IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/194587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing concentration of major crops in China from 1980 to 2011

Author

Listed:
  • Yin, Fang
  • Sun, Zhanli
  • You, Liangzhi
  • Müller, Daniel

Abstract

The concentration of crop cultivation can be measured in terms of spatial clustering and of inequality in the distribution of the cropland area. We used official agricultural statistics at the county level (N = 2,354) for each year from 1980 to 2011 for all of China to analyse the changes in spatial clustering and inequality of overall cropland and of the harvested areas of the five major crops (rice, maize, wheat, soybean, and potato). We quantified the spatial clustering with global and local Moran’s I and assessed the inequality in the distribution of crop cultivation with the generalized entropy index. The results showed that the cropland area and harvested areas of the major crops indeed became more homogeneous over time, and the major crops concentrated in fewer areas and in the major historic breadbaskets. Increasing concentration may offer opportunities in specialization and positive agglomeration effects but can reduce the resilience of food systems and agricultural sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin, Fang & Sun, Zhanli & You, Liangzhi & Müller, Daniel, 2018. "Increasing concentration of major crops in China from 1980 to 2011," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(5), pages 480-493.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:194587
    DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2019.1567838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/194587/1/Yin_2018_major_crops_China.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1747423X.2019.1567838?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fujita, Masahisa & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2009. "New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman's 2008 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 109-119, March.
    2. Frayer, Jens & Müller, Daniel & Sun, Zhanli & Munroe, Darla K. & Xu, Jianchu, 2014. "Processes Underlying 50 Years of Local Forest-Cover Change in Yunnan, China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(12), pages 3257-3273.
    3. Shorrocks, Anthony F, 1984. "Inequality Decomposition by Population Subgroups," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(6), pages 1369-1385, November.
    4. Song, Baohui & Marchant, Mary A. & Reed, Michael R. & Xu, Shuang, 2009. "Competitive Analysis and Market Power of China’s Soybean Import Market," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Brulhart, Marius & Traeger, Rolf, 2005. "An account of geographic concentration patterns in Europe," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 597-624, November.
    6. Thisse, Jacques-François & Fujita, Masahisa, 2008. "New Economic Geography: an appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman's 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics," CEPR Discussion Papers 7063, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Li, Zhihui & Deng, Xiangzheng & Yin, Fang & Yang, Cuiyuan, 2015. "Analysis of climate and land use changes impacts on land degradation in the North China Plain," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-11.
    8. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2003:i:7:p:1-6 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Zhang, Man & Jin, Yanhong & Zheng, Fengtian, 2016. "Investigating the “One Farm Household, Two Production systems” in Rural China: The Case of Vegetable and Fruit Farmers," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235959, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Anthony Shorrocks & Guanghua Wan, 2005. "Spatial decomposition of inequality," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 59-81, January.
    11. Jikun Huang & Xiaobing Wang & Huayong Zhi & Zhurong Huang & Scott Rozelle, 2011. "Subsidies and distortions in China’s agriculture: evidence from producer‐level data," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(1), pages 53-71, January.
    12. Kuemmerle, Tobias & Levers, Christian & Erb, Karlheinz & Estel, Stephan & Jepsen, Martin R & Müller, Daniel & Plutzar, Christoph & Stürck, Julia & Verkerk, Pieter J & Verburg, Peter H & Reenberg, Anet, 2016. "Hotspots of land use change in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14.
    13. Fei He & Yaojiang Shi & Renfu Luo & Linxiu Zhang & Natalie Johnson & Scott Rozelle, 2015. "Irrigation investment in China: trends, correlates and impacts," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 344-359, September.
    14. Stéphane Mussard & Michel Terraza & Françoise Seyte, 2003. "Decomposition of Gini and the generalized entropy inequality measures," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(7), pages 1-6.
    15. Erling Li & Ken Coates & Xiaojian Li & Xinyue Ye & Mark Leipnik, 2017. "Analyzing Agricultural Agglomeration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Meng, Erika C.H. & Hu, Ruifa & Shi, Xiaohua & Zhang, Shihuang, 2006. "Maize in China: Production Systems, Constraints, and Research Priorities," Maize Production Systems Papers 7648, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Florencia Granato, 2011. "REGIONAL NEW ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY (refereed paper)," ERSA conference papers ersa10p747, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Alonso-Villar, Olga & del Río, Coral, 2010. "Local versus overall segregation measures," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 30-38, July.
    3. Xiaobing Wang & Jenifer Piesse, 2009. "Welfare Effects of Regressive Taxation and Subsidies in China," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 10809, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    4. repec:ces:ifodic:v:12:y:2014:i:1:p:19108852 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Nicole Palan, 2010. "Measurement of Specialization – The Choice of Indices," FIW Working Paper series 062, FIW.
    6. Kim, Ho Yeon, 2012. "Shrinking population and the urban hierarchy," IDE Discussion Papers 360, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    7. Katarina Bacic & Ivana Rasic Bakaric & Suncana Slijepcevic, 2017. "Sources of productivity differentials in manufacturing in post-transition urban South-East Europe," Working Papers 1706, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    8. Chris Elbers & Peter Lanjouw & Johan Mistiaen & Berk Özler, 2008. "Reinterpreting between-group inequality," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 6(3), pages 231-245, September.
    9. Marques, André M., 2022. "Is income inequality good or bad for growth? Further empirical evidence using data for all Brazilian cities," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 360-376.
    10. Jonathan Jones, 2017. "Agglomeration economies and the location of foreign direct investment: A meta-analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 731-757, November.
    11. Fabien Candau, 2011. "Is Agglomeration Desirable?," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 203-227.
    12. Leonardo Bonilla Mejía, 2011. "Diferencias regionales en la distribución del ingreso en Colombia," Revista Sociedad y Economía, Universidad del Valle, CIDSE, December.
    13. Jiandong Chen & Dai Dai & Ming Pu & Wenxuan Hou & Qiaobin Feng, 2010. "The trend of the Gini coefficient of China," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 10910, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    14. Cattivelli, Valentina, 2020. "Planning peri-urban areas at regional level: The experience of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna," MPRA Paper 101189, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Stéphane Mussard & Françoise Seyte & Michel Terraza, 2006. "La décomposition de l’indicateur de Gini en sous-groupes : une revue de la littérature," Cahiers de recherche 06-11, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    16. Raya Das & Ravi Srivastava, 2021. "Income inequality among agricultural households in India: A regression‐based decomposition analysis," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 1128-1149, August.
    17. Federico Attili, 2020. "Within-between decomposition of the Gini index: a novel proposal," Working Papers wp1153, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    18. Lengyel, Imre & Lengyel, Balázs & Vas, Zsófia & Szakálné Kanó, Izabella, 2016. "Az újraiparosodás térbeli kérdőjelei Magyarországon [Territorial questions of reindustrialization in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 615-646.
    19. José M. Gaspar, 2018. "A prospective review on New Economic Geography," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(2), pages 237-272, September.
    20. Oyama, Daisuke, 2009. "Agglomeration under forward-looking expectations: Potentials and global stability," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 696-713, November.
    21. Kristian Behrens & Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud, 2009. "Krugman's Papers in Regional Science: The 100 dollar bill on the sidewalk is gone and the 2008 Nobel Prize well‐deserved," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 467-489, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:194587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.