IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea17/252525.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost of Procuring Invasive Eastern Red Cedar Biomass for use as a Biobased Product Feedstock

Author

Listed:
  • Ramli, Nurul Nadia
  • Epplin, Francis

Abstract

Suppression of prairie fires enabled Eastern Red Cedar (ERC) to invade and thrive on more than 12 million infested acres previously dominated by native grasses. Feedstock procurement for a biorefinery designed to use ERC biomass, would be unique relative to energy crop production systems such as switchgrass that can be expected to harvest feedstock produced on the same unit of land each year. Density of ERC is heterogeneous. After cutting, ERC does not regrow and after ERC is removed landowners could be expected to take measures such as prescribed fire to control it. A mixed integer mathematical programming model is constructed to determine the cost to obtain the rights to harvest, harvest, and deliver a specified quantity of ERC biomass each year, for a period of 20 years, to a biorefinery location. The optimal strategy depends critically on several assumptions including the proportion of ERC biomass under contract enabling ERC harvest once during the 20 years; ERC growth rate; ERC density; discount rate; harvest and transportation cost; and quantity of biomass required per day. Optimal harvest strategy, optimal biorefinery location, and maximum daily biorefinery capacity, are sensitive to tree density and the proportion of ERC biomass in the region from which ERC can be removed. The expected cost of delivered biomass ranges from $41 to $92 per ton depending on the assumption of proportion of ERC biomass under contract, quantity of biomass required at the biorefinery, harvest cost, growth rate of unharvested trees under contract, and discount rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramli, Nurul Nadia & Epplin, Francis, 2017. "Cost of Procuring Invasive Eastern Red Cedar Biomass for use as a Biobased Product Feedstock," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252525, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea17:252525
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.252525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/252525/files/P-NR_SAEA_2017%20Size%20Reduced.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.252525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Griffith, Andrew P. & Haque, Mohua & Epplin, Francis M., 2014. "Cost to produce and deliver cellulosic feedstock to a biorefinery: Switchgrass and forage sorghum," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 44-54.
    2. Boyer, Tracy & Ramli, Nurul Nadia, "undated". "Pest or Product? Willingness to Pay for Eastern Redcedar Removal in Oklahoma," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 230076, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Wu, Jinzhuo & Sperow, Mark & Wang, Jingxin, 2010. "Economic Feasibility of a Woody Biomass- Based Ethanol Plant in Central Appalachia," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(3), pages 1-23, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haque, Mohua & Biermacher, Jon T. & Guretzky, John A. & Kering, Maru K., 2012. "Does Soil Nutrient and Remobilization Affect Harvest Strategy and Nutrient Management Decisions for Switchgrass Feedstock?," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124985, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Tubetov, Dulat & Maart, Syster Christin & Musshoff, Oliver, 2012. "Comparison of the investment behavior of Kazakhstani and German farmers: An experimental approach," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124650, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Gouzaye, Amadou & Epplin, Francis, 2016. "Restricting Switchgrass Biomass Feedstock Production to Marginal Land to Limit Competition with Food Production," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 229200, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Tubetov, Dulat & Maart, Syster Christin & Musshoff, Oliver, 2012. "Comparison of the Investment Behavior of German and Kazakhstani Farmers: an Experimental Approach," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 122422, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    5. Bedoić, Robert & Jurić, Filip & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Čuček, Lidija & Duić, Neven, 2020. "Beyond energy crops and subsidised electricity – A study on sustainable biogas production and utilisation in advanced energy markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Osmani, Atif & Zhang, Jun, 2014. "Economic and environmental optimization of a large scale sustainable dual feedstock lignocellulosic-based bioethanol supply chain in a stochastic environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 572-587.
    7. Gouzaye, Amadou & Epplin, Francis M., 2016. "Land requirements, feedstock haul distance, and expected profit response to land use restrictions for switchgrass production," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 59-66.
    8. Tubetov, Dulat & Maart, Syster Christin & Musshoff, Oliver, 2012. "Experimental examination of land investment decisions with volatile returns A comparison between Kazakhstani and German farmers," 123rd Seminar, February 23-24, 2012, Dublin, Ireland 122454, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Fasahati, Peyman & Liu, J. Jay & Ohlrogge, John B. & Saffron, Christopher M., 2019. "Process design and economics for production of advanced biofuels from genetically modified lipid-producing sorghum," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1459-1470.
    10. Williams, Jeffery & Brammer, Jon & Llewelyn, Richard & Bergtold, Jason, 2015. "Producing and Harvesting Perennial Grasses for Cellulosic Biomass versus Alfalfa in Northeast Kansas," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10.
    11. Wang, Yuxi & Wang, Jingxin & Schuler, Jamie & Hartley, Damon & Volk, Timothy & Eisenbies, Mark, 2020. "Optimization of harvest and logistics for multiple lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks in the northeastern United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea17:252525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.