IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2212.11779.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Regulation Regime Changes on ChiNext IPOs: Effects of 2013 and 2020 Reforms on Pricing and Overreaction

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Deng
  • Lunge Dai
  • Zixin Yang
  • Zhong-guo Zhou
  • Monica Hussein
  • Dingyi Chen
  • Mick Swartz

Abstract

Since its inauguration, ChiNext has gone through three time periods with two different regulation regimes and three different sets of listing day trading restrictions. This paper studies the impact of regulation regimes and listing day trading restrictions on the initial return of ChiNext IPOs. We hypothesize that the initial return of a ChiNext IPO contains the issuers intrinsic value and the investors overreaction. The intrinsic value is represented by the IPOs 21st day return (monthly return), and the difference between the monthly and initial returns (intramonth return) is a proxy of the overreaction. We find that all significant variables for all three returns in all three time periods fall into four categories: pre-listing demand, post-listing demand, market condition and pre-listing issuer value. We observe stark contrasts among variable categories for each of the returns in the three time periods, which reveals an evolution of the investors behavior with regard to the progression of regulation regimes. Based on our findings, we argue that the differences among the levels and determinants of initial return, monthly return (intrinsic value) and intramonth return (overreaction) in different time periods can be largely explained by regulation regime changes along two dimensions: 1) approval vs. registration and 2) listing day trading curbs and return limits. We find that IPO pricing is demand-driven under the approval regime, but value-driven under the registration regime. We further compare the impact of regulation regime changes on ChiNext IPO pricing practice, and propose a future research plan on ChiNext IPO pricing efficiency with policy implication.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Deng & Lunge Dai & Zixin Yang & Zhong-guo Zhou & Monica Hussein & Dingyi Chen & Mick Swartz, 2022. "The Impact of Regulation Regime Changes on ChiNext IPOs: Effects of 2013 and 2020 Reforms on Pricing and Overreaction," Papers 2212.11779, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2212.11779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.11779
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beatty, Randolph P. & Ritter, Jay R., 1986. "Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 213-232.
    2. Alexander Ljungqvist & Vikram Nanda & Rajdeep Singh, 2006. "Hot Markets, Investor Sentiment, and IPO Pricing," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(4), pages 1667-1702, July.
    3. Qi Deng & Zhong-guo Zhou, 2017. "IPO Pricing Efficiency in China: A ChiNext Board Focus," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 12(2), pages 280-308, June.
    4. Deng, Qi & Zhou, Zhong-guo, 2016. "Overreaction in ChiNext IPOs' initial returns: How much and what caused it?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 82-103.
    5. Baron, David P & Holmstrom, Bengt, 1980. "The Investment Banking Contract for New Issues under Asymmetric Information: Delegation and the Incentive Problem," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 35(5), pages 1115-1138, December.
    6. Hu, Yi & Dai, Tiantian & Li, Yong & Mallick, Sushanta & Ning, Lutao & Zhu, Baohua, 2021. "Underwriter reputation and IPO underpricing: The role of institutional investors in the Chinese growth enterprise market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Michaely, Roni & Shaw, Wayne H, 1994. "The Pricing of Initial Public Offerings: Tests of Adverse-Selection and Signaling Theories," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 7(2), pages 279-319.
    8. Zhou, Zhong-guo & Hussein, Monica & Deng, Qi, 2021. "ChiNext IPOs' initial returns before and after the 2013 stock market reform: What can we learn?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    9. Baron, D. P. & Holmström, B. R., 1980. "Abstract: The Investment Banking Contract for New Issues Under Asymmetric Information: Delegation and the Incentive Problem," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 851-851, November.
    10. Demers, Elizabeth & Lewellen, Katharina, 2003. "The marketing role of IPOs: evidence from internet stocks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 413-437, June.
    11. Ibbotson, Roger G., 1975. "Price performance of common stock new issues," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 235-272, September.
    12. Welch, Ivo, 1992. "Sequential Sales, Learning, and Cascades," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 695-732, June.
    13. Rock, Kevin, 1986. "Why new issues are underpriced," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 187-212.
