IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/topjnl/v10y2002i1p101-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and comparisons of some solution concepts for stochastic programming problems

Author

Listed:
  • R. Caballero
  • E. Cerda
  • M. Muñoz
  • L. Rey

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse the resolution of Stochastic Programming Problems in which the objective function depends on parameters which are continuous random variables with a known distribution probability. In the literature on these questions different solution concepts have been defined for problems of these characteristics. These concepts are obtained by applying a transformation criterion to the stochastic objective which contains a statistical feature of the objective, implying that for the same stochastic problem there are different optimal solutions available which, in principle, are not comparable. Our study analyses and establishes some relations between these solution concepts.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • R. Caballero & E. Cerda & M. Muñoz & L. Rey, 2002. "Analysis and comparisons of some solution concepts for stochastic programming problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 10(1), pages 101-123, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:topjnl:v:10:y:2002:i:1:p:101-123
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02578943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02578943
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02578943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kall, P., 1982. "Stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 125-130, June.
    2. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1963. "Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing under Chance Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 18-39, February.
    3. Leclercq, J. -P., 1982. "Stochastic programming: An interactive multicriteria approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 33-41, May.
    4. Zare M., Yahia & Daneshmand, Ahmad, 1995. "A linear approximation method for solving a special class of the chance constrained programming problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 213-225, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fatima Bellahcene & Philippe Marthon, 2021. "A compromise solution method for the multiobjective minimum risk problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1913-1926, September.
    2. Emilio Cerdá & Julio Moreno Lorente, 2009. "Chance Constrained Programming with one Discrete Random Variable in Each Constraint," Working Papers 2009-05, FEDEA.
    3. Muñoz, Maria M. & Ruiz, Francisco, 2009. "ISTMO: An interval reference point-based method for stochastic multiobjective programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 25-35, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T Peña & P Lara & C Castrodeza, 2009. "Multiobjective stochastic programming for feed formulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1738-1748, December.
    2. Hang Li & Zhe Zhang & Xianggen Yin & Buhan Zhang, 2020. "Preventive Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow with Probabilistic Guarantees," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Bilsel, R. Ufuk & Ravindran, A., 2011. "A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1284-1300, September.
    4. Glover, Fred & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Zervopoulos, Panagiotis & Emrouznejad, Ali & Sklavos, Sokratis, 2019. "A Bayesian approach for correcting bias of data envelopment analysis estimators," MPRA Paper 91886, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Hongmin Li & Stephen C. Graves & Woonghee Tim Huh, 2014. "Optimal Capacity Conversion for Product Transitions Under High Service Requirements," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 46-60, February.
    7. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim, 2009. "Goal-Driven Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 342-357, April.
    8. Ann M. Campbell & Barrett W. Thomas, 2008. "Probabilistic Traveling Salesman Problem with Deadlines," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Zhengping Liu & Wang Zhang & Hongxian Liu & Guohe Huang & Jiliang Zhen & Xin Qi, 2019. "Characterization of Renewable Energy Utilization Mode for Air-Environmental Quality Improvement through an Inexact Factorial Optimization Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Cigdem Z. Gurgur & Charles T. Morley, 2008. "Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Optimizes Infrastructure Project-Portfolio Selection," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 251-262, August.
    11. O. Olesen, 2006. "Comparing and Combining Two Approaches for Chance Constrained DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 103-119, October.
    12. Gong, Jiangyue & Gujjula, Krishna Reddy & Ntaimo, Lewis, 2023. "An integrated chance constraints approach for optimal vaccination strategies under uncertainty for COVID-19," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    13. Taylan G. Topcu & Konstantinos Triantis, 2022. "An ex-ante DEA method for representing contextual uncertainties and stakeholder risk preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 395-423, February.
    14. Maji, Chandi Charan, 1975. "Intertemporal allocation of irrigation water in the Mayurakshi Project (India): an application of deterministic and chance-constrained linear programming," ISU General Staff Papers 197501010800006381, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Huang, G. H., 1998. "A hybrid inexact-stochastic water management model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 137-158, May.
    16. Kou, Peng & Gao, Feng & Guan, Xiaohong, 2015. "Stochastic predictive control of battery energy storage for wind farm dispatching: Using probabilistic wind power forecasts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 286-300.
    17. Engau, Alexander & Sigler, Devon, 2020. "Pareto solutions in multicriteria optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 357-368.
    18. Yongjia Song & Minjiao Zhang, 2015. "Chance‐constrained multi‐terminal network design problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 321-334, June.
    19. Bora Tarhan & Ignacio Grossmann & Vikas Goel, 2013. "Computational strategies for non-convex multistage MINLP models with decision-dependent uncertainty and gradual uncertainty resolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 141-166, March.
    20. C. Lovell & Shawna Grosskopf & Eduardo Ley & Jesús Pastor & Diego Prior & Philippe Eeckaut, 1994. "Linear programming approaches to the measurement and analysis of productive efficiency," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 2(2), pages 175-248, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:topjnl:v:10:y:2002:i:1:p:101-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.