This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Partial Equilibria with Convex Capital Requirements: Existence, Uniqueness and Stability

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Michail Anthropelos
Gordan Zitkovic
Abstract

In an incomplete semimartingale model of a financial market, we consider several risk-averse financial agents who negotiate the price of a bundle of contingent claims. Assuming that the agents' risk preferences are modelled by convex capital requirements, we define and analyze their demand functions and propose a notion of a partial equilibrium price. In addition to sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness, we also show that the equilibrium prices are stable with respect to misspecifications of agents' risk preferences.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.3318
File Format: text/html
File Function: Abstract
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0901.3318
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Latest version
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by arXiv.org in its series Quantitative Finance Papers with number 0901.3318.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Jan 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:0901.3318

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://arxiv.org/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (arXiv administrators).

Related research
Keywords:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Julien Hugonnier & Dmitry Kramkov, 2004. "Optimal investment with random endowments in incomplete markets," Quantitative Finance Papers math/0405293, arXiv.org. [Downloadable!]
  2. Mingxin Xu, 2006. "Risk measure pricing and hedging in incomplete markets," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 51-71, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  3. Elyès Jouini & Clotilde Napp, 2004. "Convergence of utility functions and convergence of optimal strategies," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 133-144, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. (**), Hui Wang & Jaksa Cvitanic & (*), Walter Schachermayer, 2001. "Utility maximization in incomplete markets with random endowment," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 259-272. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Kasper Larsen & Gordan Zitkovic, 2007. "Stability of utility-maximization in incomplete markets," Quantitative Finance Papers 0706.0474, arXiv.org. [Downloadable!]
  6. Burgert, Christian & Rüschendorf, Ludger, 2008. "Allocation of risks and equilibrium in markets with finitely many traders," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 177-188, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Damir Filipović & Michael Kupper, 2008. "Optimal Capital And Risk Transfers For Group Diversification," Mathematical Finance, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 18(1), pages 55-76. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? LogEc provides statistical analysis about downloads from this service (and others).

This page was last updated on 2009-12-22.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.