IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2304.13128.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Computing Volatility Surfaces using Generative Adversarial Networks with Minimal Arbitrage Violations

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Na
  • Meixin Zhang
  • Justin Wan

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a generative adversarial network (GAN) approach for efficiently computing volatility surfaces. The idea is to make use of the special GAN neural architecture so that on one hand, we can learn volatility surfaces from training data and on the other hand, enforce no-arbitrage conditions. In particular, the generator network is assisted in training by a discriminator that evaluates whether the generated volatility matches the target distribution. Meanwhile, our framework trains the GAN network to satisfy the no-arbitrage constraints by introducing penalties as regularization terms. The proposed GAN model allows the use of shallow networks which results in much less computational costs. In our experiments, we demonstrate the performance of the proposed method by comparing with the state-of-the-art methods for computing implied and local volatility surfaces. We show that our GAN model can outperform artificial neural network (ANN) approaches in terms of accuracy and computational time.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Na & Meixin Zhang & Justin Wan, 2023. "Computing Volatility Surfaces using Generative Adversarial Networks with Minimal Arbitrage Violations," Papers 2304.13128, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2304.13128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.13128
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rama Cont & Jose da Fonseca, 2002. "Dynamics of implied volatility surfaces," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 45-60.
    2. Jim Gatheral & Antoine Jacquier, 2014. "Arbitrage-free SVI volatility surfaces," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 59-71, January.
    3. Blanka Horvath & Aitor Muguruza & Mehdi Tomas, 2021. "Deep learning volatility: a deep neural network perspective on pricing and calibration in (rough) volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 11-27, January.
    4. Ali Hirsa & Tugce Karatas & Amir Oskoui, 2019. "Supervised Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) for Pricing/Calibration of Vanilla/Exotic Options Under Various Different Processes," Papers 1902.05810, arXiv.org.
    5. Shuaiqiang Liu & Anastasia Borovykh & Lech A. Grzelak & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2019. "A neural network-based framework for financial model calibration," Papers 1904.10523, arXiv.org.
    6. Carr, Peter & Madan, Dilip B., 2005. "A note on sufficient conditions for no arbitrage," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 125-130, September.
    7. A Itkin, 2019. "Deep learning calibration of option pricing models: some pitfalls and solutions," Papers 1906.03507, arXiv.org.
    8. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    9. Jim Gatheral & Antoine Jacquier, 2011. "Convergence of Heston to SVI," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(8), pages 1129-1132.
    10. Jan De Spiegeleer & Dilip B. Madan & Sofie Reyners & Wim Schoutens, 2018. "Machine learning for quantitative finance: fast derivative pricing, hedging and fitting," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(10), pages 1635-1643, October.
    11. Phelim P. Boyle & Draviam Thangaraj, 2000. "Volatility estimation from observed option prices," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 23(1), pages 31-52.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Ruf & Weiguan Wang, 2019. "Neural networks for option pricing and hedging: a literature review," Papers 1911.05620, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    2. Samuel N. Cohen & Christoph Reisinger & Sheng Wang, 2021. "Arbitrage-free neural-SDE market models," Papers 2105.11053, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    3. Kentaro Hoshisashi & Carolyn E. Phelan & Paolo Barucca, 2023. "No-Arbitrage Deep Calibration for Volatility Smile and Skewness," Papers 2310.16703, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    4. Itkin, Andrey, 2015. "To sigmoid-based functional description of the volatility smile," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 264-291.
    5. Patrick Büchel & Michael Kratochwil & Maximilian Nagl & Daniel Rösch, 2022. "Deep calibration of financial models: turning theory into practice," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 109-136, July.
    6. Jiří Witzany & Milan Fičura, 2023. "Machine Learning Applications to Valuation of Options on Non-liquid Markets," FFA Working Papers 5.001, Prague University of Economics and Business, revised 24 Jan 2023.
    7. Martin Schweizer & Johannes Wissel, 2008. "Arbitrage-free market models for option prices: the multi-strike case," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 469-505, October.
    8. Pascal François & Rémi Galarneau‐Vincent & Geneviève Gauthier & Frédéric Godin, 2022. "Venturing into uncharted territory: An extensible implied volatility surface model," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(10), pages 1912-1940, October.
    9. Hadrien De March & Pierre Henry-Labordere, 2019. "Building arbitrage-free implied volatility: Sinkhorn's algorithm and variants," Papers 1902.04456, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    10. Christian Bayer & Blanka Horvath & Aitor Muguruza & Benjamin Stemper & Mehdi Tomas, 2019. "On deep calibration of (rough) stochastic volatility models," Papers 1908.08806, arXiv.org.
    11. Mehdi El Amrani & Antoine Jacquier & Claude Martini, 2019. "Dynamics of symmetric SSVI smiles and implied volatility bubbles," Papers 1909.10272, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    12. U Hou Lok & Yuh‐Dauh Lyuu, 2020. "Efficient trinomial trees for local‐volatility models in pricing double‐barrier options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 556-574, April.
    13. Xu, Wei & Šević, Aleksandar & Šević, Željko, 2022. "Implied volatility surface construction for commodity futures options traded in China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    14. Pierre M. Blacque-Florentin & Badr Missaoui, 2015. "Nonparametric and arbitrage-free construction of call surfaces using l1-recovery," Papers 1506.06997, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.
    15. Dilip B. Madan & Wim Schoutens, 2019. "Arbitrage Free Approximations to Candidate Volatility Surface Quotations," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Samuel N. Cohen & Christoph Reisinger & Sheng Wang, 2020. "Detecting and repairing arbitrage in traded option prices," Papers 2008.09454, arXiv.org.
    17. Hirbod Assa & Mostafa Pouralizadeh & Abdolrahim Badamchizadeh, 2019. "Sound Deposit Insurance Pricing Using a Machine Learning Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Shuaiqiang Liu & Anastasia Borovykh & Lech A. Grzelak & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2019. "A neural network-based framework for financial model calibration," Papers 1904.10523, arXiv.org.
    19. Fabio Baschetti & Giacomo Bormetti & Pietro Rossi, 2023. "Deep calibration with random grids," Papers 2306.11061, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    20. Ballotta, Laura & Rayée, Grégory, 2022. "Smiles & smirks: Volatility and leverage by jumps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 1145-1161.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2304.13128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.