IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/market/v33y2021isip47-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Private Label Authenticity: A Two-Study Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Horvat

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business)

  • Tanja Komarac

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business)

  • Durdana Ozretic Dosen

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore further the dimensions of perceived private label authenticity. The aims are threefold. Firstly, to examine how consumers associate the concept of authenticity with manufacturer brands and private labels, comparing their perspectives on the perceived authenticity of manufacturer brands and private labels. secondly, to determine and verify the dimensions that would be appropriate for and specific to measuring private label authenticity. Finally, to offer a model for measuring private label authenticity and test the model empirically. Design/Methodology/Approach – Both qualitative and quantitative research methods were used. Qualitative research was conducted through six focus group interviews. A survey on a convenience sample of 415 respondents from Croatia was applied in the quantitative research phase. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to empirically test the proposed dimensions of the perceived private label authenticity model. Findings and implications – The results of qualitative research demonstrate that consumers have different views of private label authenticity compared to manufacturer brands. Consumers have positive perceptions of private labels, describing them as " a smart choice" and "good-quality products at lower prices". Still, they do not associate them with the notion of authenticity as presented in the existing models. Therefore, a new perceived private label authenticity model is proposed. The quantitative study empirically confirmed its five dimensions: credibility, originality, brand commercialization, trust in the chain, and employee passion. The new proposed model allows retailers to assess private label authenticity using dimensions that are important for private labels as a specific brand type. Additionally, it highlights the importance of trust in the retailer and employee passion as important dimensions of private label authenticity. Limitations – Limitations are related to the methods used in the studies. Participants in all six focus groups were graduate students in economics and business. The survey was done on a convenience sample of respondents. Originality – This paper sheds additional light on extant studies of the perceived brand authenticity construct in the context of private labels and manufacturer brands. Based on qualitative and quantitative research, it proposes a new model of perceived private label authenticity, comprising five dimensions: (1) credibility, (2) originality, (3) brand commercialization, (4) trust in the chain, and (5) employee passion.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Horvat & Tanja Komarac & Durdana Ozretic Dosen, 2021. "Perceived Private Label Authenticity: A Two-Study Analysis," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 33(SI), pages 47-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:33:y:2021:i:si:p:47-66
    DOI: 10.22598/mt/2021.33.spec-issue.47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22598/mt/2021.33.spec-issue.47
    Download Restriction: None
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22598/mt/2021.33.spec-issue.47?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie Guidry Moulard & Randle D. Raggio & Judith Anne Garretson Folse, 2021. "Disentangling the meanings of brand authenticity: The entity-referent correspondence framework of authenticity," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 96-118, January.
    2. van Horen, Femke & Pieters, Rik, 2012. "Consumer evaluation of copycat brands: The effect of imitation type," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 246-255.
    3. Mohammad Muzahid Akbar & Walter Wymer, 2017. "Refining the conceptualization of Brand Authenticity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 14-32, January.
    4. Lassoued, R. & Hobbs, J.E., 2015. "Consumer confidence in credence attributes: The role of brand trust," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 99-107.
    5. Rubio, Natalia & Villaseñor, Nieves & Yagüe, María Jesús, 2017. "Creation of consumer loyalty and trust in the retailer through store brands: The moderating effect of choice of store brand name," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 358-368.
    6. Carsana, Laurence & Jolibert, Alain, 2018. "Influence of iconic, indexical cues, and brand schematicity on perceived authenticity dimensions of private-label brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 213-220.
    7. Cambier, Fanny & Poncin, Ingrid, 2020. "Inferring brand integrity from marketing communications: The effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 260-270.
    8. Daniel Bello & Kwok Leung & Lee Radebaugh & Rosalie L Tung & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2009. "From the Editors: Student samples in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(3), pages 361-364, April.
    9. Bao, Yongchuan & Bao, Yeqing & Sheng, Shibin, 2011. "Motivating purchase of private brands: Effects of store image, product signatureness, and quality variation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 220-226, February.
