IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/0706.0478.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal Investment with an Unbounded Random Endowment and Utility-Based Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Owen
  • Gordan Zitkovic

Abstract

This paper studies the problem of maximizing the expected utility of terminal wealth for a financial agent with an unbounded random endowment, and with a utility function which supports both positive and negative wealth. We prove the existence of an optimal trading strategy within a class of permissible strategies -- those strategies whose wealth process is a supermartingale under all pricing measures with finite relative entropy. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the absence of utility-based arbitrage, and for the existence of a solution to the primal problem. We consider two utility-based methods which can be used to price contingent claims. Firstly we investigate marginal utility-based price processes (MUBPP's). We show that such processes can be characterized as local martingales under the normalized optimal dual measure for the utility maximizing investor. Finally, we present some new results on utility indifference prices, including continuity properties and volume asymptotics for the case of a general utility function, unbounded endowment and unbounded contingent claims.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Owen & Gordan Zitkovic, 2007. "Optimal Investment with an Unbounded Random Endowment and Utility-Based Pricing," Papers 0706.0478, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2007.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:0706.0478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0706.0478
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordan Zitkovic, 2005. "Utility Maximization with a Stochastic Clock and an Unbounded Random Endowment," Papers math/0503516, arXiv.org.
    2. Becherer, Dirk, 2003. "Rational hedging and valuation of integrated risks under constant absolute risk aversion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Sara Biagini & Marco Frittelli, 2005. "Utility maximization in incomplete markets for unbounded processes," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 493-517, October.
    4. Julien Hugonnier & Dmitry Kramkov, 2004. "Optimal investment with random endowments in incomplete markets," Papers math/0405293, arXiv.org.
    5. Elyès Jouini & Walter Schachermayer & Nizar Touzi, 2006. "Law Invariant Risk Measures Have the Fatou Property," Post-Print halshs-00176522, HAL.
    6. Sara Biagini & Marco Frittelli, 2007. "The supermartingale property of the optimal wealth process for general semimartingales," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 253-266, April.
    7. Marco Frittelli, 2000. "Introduction to a theory of value coherent with the no-arbitrage principle," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 275-297.
    8. Jan Kallsen, 2002. "Derivative pricing based on local utility maximization," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 115-140.
    9. Foldes, Lucien, 2000. "Valuation and martingale properties of shadow prices: An exposition," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1641-1701, October.
    10. Freddy Delbaen & Peter Grandits & Thorsten Rheinländer & Dominick Samperi & Martin Schweizer & Christophe Stricker, 2002. "Exponential Hedging and Entropic Penalties," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 99-123, April.
    11. Julien Hugonnier & Dmitry Kramkov & Walter Schachermayer, 2005. "On Utility‐Based Pricing Of Contingent Claims In Incomplete Markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 203-212, April.
    12. Jan Kallsen & Christoph Kühn, 2004. "Pricing derivatives of American and game type in incomplete markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 261-284, May.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/342 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Michael Mania & Martin Schweizer, 2005. "Dynamic exponential utility indifference valuation," Papers math/0508489, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark P. Owen & Gordan Žitković, 2009. "Optimal Investment With An Unbounded Random Endowment And Utility‐Based Pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 129-159, January.
    2. Johannes Gerer & Gregor Dorfleitner, 2016. "A Note On Utility Indifference Pricing," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Kallsen Jan & Rheinländer Thorsten, 2011. "Asymptotic utility-based pricing and hedging for exponential utility," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 28(1), pages 17-36, March.
    4. Michail Anthropelos & Gordan Žitković, 2010. "Partial equilibria with convex capital requirements: existence, uniqueness and stability," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 107-135, January.
    5. Keita Owari, 2011. "A Note on Utility Maximization with Unbounded Random Endowment," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 18(1), pages 89-103, March.
    6. Kallsen Jan & Kühn Christoph, 2006. "On utility-based derivative pricing with and without intermediate trades," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 24(4/2006), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Weidong Tian & Daisuke Yoshikawa, 2017. "Analyzing Equilibrium in Incomplete Markets with Model Uncertainty," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 17(2), pages 235-262, June.
    8. Mingxin Xu, 2006. "Risk measure pricing and hedging in incomplete markets," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 51-71, January.
    9. Lixin Wu & Min Dai, 2009. "Pricing jump risk with utility indifference," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 177-186.
    10. Michail Anthropelos & Gordan Zitkovic, 2009. "Partial Equilibria with Convex Capital Requirements: Existence, Uniqueness and Stability," Papers 0901.3318, arXiv.org.
    11. Shuoqing Deng & Xiaolu Tan & Xiang Yu, 2018. "Utility maximization with proportional transaction costs under model uncertainty," Papers 1805.06498, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2019.
    12. Michail Anthropelos & Nikolaos E. Frangos & Stylianos Z. Xanthopoulos & Athanasios N. Yannacopoulos, 2008. "On contingent claims pricing in incomplete markets: A risk sharing approach," Papers 0809.4781, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2012.
    13. Shuoqing Deng & Xiaolu Tan & Xiang Yu, 2020. "Utility Maximization with Proportional Transaction Costs Under Model Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 1210-1236, November.
    14. Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Stability of Radner equilibria with respect to small frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 443-502, April.
    15. Scott Robertson & Konstantinos Spiliopoulos, 2014. "Indifference pricing for Contingent Claims: Large Deviations Effects," Papers 1410.0384, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2016.
    16. Owari, Keita & 尾張, 圭太, 2008. "Robust Exponential Hedging and Indifference Valuation," Discussion Papers 2008-09, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    17. Klebert Kentia & Christoph Kuhn, 2017. "Nash equilibria for game contingent claims with utility-based hedging," Papers 1707.09351, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    18. Dejian Tian, 2022. "Pricing principle via Tsallis relative entropy in incomplete market," Papers 2201.05316, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    19. Michael Monoyios, 2012. "Malliavin calculus method for asymptotic expansion of dual control problems," Papers 1209.6497, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2013.
    20. Alet Roux & Zhikang Xu, 2019. "Optimal investment and contingent claim valuation with exponential disutility under proportional transaction costs," Papers 1909.06260, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:0706.0478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.