    14. Sudipto Bhattacharya, 1979. "Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and "The Bird in the Hand" Fallacy," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 259-270, Spring.
    15. Qi Deng & Zhong-guo Zhou, 2015. "Offline Oversubscription, Issue Size, and Market Momentum: The Driving Forces for ChiNext IPOs’ Initial Underpricing," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 114-129, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deng, Qi & Dai, Lunge & Yang, Zixin & Zhou, Zhong-Guo & Hussein, Monica & Chen, Dingyi & Swartz, Mick, 2023. "The impacts of regulation regime changes on ChiNext IPOs: Effects of 2013 and 2020 reforms on initial return, fair value and overreaction," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Qi Deng & Linhong Zheng & Jiaqi Peng & Xu Li & Zhong-guo Zhou & Monica Hussein & Dingyi Chen & Mick Swartz, 2023. "The Impacts of Registration Regime Implementation on IPO Pricing Efficiency," Papers 2307.09669, arXiv.org.
    3. Fouad Jamaani & Manal Alidarous, 2019. "Review of Theoretical Explanations of IPO Underpricing," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18.
    4. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K. & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Kouretas, Georgios P., 2022. "U.S. banks’ IPOs and political money contributions," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Kouretas, Georgios P., 2021. "Market expectations and the impact of credit rating on the IPOs of U.S. banks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 587-610.
    6. Jay R. Ritter & Ivo Welch, 2002. "A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(4), pages 1795-1828, August.
    7. Sascha Füllbrunn & Tibor Neugebauer & Andreas Nicklisch, 2020. "Underpricing of initial public offerings in experimental asset markets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(4), pages 1002-1029, December.
    8. Riccardo Ferretti & Antonio Meles, 2010. "Underpricing, wealth loss for pre-existing shareholders and the cost of going public: the role of private equity backing in Italian IPOs," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 23-47, September.
    9. Chang, Eddy & Chen, Chao & Chi, Jing & Young, Martin, 2008. "IPO underpricing in China: New evidence from the primary and secondary markets," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Rohit Bansal & Ashu Khanna, 2013. "Vector Auto-regressive Analysis of Determinants of IPO Underpricing: Empirical Evidence from Bombay Stock Exchange," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(4), pages 651-689, December.
    11. Patrick Sentis, 2009. "Merging Activity as a Rational Explanation for the Long-Run Underperformance of IPO," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 13(1-2), pages 75-102, March-Jun.
    12. Klova, Valeriia, 2017. "IPO underpricing: What about the shipping sector?," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 42, pages 95-115.
    13. Kazunori Miwa & Satoshi Taguchi & Tatsushi Yamamoto, 2017. "Are IPOs “Overpriced?” Strategic Interactions between the Entrepreneur and the Underwriter," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-07, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    14. Takahiro Endo & Nidhi Srinivas & Yuki Tsuboyama, 2017. "The Role of Meta-organising in Legitimacy Recovery: The Case of Frozen Food Category in Japan," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-10, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    15. Riccardo Ferretti & Antonio Meles, 2010. "Underpricing, wealth loss for pre-existing shareholders and the cost of going public: the role of private equity backing in Italian IPOs," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 23-47, September.
    16. Dev Prasad & George S. Vozikis & Garry D. Bruton & Andreas Merikas, 1996. "“Harvesting†through Initial Public Offerings (IPOs): The Implications of Underpricing for the Small Firm," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 20(2), pages 31-41, January.
    17. Oehler, Andreas & Rummer, Marco & Smith, Peter N., 2004. "IPO Pricing and the Relative Importance of Investor Sentiment: Evidence from Germany," Discussion Papers 26, University of Bamberg, Chair of Finance.
    18. Dorsman, André & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios, 2013. "European Sovereign Debt Crisis and the performance of Dutch IPOs," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 308-319.
    19. Pons-Sanz, Vicente, 2005. "Who benefits from IPO underpricing? Evidence form hybrid bookbuilding offerings," Working Paper Series 428, European Central Bank.
    20. Hahl, Teemu & Vähämaa, Sami & Äijö, Janne, 2014. "Value versus growth in IPOs: New evidence from Finland," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-31.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2212.11779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.