IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae18/277243.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dairy Supply Chain in Southern Brazil: Barriers to Competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Beber, C.L.
  • Ruales Carpio, A.F.
  • Almadani, M.I.

Abstract

Different from other sectors in the Brazilian agriculture, the dairy is still immature, especially regarding external markets competition, and therefore is facing difficult challenges. This study identifies the main factors affecting the competitiveness in one of the most promising and dynamic dairy production areas in the world, the mesoregion Grande Fronteira do Mercosul in Southern Brazil. It is based on the perceptions of supply chain leaders about the challenges to improve the competitiveness. Missing professionalism, formal agreements, investments in marketing and research, technology, development and innovation, technical assistance, high transport and transaction costs, idle capacities and frauds are among the main factors retarding the modernization of this supply chain. It also present different strategies already implemented by some actors to overcome such competitiveness barriers. Therefore these problems and strategies must be the target of managers and authorities in a sustainable common project of development for the benefit of the whole chain. Acknowledgement : We would like to acknowledge the CAPES from the Brazilian Ministry of Education for the financing as well as the interviewees participants of this study for their time and dedication.

Suggested Citation

  • Beber, C.L. & Ruales Carpio, A.F. & Almadani, M.I., 2018. "Dairy Supply Chain in Southern Brazil: Barriers to Competitiveness," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277243, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277243
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277243/files/1447.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James R. Tybout, 2000. "Manufacturing Firms in Developing Countries: How Well Do They Do, and Why?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(1), pages 11-44, March.
    2. Seyoum, Emayenesh & Goddard, Ellen W. & MacLaren, Donald & Griffith, Garry R., 2003. "International Trade In Dairy Products: Processors Market Power," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 58256, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Chaddad, Fabio Ribas, 2007. "Cooperativas No Agronegócio Do Leite: Mudanças Organizacionais E Estratégicas Em Resposta À Globalização," Organizações Rurais e Agroindustriais/Rural and Agro-Industrial Organizations, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Administracao e Economia, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    4. Moctar,Ndiaye & d?Hôtel Elodie,Maitre & Tristan,Le Cotty & Moctar,Ndiaye & d?Hôtel Elodie,Maitre & Tristan,Le Cotty, 2015. "Maize price volatility : does market remoteness matter ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7202, The World Bank.
    5. Key, Nigel & Runsten, David, 1999. "Contract Farming, Smallholders, and Rural Development in Latin America: The Organization of Agroprocessing Firms and the Scale of Outgrower Production," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 381-401, February.
    6. Michael L. Cook, 1995. "The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-Institutional Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(5), pages 1153-1159.
    7. Moctar Ndiaye & Elodie Maître d'Hôtel & Tristan Le Cotty, 2014. "Maize price volatility: does market remoteness matter?," Post-Print hal-02739021, HAL.
    8. Gary J. Young & Martin P. Charns & Stephen M. Shortell, 2001. "Top manager and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: a study of TQM in a public hospital system," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(10), pages 935-951, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caetano Luiz Beber & Greta Langer & Johannes Meyer, 2021. "Strategic Actions for a Sustainable Internationalization of Agri-Food Supply Chains: The Case of the Dairy Industries from Brazil and Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Umair Waqas & Azmawani Abd Rahman & Normaz Wana Ismail & Norazlyn Kamal Basha & Sonia Umair, 2023. "Influence of supply chain risk management and its mediating role on supply chain performance: perspectives from an agri-fresh produce," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1399-1427, May.
    3. Caetano Luiz Beber & Sebastian Lakner & Ioannis Skevas, 2021. "Organizational forms and technical efficiency of the dairy processing industry in Southern Brazil," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tristan Le Cotty & Elodie Maître d'Hôtel & Moctar Ndiaye & Sophie Thoyer, 2016. "Output price risk and fertilizer use decisions in Burkina Faso," Post-Print hal-01419764, HAL.
    2. Caetano Luiz Beber & Greta Langer & Johannes Meyer, 2021. "Strategic Actions for a Sustainable Internationalization of Agri-Food Supply Chains: The Case of the Dairy Industries from Brazil and Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Lemeilleur, Sylvaine & Codron, Jean-Marie, 2011. "Marketing cooperative vs. commission agent: The Turkish dilemma on the modern fresh fruit and vegetable market," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 272-279, April.
    4. Jan Falkowski & Pavel Ciaian, 2016. "Factors Supporting the Development of Producer Organizations and their Impacts in the Light of Ongoing Changes in Food Supply Chains: A Literature Review," JRC Research Reports JRC101617, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Krah, Kwabena, 2023. "Maize price variability, land use change, and forest loss: evidence from Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Kherallah, Mylene & Kirsten, Johann F, 2002. "The New Institutional Economics: Applications For Agricultural Policy Research In Developing Countries," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 41(2).
    7. Sáenz-Segura, Fernando & D'Haese, Marijke & Schipper, Robert A., 2010. "A seasonal model of contracts between a monopsonistic processor and smallholder pepper producers in Costa Rica," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 10-20, January.
    8. Mary Amiti & Jozef Konings, 2007. "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1611-1638, December.
    9. Julia M. Puaschunder, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence Market Disruption," Proceedings of the 13th International RAIS Conference, June 10-11, 2019 01 JP, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    10. Luc Laeven & Christopher Woodruff, 2007. "The Quality of the Legal System, Firm Ownership, and Firm Size," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 89(4), pages 601-614, November.
    11. Houssa, Romain & Verpoorten, Marijke, 2015. "The Unintended Consequence of an Export Ban: Evidence from Benin’s Shrimp Sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 138-150.
    12. Lullit Getachew & Robin C. Sickles, 2007. "The policy environment and relative price efficiency of Egyptian private sector manufacturing: 1987|88-1995|96," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4), pages 703-728.
    13. Viktoria Kocsis & Victoria Shestalova & Henry van der Wiel & Nick Zubanov & Ruslan Lukach & Bert Minne, 2009. "Relation entry, exit and productivity: an overview of recent theoretical and empirical literature," CPB Document 180.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    14. Islam, Asif & Hyland, Marie, 2019. "The drivers and impacts of water infrastructure reliability – a global analysis of manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 143-157.
    15. Jie Bai & Seema Jayachandran & Edmund J Malesky & Benjamin A Olken, 2019. "Firm Growth and Corruption: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(618), pages 651-677.
    16. Tilman Altenburg, 2011. "Can Industrial Policy Work under Neopatrimonial Rule?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-041, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Carmen Pagés-Serra & Reyes Aterido & Mary Hallward-Driemeier, 2007. "Clima de negocios y creación de empleo: El efecto del acceso al crédito, la corrupción y el marco regulatorio en el crecimiento de las empresas," Research Department Publications 4560, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    18. de Carvalho, Antonio Gledson, 2008. "The Effect of Size and Institutional Development on the Growth of Brazilian Firms," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 62(4), December.
    19. Harrison, Ann E. & Lin, Justin Yifu & Xu, Lixin Colin, 2014. "Explaining Africa’s (Dis)advantage," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 59-77.
    20. Abhirup Chakrabarti, 2015. "Organizational adaptation in an economic shock: The role of growth reconfiguration," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(11), pages 1717-1738, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.