IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae91/183365.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Management of Fisheries as a Common Property Resource

Author

Listed:
  • Bjorndal, Trond

Abstract

Man has always looked to the ocean as an important food source, and expectations as to what resources the oceans can bring have often been high: 'It is said that the last frontier of inner space lies in the oceans of the world, and that man, by thrusting back this frontier, may gain almost limitless resources to feed future generations' (Christy and Scott, 1965). However, as with any other resource, the ability to obtain maximum benefits from its exploitation rests on the ability to utilize it efficiently. Traditionally most fisheries were common property resources characterized by free entry or open access. This meant that the resource was open to anybody, and no one had the right to preclude others from fishing. However, free access to any scarce resource inevitably leads to inefficient exploitation. For fisheries, this involves over-exploitation of the resource and the application of excessive amounts of productive resources such as capital and labour to the production process.

Suggested Citation

  • Bjorndal, Trond, 1992. "Management of Fisheries as a Common Property Resource," 1991 Conference, August 22-29, 1991, Tokyo, Japan 183365, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae91:183365
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.183365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/183365/files/IAAE-CONF-348.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.183365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Levhari & Leonard J. Mirman, 1980. "The Great Fish War: An Example Using a Dynamic Cournot-Nash Solution," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 11(1), pages 322-334, Spring.
    2. Gordon R. Munro, 1979. "The Optimal Management of Transboundary Renewable Resources," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 12(3), pages 355-376, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gardner Brown, 2000. "Renewable Natural Resource Management and Use Without Markets," Working Papers 0025, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
    2. Florian K. Diekert & Emmi Nieminen, 2017. "International Fisheries Agreements with a Shifting Stock," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 185-211, June.
    3. K. Erdlenbruch & M. Tidball, 2006. "Singular Optimal Control Model of Stock-Dependent Environmental Policies," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 69-88, October.
    4. Paul C. Missios & Charles Plourde, 1996. "The Canada-European Union Turbot War: A Brief Game Theoretic Analysis," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 22(2), pages 144-150, June.
    5. José António Filipe & Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira & Manuel Coelho & Maria Isabel Pedro, 2012. "Cooperation on Stocks Recover," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 2(1), pages 1-74.
    6. Missios, Paul & Plourde, Charles, 1997. "Transboundary Renewable Resource Management and Conservation Motives," MPRA Paper 70748, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Selles Jules & Bonhommeau Sylvain & Guillotreau Patrice & Vallée Thomas, 2020. "Can the Threat of Economic Sanctions Ensure the Sustainability of International Fisheries? An Experiment of a Dynamic Non-cooperative CPR Game with Uncertain Tipping Point," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(1), pages 153-176, May.
    8. McWhinnie, Stephanie F., 2009. "The tragedy of the commons in international fisheries: An empirical examination," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 321-333, May.
    9. Breton, Michèle & Keoula, Michel Yevenunye, 2014. "A great fish war model with asymmetric players," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 209-223.
    10. Kaffine Daniel T & Costello Christopher, 2011. "Unitization of Spatially Connected Renewable Resources," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-31, March.
    11. Manuel Pacheco Coelho & José António Filipe, 2021. "Searching for a New Model of Governance in the High Seas: Game Theory Applied to International Commons Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Richard Horan & James Shortle & Erwin Bulte, 1999. "Renewable Resource Policy When Distributional Impacts Matter," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 14(2), pages 191-215, September.
    13. Marita Laukkanen, 2003. "Transboundary Fisheries Management under Implementation Uncertainty," Working Papers 2003.118, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    14. Ferrara, Ida & Missios, Paul C., 1998. "Non-use values and the management of transboundary renewable resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 281-289, June.
    15. Lone Grønbæk, 2000. "Fishery Economics and Game Theory," Working Papers 14/00, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics.
    16. Pedro Pintassilgo & Lone Kronbak & Marko Lindroos, 2015. "International Fisheries Agreements: A Game Theoretical Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(4), pages 689-709, December.
    17. Gardner M. Brown, 2000. "Renewable Natural Resource Management and Use without Markets," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(4), pages 875-914, December.
    18. TAKARADA Yasuhiro, 2009. "Transboundary Renewable Resource and International Trade," Discussion papers 09041, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    19. Guennady Ougolnitsky & Anatoly Usov, 2019. "Spatially Distributed Differential Game Theoretic Model of Fisheries," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Soltani, Arezoo & Sankhayan, Prem Lall & Hofstad, Ole, 2016. "Playing forest governance games: State-village conflict in Iran," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 251-261.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae91:183365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.