IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jeapmx/v20y2018i01ns1464333218500047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Assessment: Electricity Generating Sources Against Energy Efficiency Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Ndala Y. Mulongo

    (School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, PO Box, 524, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa)

  • Pule A. Kholopane

    (School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, PO Box, 524, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

Over the last decade, South Africa has been experiencing a severe electricity supply crisis. Consequently, the stability of the national power grid has been operating under strain. The reason of this crisis was due to insufficient generation capacity as well as an increased demand for electricity. To counteract this situation, the state-owned electricity utility decided to increase its power capacity by building new power plants, and implementing energy efficiency measures to save energy, all of these came at a cost. To date, cost assessment of building new power plants and upgrading the capacity of existing plants has been the focus of various studies over the past decade. Unfortunately, this latter is biased and is not comprehensive because it only considers the costs related to the construction of power plants. Hence, snubbing the costs associated with the implementation of energy efficiency measures is becoming critical to business decision. In light of this, the present study designed a novel cost analysis that includes those blind spots. It is, therefore, believed that the novel model will offer decision makers a more accurate picture of the trade-offs involved in decisions affecting various investments in the electricity sector. To achieve this goal, the novel cost model was tested through various analyses including costs of building power generating plants (coal, gas, nuclear, wind, concentrated solar power, and solar photovoltaic) against costs of implementing energy efficiency measures (residential mass rollouts, standard offer program, standard product program, performance contracting program, and ESCO model mass rollouts), and costs of producing electricity versus costs of saving energy. The results were tested through sensitive analyses, to discount rate, to load factor, and to lifespan. Afterwards, it was demonstrated clearly that energy efficiency measures are least cost option to electricity sector, and they can help to counteract the current electricity supply crisis, delaying the need of building new power plants, and assisting the utility to save Billions of Rand (South African currency) from using large amount of coal, fuel, water, and doing much maintenance to the plants. As far as the author is aware, this study is the first example in the African continent.

Suggested Citation

  • Ndala Y. Mulongo & Pule A. Kholopane, 2018. "Cost Assessment: Electricity Generating Sources Against Energy Efficiency Measures," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:20:y:2018:i:01:n:s1464333218500047
    DOI: 10.1142/S1464333218500047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333218500047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1464333218500047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Branker, K. & Pathak, M.J.M. & Pearce, J.M., 2011. "A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4470-4482.
    2. Zhu, Zhao & Zhang, Da & Mischke, Peggy & Zhang, Xiliang, 2015. "Electricity generation costs of concentrated solar power technologies in China based on operational plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 65-74.
    3. Meier, Alan & Rosenfeld, Arthur H. & Wright, Janice, 1982. "Supply curves of conserved energy for California's residential sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 347-358.
    4. Paul L. Joskow & Donald B. Marron, 1992. "What Does a Negawatt Really Cost? Evidence from Utility Conservation Programs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 41-74.
    5. Fluri, Thomas P., 2009. "The potential of concentrating solar power in South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5075-5080, December.
    6. Joseph Eto & Edward Vine & Leslie Shown & Richard Sonnenblick & Chris Payne, 1996. "The Total Cost and Measured Performance of Utility-Sponsored Energy Efficiency Programs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 31-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ming Fang & Chiu-Lan Chang, 2022. "Nexus between fiscal imbalances, green fiscal spending, and green economic growth: empirical findings from E-7 economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 2423-2443, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Chen, Yu-Long & Thomson, John Douglas, 2017. "Levelized cost of energy modeling for concentrated solar power projects: A China study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 117-127.
    2. Hoffman, Ian M. & Goldman, Charles A. & Rybka, Gregory & Leventis, Greg & Schwartz, Lisa & Sanstad, Alan H. & Schiller, Steven, 2017. "Estimating the cost of saving electricity through U.S. utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Charles A. Goldman & Ian Hoffman & Sean Murphy & Natalie Mims Frick & Greg Leventis & Lisa Schwartz, 2020. "The Cost of Saving Electricity: A Multi-Program Cost Curve for Programs Funded by U.S. Utility Customers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Strupeit, Lars & Neij, Lena, 2017. "Cost dynamics in the deployment of photovoltaics: Insights from the German market for building-sited systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 948-960.
    5. Frondel, Manuel & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2005. "Evaluating environmental programs: The perspective of modern evaluation research," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 515-526, December.
    6. Barbara Praetorius, 1996. "Nachfrageseitiges Marktversagen auf dem Energiemarkt: Empirische Evidenz, theoretische Aspekte, politische Folgerungen," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 65(2), pages 143-155.
    7. Orioli, Aldo & Di Gangi, Alessandra, 2017. "Six-years-long effects of the Italian policies for photovoltaics on the grid parity of grid-connected photovoltaic systems installed in urban contexts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 55-75.
    8. Toshi H. Arimura, Shanjun Li, Richard G. Newell, and Karen Palmer, 2012. "Cost-Effectiveness of Electricity Energy Efficiency Programs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    9. Boogen, Nina & Datta, Souvik & Filippini, Massimo, 2017. "Demand-side management by electric utilities in Switzerland: Analyzing its impact on residential electricity demand," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 402-414.
    10. Kenneth Gillingham & Karen Palmer, 2014. "Bridging the Energy Efficiency Gap: Policy Insights from Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 8(1), pages 18-38, January.
    11. Dan, Atasi & Barshilia, Harish C. & Chattopadhyay, Kamanio & Basu, Bikramjit, 2017. "Solar energy absorption mediated by surface plasma polaritons in spectrally selective dielectric-metal-dielectric coatings: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1050-1077.
    12. de la Rue du Can, Stephane & Leventis, Greg & Phadke, Amol & Gopal, Anand, 2014. "Design of incentive programs for accelerating penetration of energy-efficient appliances," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 56-66.
    13. Dulleck, Uwe & Kaufmann, Sylvia, 2004. "Do customer information programs reduce household electricity demand?--the Irish program," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1025-1032, June.
    14. Haberl, Helmut & Adensam, Heidi & Geissler, Susanne, 1998. "Optimal climate protection strategies for space heating The case of Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(15), pages 1125-1135, December.
    15. Wirl, Franz, 2015. "White certificates — Energy efficiency programs under private information of consumers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 507-515.
    16. Robert Hahn & Robert Metcalfe & Florian Rundhammer, 2020. "Promoting customer engagement: A new trend in utility regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 121-149, January.
    17. Plain, N. & Hingray, B. & Mathy, S., 2019. "Accounting for low solar resource days to size 100% solar microgrids power systems in Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 448-458.
    18. Ramgolam, Yatindra K. & Soyjaudah, K.M.S., 2015. "Unveiling the solar resource potential for photovoltaic applications in Mauritius," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 94-100.
    19. Nathalie Spittler & Ganna Gladkykh & Arnaud Diemer & Brynhildur Davidsdottir, 2019. "Understanding the Current Energy Paradigm and Energy System Models for More Sustainable Energy System Development," Post-Print hal-02127724, HAL.
    20. Arnaud de La Tour & Matthieu Glachant & Yann Ménière, 2013. "What cost for photovoltaic modules in 2020? Lessons from experience curve models," Working Papers hal-00805668, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:20:y:2018:i:01:n:s1464333218500047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jeapm/jeapm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.