This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The effect of institutional setting on attributional content in management commentary reports

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Aerts W.
Tarca A.
Abstract

We study the effect of expected regulatory and litigation costs embedded in a country’s institutional environment on the explanatory content of management commentary reports. Using a behavioural accountability lens, we argue that regulatory control and expected litigation risk affect the attributional framing of financial performance. We also investigate whether differential attributional properties have economic relevance by considering the relationship between content profiles and analyst forecast dispersion. We include 173 listed firms from four countries (USA, Canada, United Kingdom and Australia). Consistent with behavioural accountability theory, we find significant country differences in dominant attributional profiles. Compared to their counterparts in the UK and Australia, firms from the USA and Canada are generally less assertive and less defensive in explicit causal framing. They are also more extensive and formal in their explanations, relying more heavily on accounting-technical language. These tendencies are more pronounced in the USA, where the aggregate of private and public enforcement is greatest. Moreover, we establish that causal defensiveness and attributional extensiveness are negatively associated with analyst forecast dispersion, while level of causal assertiveness and formality are not.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ua.ac.be/download.aspx?c=*TEWHI&n=60625&ct=59067&e=171601
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics in its series Working Papers with number 2008010.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 41 pages
Date of creation: Jun 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2008010

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Prinsstraat 13, B-2000 Antwerpen
Web page: http://www.ua.ac.be/tew
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Joeri Nys).

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Rafael LaPorta & Florencio Lopez de-Silanes & Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 1997. "Legal Determinants of External Finance," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 1788, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
    Other versions:
  2. Bhushan, Ravi, 1989. "Firm characteristics and analyst following," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2-3), pages 255-274, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Barton, Jan & Mercer, Molly, 2005. "To blame or not to blame: Analysts' reactions to external explanations for poor financial performance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 509-533, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Wendy Beekes & Philip Brown, 2006. "Do Better-Governed Australian Firms Make More Informative Disclosures?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(3-4), pages 422-450. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Aerts, Walter, 2005. "Picking up the pieces: impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 493-517, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Rafael Porta & Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 2006. "What Works in Securities Laws?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(1), pages 1-32, 02. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  7. Gary K Meek & Clare B Roberts & Sidney J Gray, 1995. "Factors Influencing Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures By U.S., U.K. and Continental European Multinational Corporations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 555-572, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Cheng, Eugene C.M. & Courtenay, Stephen M., 2006. "Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 262-289. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Skinner, Douglas J., 1997. "Earnings disclosures and stockholder lawsuits," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 249-282, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Chen, Kevin C.W., 2006. "Board composition, regulatory regime, and voluntary disclosure," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 290-292. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  11. Archambault, Jeffrey J. & Archambault, Marie E., 2003. "A multinational test of determinants of corporate disclosure," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 173-194. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Christian Leuz, 2003. "IAS Versus U.S. GAAP: Information Asymmetry-Based Evidence from Germany's New Market," Journal of Accounting Research, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(3), pages 445-472, 06. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Eng, L. L. & Mak, Y. T., 2003. "Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 325-345. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  14. Mark H. Lang & Karl V. Lins & Darius P. Miller, 2003. "ADRs, Analysts, and Accuracy: Does Cross Listing in the United States Improve a Firm's Information Environment and Increase Market Value?," Journal of Accounting Research, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 317-345, 05. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  15. Healy, Paul M. & Palepu, Krishna G., 2001. "Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 405-440, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  16. Darren T. Roulstone, 2003. "The Relation Between Insider-Trading Restrictions and Executive Compensation," Journal of Accounting Research, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(3), pages 525-551, 06. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  17. Seetharaman, Ananth & Gul, Ferdinand A. & Lynn, Stephen G., 2002. "Litigation risk and audit fees: evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 91-115, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All top Economics journals are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-28.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.