IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea02/19811.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stream Water Quality Management: A Stochastic Mixed-Integer Programming Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ali, Md Kamar
  • Fletcher, Jerald J.
  • Phipps, Tim T.

Abstract

Water quality management under the watershed approach of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) programs requires that water quality standards be maintained throughout the year. The main purpose of this research was to develop a methodology that incorporates inter-temporal variations in stream conditions through statistical distributions of pollution loading variables. This was demonstrated through a cost minimization mixed-integer linear programming (MIP) model that maintains the spatial integrity of the watershed problem. Traditional approaches for addressing variability in stream conditions are unlikely to satisfy the assumptions on which these methodologies are founded or are inadequate in addressing the problem correctly when distributions are not normal. The MIP model solves for the location and the maximum capacity of treatment plants to be built throughout the watershed which will provide the optimal level of treatment throughout the year. The proposed methodology involves estimation of parameters of the distribution of pollution loading variables from simulated data and use of those parameters to re-generate a suitable number of random observations in the optimization process such that the new data preserve the same distribution parameters. The objective of the empirical model was to minimize costs for implementing pH TMDLs for a watershed by determining the level of treatment required to attain water quality standards under stochastic stream conditions. The output of the model was total minimum costs for treatment and selection of the spatial pattern of the least-cost technologies for treatment. To minimize costs, the model utilized a spatial network of streams in the watershed, which provides opportunities for cost-reduction through trading of pollution among sources and/or least-cost treatment. The results were used to estimate the costs attributable to inter-temporal variations and the costs of different settings for the 'margin of safety'. The methodology was tested with water quality data for the Paint Creek watershed in West Virginia. The stochastic model included nine streams in the optimal solution. An estimate of inter-temporal variations in stream conditions was calculated by comparing total costs under the stochastic model and a deterministic version of the stochastic model estimated with mean values of the loading variables. It was observed that the deterministic model underestimates total treatment cost by about 45 percent relative to the 97th percentile stochastic model. Estimates of different margin of safety were calculated by comparing total costs for the 99.9th percentile treatment (instead of an idealistic absolute treatment) with that of the 95th to 99th percentile treatment. The differential costs represent the savings due to the knowledge of the statistical distribution of pollution and an explicit margin of safety. Results indicate that treatment costs are about 7 percent lower when the level of assurance is reduced from 99.9 to 99 percent and 21 percent lower when 95 percent assurance is selected. The application of the methodology, however, is not limited to the estimation of TMDL implementation costs. For example, it could be utilized to estimate costs of anti-degradation policies for water quality management and other watershed management issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali, Md Kamar & Fletcher, Jerald J. & Phipps, Tim T., 2002. "Stream Water Quality Management: A Stochastic Mixed-Integer Programming Model," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19811, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea02:19811
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.19811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/19811/files/sp02al04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.19811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sengupta, J K, 1970. "Stochastic Linear Programming with Chance Constraints," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 11(1), pages 101-116, February.
    2. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1963. "Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing under Chance Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 18-39, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Xiaobing & Fletcher, Jerald J., 2004. "An Optimal Control Approach To Water Quality Trading: Cost-Effective Point/Nonpoint Management In A Watershed Framework," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20195, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Zhao, Xiaobing & Fletcher, Jerald J., 2011. "A spatial–temporal optimization approach to watershed management: Acid mine drainage treatment in the Cheat River watershed, WV, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(9), pages 1580-1591.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Saumya Goel, 2014. "A Branch-and-Cut Method for Dynamic Decision Making Under Joint Chance Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1317-1333, May.
    2. Hang Li & Zhe Zhang & Xianggen Yin & Buhan Zhang, 2020. "Preventive Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow with Probabilistic Guarantees," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Wu, Desheng (Dash) & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2010. "Stochastic DEA with ordinal data applied to a multi-attribute pricing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1679-1688, December.
    4. Giada Spaccapanico Proietti & Mariagiulia Matteucci & Stefania Mignani & Bernard P. Veldkamp, 2024. "Chance-Constrained Automated Test Assembly," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(1), pages 92-120, February.
    5. Guigues, Vincent & Juditsky, Anatoli & Nemirovski, Arkadi, 2021. "Constant Depth Decision Rules for multistage optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 223-232.
    6. Bilsel, R. Ufuk & Ravindran, A., 2011. "A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1284-1300, September.
    7. Glover, Fred & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Mahdi Takalloo & Changhyun Kwon, 2019. "On the Price of Satisficing in Network User Equilibria," Papers 1911.07914, arXiv.org.
    9. S. N. Gupta & A. K. Jain & Kanti Swarup, 1987. "Stochastic linear fractional programming with the ratio of independent Cauchy variates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 293-305, April.
    10. Zervopoulos, Panagiotis & Emrouznejad, Ali & Sklavos, Sokratis, 2019. "A Bayesian approach for correcting bias of data envelopment analysis estimators," MPRA Paper 91886, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. R. Caballero & E. Cerda & M. Muñoz & L. Rey, 2002. "Analysis and comparisons of some solution concepts for stochastic programming problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 10(1), pages 101-123, June.
    12. Longsheng Sun & Mark H. Karwan & Changhyun Kwon, 2018. "Generalized Bounded Rationality and Robust Multicommodity Network Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 42-57, 1-2.
    13. Hongmin Li & Stephen C. Graves & Woonghee Tim Huh, 2014. "Optimal Capacity Conversion for Product Transitions Under High Service Requirements," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 46-60, February.
    14. Ali Salmasnia & Mostafa Khatami & Reza Kazemzadeh & Seyed Zegordi, 2015. "Bi-objective single machine scheduling problem with stochastic processing times," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(1), pages 275-297, April.
    15. Fatima Bellahcene, 2019. "Application of the polyblock method to special integer chance constrained problem," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 29(4), pages 23-40.
    16. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim, 2009. "Goal-Driven Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 342-357, April.
    17. Ann M. Campbell & Barrett W. Thomas, 2008. "Probabilistic Traveling Salesman Problem with Deadlines," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Tsionas, Efthymios G. & Papadakis, Emmanuel N., 2010. "A Bayesian approach to statistical inference in stochastic DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 309-314, October.
    19. Shuangchi He & Melvyn Sim & Meilin Zhang, 2019. "Data-Driven Patient Scheduling in Emergency Departments: A Hybrid Robust-Stochastic Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 4123-4140, September.
    20. Alireza Eydi & Leyla Fazli, 2016. "A Multi-Period Multiple Objective Uncertain Programming Model to Allocate Order for Supplier Selection Problem," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(06), pages 1-40, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea02:19811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.