IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/bsgpks/23.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Österreich 2025: Arbeitszeitverteilung in Österreich. Analyse und Optionen aus Sicht der Arbeitnehmerinnen und Arbeitnehmer

Author

Listed:
  • Huemer, Ulrike
  • Bock-Schappelwein, Julia
  • Famira-Mühlberger, Ulrike
  • Lutz, Hedwig
  • Mayrhuber, Christine

Abstract

Die empirische Evidenz zur Verteilung der Arbeitszeit unselbstständig Beschäftigter in Österreich zeigt eine hohe Heterogenität, insbesondere zwischen Frauen und Männern (Gender-Time-Gap). Grund dafür sind traditionelle Rollenbilder sowie die ungleiche Verteilung der Hausarbeit und der Betreuung von Kindern und Pflegebedürftigen. Die vorliegende Studie liefert arbeitszeitbezogene Ansatzpunkte zur Förderung einer ausgeglichenen Verteilung der Erwerbsarbeitszeit von Frauen und Männern, ebenso wie Maßnahmen für spezifische Lebensphasen, die eine Anpassung der individuellen Erwerbsarbeitszeit zur Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und außerberuflichen Verpflichtungen bzw. Interessen ermöglichen.

Suggested Citation

  • Huemer, Ulrike & Bock-Schappelwein, Julia & Famira-Mühlberger, Ulrike & Lutz, Hedwig & Mayrhuber, Christine, 2017. "Österreich 2025: Arbeitszeitverteilung in Österreich. Analyse und Optionen aus Sicht der Arbeitnehmerinnen und Arbeitnehmer," Sozialpolitische Studienreihe, Government of Austria, Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection, Vienna, volume 23, number 23.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:bsgpks:23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/226684/1/Studienreihe-Bd-23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angelina Keil & Thomas Leoni & Konrad Wolfgang Kallus & Kerstin Gaisbachgrabner, 2011. "Folgekosten langer Arbeitszeiten. Kommentierter Literaturüberblick," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 42411, February.
    2. Andrea Garnero, 2016. "Are part-time workers less productive and underpaid?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 249-249, April.
    3. Ewald Walterskirchen, 2016. "Working Hours in a Period of Low Economic Growth. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 110," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58683, February.
    4. Fagan, Colette. & Lyonette, Clare. & Smith, Mark, & Saldaña-Tejeda, Abril., 2012. "The influence of working time arrangements on work-life integration or 'balance' : a review of the international evidence," ILO Working Papers 994705033402676, International Labour Organization.
    5. repec:ilo:ilowps:470503 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Dominique Anxo & Christine Franz & Angelika Kümmerling, 2013. "Working Time Distribution and Preferences Across the Life Course: A European Perspective," Economia & lavoro, Carocci editore, issue 2, pages 77-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulrike Huemer & Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger & Hedwig Lutz & Christine Mayrhuber, 2017. "Österreich 2025 – Arbeitszeitverteilung in Österreich. Analyse und Optionen aus Sicht der Arbeitnehmerinnen und Arbeitnehmer," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 90(11), pages 865-876, November.
    2. Lott, Yvonne, 2014. "Working time flexibility and autonomy: Facilitating time adequacy? A European perspective," WSI Working Papers 190, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    3. Suzan Lewis & Deirdre Anderson & Clare Lyonette & Nicola Payne & Stephen Wood, 2017. "Public sector austerity cuts in Britain and the changing discourse of work–life balance," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(4), pages 586-604, August.
    4. Ellina Samantroy & Sakshi Khurana, 2016. "Care policies and reconciliation of work and family life: experiences of women workers," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 59(3), pages 363-379, September.
    5. Zhuofei Lu & Senhu Wang & Wendy Olsen, 2023. "Revisiting the ‘flexibility paradox’: degree of work schedule flexibility and time use patterns across gender and occupational groups," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Daniela Campos Ugaz, 2022. "Time precarity at work: nonstandard forms of employment and everyday life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 969-991, November.
    7. Marie Boltz & Bart Cockx & Ana Maria Diaz & Luz Magdalena Salas, 2023. "How does working‐time flexibility affect workers' productivity in a routine job? Evidence from a field experiment," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(1), pages 159-187, March.
    8. Lingling Gao & Yiqun Gan & Amanda Whittal & Sonia Lippke, 2020. "Problematic Internet Use and Perceived Quality of Life: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study Investigating Work-Time and Leisure-Time Internet Use," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger & Stefan Fuchs, 2013. "Unbezahlte Überstunden in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46936, Juni.
    10. Gerold, Stefanie & Nocker, Matthias, 2018. "More Leisure or Higher Pay? A Mixed-methods Study on Reducing Working Time in Austria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 27-36.
    11. Nathalie Greenan & Majda Seghir, 2017. "Measuring Vulnerability to Adverse Working Conditions: Evidence from European Countries [Mesurer la vulnérabilité à la dégradation des conditions de travail dans les pays européens]," Working Papers hal-02172377, HAL.
    12. Boltz, Marie & Cockx, Bart & Diaz, Ana Maria & Salas, Luz Magdalena, 2020. "How does working-time flexibility affect workers’ productivity in a routine job?," ROA Research Memorandum 010, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    13. Murat Darçın, 2016. "Relationship Between Working Condition Quality and Perceived Quality of Society," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(3), pages 1193-1205, December.
    14. Fernando Almeida & Nelson Amoedo, 2021. "Exploring the association between R&D expenditure and the job quality in the European Union," Papers 2101.03214, arXiv.org.
    15. repec:ilo:ilowps:486945 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Renate Ortlieb & Julian Winterheller, 2020. "Behind Migrant and Non‐Migrant Worktime Inequality in Europe: Institutional and Cultural Factors Explaining Differences," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(4), pages 785-815, December.
    17. Chantal Remery & Joop Schippers, 2019. "Work-Family Conflict in the European Union: The Impact of Organizational and Public Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Peter Berg & Gerhard Bosch & Jean Charest, 2014. "Working-Time Configurations," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 67(3), pages 805-837, July.
    19. Lott, Yvonne, 2014. "Flexibilität und Autonomie in der Arbeitszeit: Gut für die Work-Life Balance? Analysen zum Zusammenhang von Arbeitszeitarrangements und Work-Life Balance in Europa," WSI Reports 18, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    20. Messenger, Jon C. & Vidal, Patricia., 2015. "The organization of working time and its effects in the health services sector : a comparative analysis of Brazil, South Africa and the Republic of Korea," ILO Working Papers 994869453402676, International Labour Organization.
    21. Holtmann, Doris & Matiaske, Wenzel, 2021. "Betriebliche Arbeitszeitpolitiken: Exploration in ausgewählten Frauen- und Männerbranchen Ost- und Westdeutschlands," Working Papers 7, Helmut Schmidt University, Research Cluster OPAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:bsgpks:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sozialministerium.at/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.