    10. Fiona Scott Morton & Florian Zettelmeyer, 2004. "The Strategic Positioning of Store Brands in Retailer--Manufacturer Negotiations," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 24(2), pages 161-194, March.
    11. Wu, Paul C.S. & Yeh, Gary Yeong-Yuh & Hsiao, Chieh-Ru, 2011. "The effect of store image and service quality on brand image and purchase intention for private label brands," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 30-39.
    12. Matthews, Lynn & Eilert, Meike & Carlson, Les & Gentry, Jim, 2020. "When and how frontline service employee authenticity influences purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 111-123.
    13. Laurence Carsana & Alain Jolibert, 2018. "Influence of iconic, indexical cues, and brand schematicity on perceived authenticity dimensions of private-label brands," Post-Print hal-01984655, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konuk, Faruk Anıl, 2020. "Trust transfer from manufacturer to private label brand: The moderating role of grocery store format," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Konuk, Faruk Anıl, 2018. "The role of store image, perceived quality, trust and perceived value in predicting consumers’ purchase intentions towards organic private label food," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 304-310.
    3. Hanna Górska-Warsewicz & Sylwia Żakowska-Biemans & Maksymilian Czeczotko & Monika Świątkowska & Dagmara Stangierska & Ewa Świstak & Agnieszka Bobola & Julita Szlachciuk & Karol Krajewski, 2018. "Organic Private Labels as Sources of Competitive Advantage—The Case of International Retailers Operating on the Polish Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    5. Kumar, Prashant & Utkarsh,, 2023. "Effects of in-store information quality and store credibility on consumer engagement in green retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Song, Hanqun & Yang, Huijun & Ma, Emily, 2022. "Restaurants’ outdoor signs say more than you think: An enquiry from a linguistic landscape perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Sheikh Basharul Islam & Suhail Ahmad Bhat & Mushtaq Ahmad Darzi, 2021. "Determining the Influence of Private Labels on Sales of National Brands: A Qualitative Approach," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 133-145, June.
    8. Pelet, Jean-Éric & Durrieu, François & Lick, Erhard, 2020. "Label design of wines sold online: Effects of perceived authenticity on purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    9. Hsin-Hui Lin & Hsien-Ta Li & Yi-Shun Wang & Timmy H. Tseng & Ya-Ling Kao & Min-Yi Wu, 2017. "Predicting customer lifetime value for hypermarket private label products," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 619-635, July.
    10. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & François Bobrie, 2015. "Typicality impact on brand imitations evaluation and categorization," Post-Print halshs-02530211, HAL.
    11. Wu, Lifang & Yang, Wei & Wu, Jessica, 2021. "Private label management: A literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 368-384.
    12. Mahsa Hosseini & Hosseini Norouzi, 2017. "Investigating the impact of consumer trust on loyalty and purchase intention of food store brands: Case study: Palladium shopping mall in Tehran," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 138-146.
    13. Van Horen, Femke & Pieters, Rik, 2013. "Preference reversal for copycat brands: Uncertainty makes imitation feel good," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 54-64.
    14. Adi Alić & Emir Agić & Merima Činjarević, 2017. "The Importance of Store Image and Retail Service Quality in Private Brand Image-Building," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(1), pages 27-42.
    15. Thomas, Veronica L. & Fowler, Kendra, 2023. "Examining the outcomes of influencer activism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Beneke, Justin & Carter, Stephen, 2015. "The development of a consumer value proposition of private label brands and the application thereof in a South African retail context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 22-35.
    17. Maksymilian Czeczotko & Hanna Górska-Warsewicz & Wacław Laskowski & Barbara Rostecka, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Private Labels in an Autonomous Community during COVID-19—Analysis of Consumer Behavior and Perception on the Example of Tenerife," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha, 2020. "Marketing Mix Elements and Corporate Social Responsibility: Do they Really Matter to Store Image?," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(1), pages 56-71, June.
    19. Yu, Luqing & Gao, Zhifeng, 2020. "Better image for better price: how store image affects consumer’s willingness to pay for national brand in different stores," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304625, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Le Roux, André & Bobrie, François & Thébault, Marinette, 2016. "A typology of brand counterfeiting and imitation based on a semiotic approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 349-356.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:33:y:2021:i:si:p:47-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tanja Komarac (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.