IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea16/230016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Genetically Engineered Edamame

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfe, Elijah
  • Popp, Michael
  • Bazzani, Claudia
  • Nayga Jr, Rudolfo
  • Danforth, Diana
  • Popp, Jennie
  • Chen, Pengyin
  • Seo, Han-Seok

Abstract

Soybeans have been a principal commodity crop in Arkansas for decades with approximately 3.2 million acres devoted to its’ production. Soybeans grown in Arkansas and the U.S. are predominantly genetically engineered (GE) as weed control is easier and more economical using this practice. Edamame, green immature soybean harvested near the end of the pod filling stage, has experienced strong sales growth in the U.S. in recent years and Mulberry, Arkansas, is the headquarters of an edamame processing facility. Created in 2012, it is the first at the commercial scale and largest in the US. The technology is available to grow GE edamame, but anticipated consumer resistance to GE edamame has stopped the industry to date to plant and sell GE edamame. With recent discussion about food labeling legislation, requiring foods to display whether a product is GE, the potential opportunity exists to market GE edamame. This study assesses the consumers’ maximum willingness to pay for GE edamame and explores product labeling effects on edamame using a non-hypothetical experimental auction as well as a sensory test to compare GE to conventional edamame using soybeans grown at the University of Arkansas’s Fayetteville Agricultural Experiment Station.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfe, Elijah & Popp, Michael & Bazzani, Claudia & Nayga Jr, Rudolfo & Danforth, Diana & Popp, Jennie & Chen, Pengyin & Seo, Han-Seok, 2016. "Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Genetically Engineered Edamame," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 230016, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea16:230016
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.230016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230016/files/SAEA%20Edamame%20Wolfe.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.230016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Merritt, Meagan G. & Delong, Karen Lewis & Griffith, Andrew P. & Jensen, Kimberly L., 2018. "Consumer Willingness To Pay For Tennessee Certified Beef," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 233-254, May.
    2. Yanghao Wang & Metin Çakır, 2020. "Welfare impacts of new demand‐enhancing agricultural products: The case of Honeycrisp apples," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(3), pages 445-457, May.
    3. Vroegindewey, Ryan & Richardson, Robert B. & Ortega, David L. & Theriault, Veronique, 2021. "Consumer and retailer preferences for local ingredients in processed foods: Evidence from a stacked choice experiment in an African urban dairy market," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Paola A Hernández & Francesca Galli & Paolo Prosperi & Šūmane Sandra & Dominic Duckett & Henrik Eli Almaas, 2021. "Do small food businesses enable small farms to connect to regional food systems? Evidence from 9 European regions," Post-Print hal-03463710, HAL.
    5. Qianfeng Luo & Pengfei Liu & Zhi Li, 2023. "The influence of African swine fever information on consumers’ preference of pork attributes and pork purchase," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 71(1), pages 49-68, March.
    6. Sauthoff, Saramena & Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2017. "To switch or not to switch? – Understanding German consumers’ willingness to pay for green electricity tariff attributes," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260771, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    7. De Salvo, Maria & Scarpa, Riccardo & Capitello, Roberta & Begalli, Diego, 2020. "Multi-country stated preferences choice analysis for fresh tomatoes," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(3), December.
    8. Peter Slade & Jeffrey D Michler & Anna Josephson, 2019. "Foreign Geographical Indications, Consumer Preferences, and the Domestic Market for Cheese," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 370-390.
    9. Camillus Abawiera Wongnaa & Faizal Adams & Richard Kwasi Bannor & Dadson Awunyo-Vitor & Isaac Mahama & Bismark Afoakwa Osei & Yaw Owusu-Ansah & Angelina Ackon, 2019. "Job creation and improved consumer health through commercialisation of tiger nut yoghurt: a willingness to pay analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Caputo, Vincenzina & Scarpa, Riccardo & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Ortega, David L., 2018. "Are preferences for food quality attributes really normally distributed? An analysis using flexible mixing distributions," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 10-27.
    11. Dominika Jakubowska & Tomasz Wierzejski & Wojciech Lewicki, 2021. "Perception of Food Quality Labels: An Empirical Analysis Among Traditional Food Producers in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 243-259.
    12. Nicholas Tyack & Milan Ščasný, 2018. "Social Valuation of Genebank Activities: Assessing Public Demand for Genetic Resource Conservation in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Varela, Elsa & Kallas, Zein, 2022. "Extensive Mediterranean agroecosystems and their linked traditional breeds: Societal demand for the conservation of the Majorcan black pig," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    14. Ding, Ye & Nayga Jr, Rodolfo M. & Zeng, Yinchu & Yang, Wei & Arielle Snell, Heather, 2022. "Consumers’ valuation of a live video feed in restaurant kitchens for online food delivery service," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Fecke, Wilm & Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2018. "Online-Einkauf von Pflanzenschutzmitteln: Ein Discrete Choice Experiment mit landwirtschaftlichen Unternehmern in Deutschland," DARE Discussion Papers 1811, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Consumer/Household Economics; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; Marketing;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea16:230016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.