This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Land Value Tax in Jamaica: An Analysis and Options for Reform

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
David L. Sjoquist () (Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University)
Abstract

In 1957, Jamaica converted its property tax from one based on the capital value of land and all improvements, to one based on just the unimproved value of land, i.e., to a land value tax. The adoption of the unimproved value of land as the base for Jamaica’s property tax was based on the 1944 recommendation of the Commission on Inquiry, chaired by the Honorable Simon Bloomberg. The recommendation was subsequently endorsed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, but the implementation of this change was delayed because of the absence of a legal cadastre.2 The property system that existed in 1944 was a capital-based system in which both land and improvements were subject to property taxation. However, the tax relied on self-assessment by owners; each owner was required to declare the true and correct description and value of his property (Chang 1966). The Collector of Taxes could counter-assess those parcels for which he believed the owner had not provided the true and correct value. Risden (1979) reports that it was estimated that on average the assessed value was less than one-third of the fair market value of the property and that there was gross non-uniformity in the assessments. Chang (1966) reports there were two major factors associated with the introduction of the land valuation legislation. First, there was the belief that land value taxation does not tax what a person puts into land and it discourages the withholding of land from use. Second, the existing property tax system was highly unsatisfactory. In addition, according to Rosengard (1998), one of the principal objectives of this change was agrarian reform, along with a desire to shift the relative property tax burden from poor to wealthy landowners. Recently, the land value tax has become a revenue source dedicated to local governments. While collected by the national government, the revenue is returned to the parish from which the revenue was collected.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/files/ispwp0511.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University in its series International Studies Program Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU with number paper0511.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 35 pages
Date of creation: 01 Mar 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper0511

Contact details of provider:
Phone: 404-413-0235
Fax: 404-413-0244
Web page: http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/index.html
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Paul Benson).

Related research
Keywords: jamaican land value; property tax; analysis and reform;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Alm, James & McClelland, Gary H & Schulze, William D, 1999. "Changing the Social Norm of Tax Compliance by Voting," Kyklos, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 52(2), pages 141-71.
  2. Alm, James & Jackson, Betty R. & McKee, Michael, 1993. "Fiscal exchange, collective decision institutions, and tax compliance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 285-303, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by editing a NEP report.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-18.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.