Dynamic programming models with continuous state and control variables are solved approximately using numerical methods in most applications. We develop a method for measuring the accuracy of numerical solution of stochastic dynamic programming models. Using this method, we compare the accuracy of various interpolation schemes. As expected, the results show that the accuracy improves as number of nodes is increased. Comparison of Chebyshev and linear spline indicates that the linear spline may give higher maximum absolute error than Chebyshev, however, the overall performance of spline interpolation is better than Chebyshev interpolation for non-smooth functions. Two-stage grid search method of optimization is developed and examined with accuracy analysis. The results show that this method is more efficient and accurate. Accuracy is also examined by allocating a different number of nodes for each dimension. The results show that a change in node configuration may yield a more efficient and accurate solution.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics in its series Staff Papers with number
14230.
Length: Date of creation: 2006 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:14230
Contact details of provider: Postal: 231ClaOff Building, 1994 Buford Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108-6040 Phone: (612) 625-1222 Fax: (612) 625-6245 Email: Web page: http://www.apec.umn.edu More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (AgEcon Search).
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: