Innovation Policies and Economic Growth: the Case of Brazil, India and China
AbstractThe high economic growth rates that emerging economies experienced over the last two decades have been studied with great interest by numerous economists. Even during a time of global crisis such as the present one, countries like Brazil, India and China (BICs) continue to achieve high growth rates. Up to the present, the growth strategies adopted by these countries seem to have been effective, with some of them growing at around two digits annual growth rates and showing an enormous impact on international trade. But can the strategies and models adopted so far sustain economic growth in these countries? Is it possible that these countries will face a growth slowdown that will affect not only the welfare of their populations but also many other countries in the world in a time of globalization, unless they move to a different growth strategy? This work analysis of a set of “symptoms” that point to the unsustainability of the current growth models of these economies and, in light of the predictions of endogenous growth models, suggests that technological innovation is the only way to sustain growth in the long run. We also analyse to some extent the degree of awareness of the BICs to the importance of innovation policies by studying a broad set of Science and Technology (S&T) indicators for the BICs, trying in this way to determine their technological profile and whether they are using the international crisis scenario as an opportunity to implement potentially important structural changes.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
This chapter was published in:
This item is provided by Institute of Economic Sciences in its series Book Chapters with number euinpro-4.
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 12 Zmaj Jovina St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
Phone: +381 11 2622 357, 2623 055
Fax: +381 11 2181 471
Web page: http://www.ien.bg.ac.rs
More information through EDIRC
Innovation; economic growth; research and development; science and technology;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- O1 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
- O30 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
- O38 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
- O57 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Paul Romer, 1989.
"Endogenous Technological Change,"
NBER Working Papers
3210, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages S71-102, October.
- Charles I. Jones, 2002.
"Sources of U.S. Economic Growth in a World of Ideas,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association,
American Economic Association, vol. 92(1), pages 220-239, March.
- Jones, C.I., 2000. "Sources of U.S. Economic Growth in a World of Ideas," Papers, United Nations World Employment Programme- 99-29, United Nations World Employment Programme-.
- Charles I. Jones, . "Sources of U.S. Economic Growth in a World of Ideas," Working Papers, Stanford University, Department of Economics 98009, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
- Robert E. Hall & Charles I. Jones, 1999.
"Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?,"
NBER Working Papers
6564, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Robert E. Hall & Charles I. Jones, 1999. "Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 114(1), pages 83-116, February.
- Cheung Kui-yin & Lin, Ping, 2004. "Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 25-44.
- Paul M. Romer, 1994. "The Origins of Endogenous Growth," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 3-22, Winter.
- Barry Bosworth & Susan M. Collins, 2007.
"Accounting for Growth: Comparing China and India,"
NBER Working Papers
12943, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Barry Bosworth & Susan M. Collins, 2008. "Accounting for Growth: Comparing China and India," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 45-66, Winter.
- Samuel de Abreu Pessoa & Fernando de Holanda Barbosa Filho & Fernando A. Veloso, 2008. "Evolução da Produtividade Total dos Fatores na Economia Brasileira com Ênfase no Capital Humano -1992-2006," Anais do XXXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 36th Brazilian Economics Meeting], ANPEC - AssociaÃ§Ã£o Nacional dos Centros de PÃ³sgraduaÃ§Ã£o em Economia [Brazilian Association of G 200807211433140, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pósgraduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zorica Bozic).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.