IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1610.03718.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fast, Accurate, Straightforward Extreme Quantiles of Compound Loss Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • J. D. Opdyke

Abstract

We present an easily implemented, fast, and accurate method for approximating extreme quantiles of compound loss distributions (frequency+severity) as are commonly used in insurance and operational risk capital models. The Interpolated Single Loss Approximation (ISLA) of Opdyke (2014) is based on the widely used Single Loss Approximation (SLA) of Degen (2010) and maintains two important advantages over its competitors: first, ISLA correctly accounts for a discontinuity in SLA that otherwise can systematically and notably bias the quantile (capital) approximation under conditions of both finite and infinite mean. Secondly, because it is based on a closed-form approximation, ISLA maintains the notable speed advantages of SLA over other methods requiring algorithmic looping (e.g. fast Fourier transform or Panjer recursion). Speed is important when simulating many quantile (capital) estimates, as is so often required in practice, and essential when simulations of simulations are needed (e.g. some power studies). The modified ISLA (MISLA) presented herein increases the range of application across the severity distributions most commonly used in these settings, and it is tested against extensive Monte Carlo simulation (one billion years' worth of losses) and the best competing method (the perturbative expansion (PE2) of Hernandez et al., 2014) using twelve heavy-tailed severity distributions, some of which are truncated. MISLA is shown to be comparable to PE2 in terms of both speed and accuracy, and it is arguably more straightforward to implement for the majority of Advanced Measurement Approaches (AMA) banks that are already using SLA (and failing to take into account its biasing discontinuity).

Suggested Citation

  • J. D. Opdyke, 2016. "Fast, Accurate, Straightforward Extreme Quantiles of Compound Loss Distributions," Papers 1610.03718, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2017.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1610.03718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.03718
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kensuke Ishitani & Kenichi Sato, 2013. "An Analytical Evaluation Method of the Operational Risk Using Fast Wavelet Expansion Techniques," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 20(3), pages 283-309, September.
    2. Gareth W. Peters & Rodrigo S. Targino & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2013. "Understanding Operational Risk Capital Approximations: First and Second Orders," Papers 1303.2910, arXiv.org.
    3. Bakhodir Ergashev & Konstantin Pavlikov & Stan Uryasev & Evangelos Sekeris, 2016. "Estimation of Truncated Data Samples in Operational Risk Modeling," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 83(3), pages 613-640, September.
    4. J. D. Opdyke, 2014. "Estimating Operational Risk Capital with Greater Accuracy, Precision, and Robustness," Papers 1406.0389, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2014.
    5. Paul Embrechts & Marco Frei, 2009. "Panjer recursion versus FFT for compound distributions," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(3), pages 497-508, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. D. Opdyke, 2014. "Estimating Operational Risk Capital with Greater Accuracy, Precision, and Robustness," Papers 1406.0389, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2014.
    2. Zhou, Xiaoping & Durfee, Antonina V. & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2016. "On stability of operational risk estimates by LDA: From causes to approaches," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 266-278.
    3. Daoping Yu & Vytaras Brazauskas, 2017. "Model Uncertainty in Operational Risk Modeling Due to Data Truncation: A Single Risk Case," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Matteo Malavasi & Gareth W. Peters & Pavel V. Shevchenko & Stefan Truck & Jiwook Jang & Georgy Sofronov, 2021. "Cyber Risk Frequency, Severity and Insurance Viability," Papers 2111.03366, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    5. Blier-Wong, Christopher & Cossette, Hélène & Marceau, Etienne, 2023. "Risk aggregation with FGM copulas," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 102-120.
    6. Vernic, Raluca, 2018. "On the evaluation of some multivariate compound distributions with Sarmanov’s counting distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 184-193.
    7. Fallou Niakh, 2023. "A fixed point approach for computing actuarially fair Pareto optimal risk-sharing rules," Papers 2303.05421, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    8. Feria-Domínguez, José Manuel & Jiménez-Rodríguez, Enrique & Sholarin, Ola, 2015. "Tackling the over-dispersion of operational risk: Implications on capital adequacy requirements," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 206-221.
    9. Rodrigo S. Targino & Gareth W. Peters & Georgy Sofronov & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2017. "Optimal Exercise Strategies for Operational Risk Insurance via Multiple Stopping Times," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 487-518, June.
    10. Maria-Teresa Bosch-Badia & Joan Montllor-Serrats & Maria-Antonia Tarrazon-Rodon, 2020. "Risk Analysis through the Half-Normal Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, November.
    11. Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2009. "Implementing Loss Distribution Approach for Operational Risk," Papers 0904.1805, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2009.
    12. Francesca Greselin & Fabio Piacenza & Ričardas Zitikis, 2019. "Practice Oriented and Monte Carlo Based Estimation of the Value-at-Risk for Operational Risk Measurement," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Paul Larsen, 2015. "Asyptotic Normality for Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Operational Risk," Papers 1508.02824, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.
    14. Marios N. Kyriacou, 2015. "Credit Risk Measurement in Financial Institutions: Going Beyond Regulatory Compliance," Cyprus Economic Policy Review, University of Cyprus, Economics Research Centre, vol. 9(1), pages 31-72, June.
    15. Fomichov, Vladimir & González Cázares, Jorge & Ivanovs, Jevgenijs, 2021. "Implementable coupling of Lévy process and Brownian motion," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 407-431.
    16. Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2010. "Implementing loss distribution approach for operational risk," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 277-307, May.
    17. Malavasi, Matteo & Peters, Gareth W. & Shevchenko, Pavel V. & Trück, Stefan & Jang, Jiwook & Sofronov, Georgy, 2022. "Cyber risk frequency, severity and insurance viability," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 90-114.
    18. Giuricich, Mario Nicoló & Burnecki, Krzysztof, 2019. "Modelling of left-truncated heavy-tailed data with application to catastrophe bond pricing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 498-513.
    19. Gareth W. Peters & Pavel V. Shevchenko & Bertrand K. Hassani & Ariane Chapelle, 2016. "Should the advanced measurement approach be replaced with the standardized measurement approach for operational risk?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01391091, HAL.
    20. Dirk Tasche, 2015. "The Two Defaults Scenario for Stressing Credit Portfolio Loss Distributions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1610.03718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.