In October 1998, I was one of five economists who wrote a letter to the Prime Minister, suggesting a suite of policies that could help to substantially reduce the unemployment rate to around 5 per cent. The other four were John Freebairn, Ross Garnaut, Michael Keating and Chris Richardson. This letter resulted from a period of discussion amongst the five, including at two conferences on unemployment, one hosted by the Melbourne Institute and one by the Reserve Bank and the ANU.2 Subsequent to this letter there has been much public discussion of the so called "five economists plan" and both the Federal Government and the Opposition have taken a considerable interest in the ideas put forward. Further, the Business Council of Australia endorsed the basic ideas its 'New Directions' paper on Rebuilding the Safety Net (Business Council of Australia 1999). There has also been a developing literature on the five economists plan in academia. This paper begins with a re-statement of the main features of the plan. Its main focus, however, is on the most publicised feature of the plan, a proposed wage tax trade-off, and the effect that would have on employment, unemployment and the distribution of income. Another important aim of the paper is to examine the main criticisms that the five economists have confronted. It is argued that having considered these criticisms the plan remains robust. It is conceded that there is a question-mark surrounding the political economy of the wage-tax trade-off proposal whether the institutional structures in Australia could facilitate its implementation. It is concluded that even this concern may be unfounded, but that some reform to the wage setting system may be beneficial.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number
450.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Drew Treasure).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)