?
AbstractHow predictable was the recent US recession? This paper evaluates the accuracy of several recession prediction models. In particular, traditional rule-of-thumb models using the composite index of leading indicators (CLI), Neftçi's sequential probability model, a probit model, and Stock and Watson's experimental recession indexes are compared. Despite the relatively mild depth of the recession, the models using the CLI performed particularly well. The results are robust across different types of models and with respect to the use of real-time data. The strong real-time performance stands at odds with earlier sceptical claims about the marginal usefulness of the CLI in predicting cyclical turning points, and complements the results in the earlier research of Filardo (1999). At a more conceptual level, the paper provides general support to the classical business cycle view that turning points of business cycles from expansion to recession are complex, possibly endogenous and nonlinear, phenomena. The results also suggest that the impressive insights of Geoffrey Moore into the theory and construction of the CLI will continue to shape our understanding of business cycles well into the future.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Bank for International Settlements in its series BIS Working Papers with number 148.
Length: 25 pages
Date of creation: Mar 2004
Date of revision:
US recession; recession prediction models;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Evan F. Koenig & Kenneth M. Emery, 1993.
"Why the composite index of leading indicators doesn't lead,"
9318, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
- Evan F. Koenig & Kenneth M. Emery, 1994. "Why The Composite Index Of Leading Indicators Does Not Lead," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 12(1), pages 52-66, 01.
- Robert H. McGuckin & Ataman Ozyildirim & Victor Zarnowitz, 2000.
"The Composite Index of Leading Economic Indicators: How to Make it More Timely,"
Economics Program Working Papers
00-04, The Conference Board, Economics Program.
- Robert H. McGuckin & Ataman Ozyildirim & Victor Zarnowitz, 2001. "The Composite Index of Leading Economic Indicators: How to Make It More Timely," NBER Working Papers 8430, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Andrew J. Filardo & Stephen F. Gordon, 1993.
"Business cycle durations,"
Research Working Paper
93-11, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
- Arthur F. Burns & Wesley C. Mitchell, 1946. "Measuring Business Cycles," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number burn46-1.
- Kling, John L, 1987. "Predicting the Turning Points of Business and Economic Time Series," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60(2), pages 201-38, April.
- Victor Zarnowitz, 1992. "Business Cycles: Theory, History, Indicators, and Forecasting," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number zarn92-1.
- Martin Schneider & Christian Ragacs, 2009. "Why did we fail to predict GDP during the last cycle? A breakdown of forecast errors for Austria," Working Papers 151, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Timo Laurmaa).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.