IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v54y2007i6p615-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of component commonality on composite assembly policies

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Eynan
  • Meir J. Rosenblatt

Abstract

Assemble in Advance (AIA) policy reduces assembly cost due to advance planning, while Assemble to Order (ATO) policy eliminates assembly of excessive (more than demanded) units. The tradeoffs between the two policies have been studied in the past for single product environments. Moreover, it was shown that it is beneficial to employ AIA and ATO simultaneously. In this article, we study the employment of such a composite assembly policy in a multiproduct environment with component commonality. When common components are used, ATO may also enable us to benefit from the risk pooling effect. We provide important managerial insights such as: the multiperiod problem is myopic and changes in inventory levels due to the use of common components, and demonstrate the potential profit increase compared to other policies.© 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2007

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Eynan & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 2007. "The impact of component commonality on composite assembly policies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(6), pages 615-622, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:54:y:2007:i:6:p:615-622
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20233
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2004. "Note--Commonality Strategies: Value Drivers and Equivalence with Flexible Capacity and Inventory Substitution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 419-424, March.
    2. Yigal Gerchak & Mordechai Henig, 1989. "Component commonality in assemble‐to‐order systems: Models and properties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 61-68, February.
    3. Amit Eynan & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 1995. "Assemble to order and assemble in advance in a single‐period stochastic environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(5), pages 861-872, August.
    4. Moon, Ilkyeong & Choi, Sangjin, 1997. "Distribution free procedures for make-to-order (MTO), make-in-advance (MIA), and composite policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 21-28, January.
    5. Uttarayan Bagchi & Genaro Gutierrez, 1992. "Effect of increasing component commonality on service level and holding cost," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 815-832, October.
    6. Arthur F. Veinott, Jr., 1966. "The Status of Mathematical Inventory Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(11), pages 745-777, July.
    7. Kenneth R. Baker & Michael J. Magazine & Henry L. W. Nuttle, 1986. "The Effect of Commonality on Safety Stock in a Simple Inventory Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(8), pages 982-988, August.
    8. Yigal Gerchak & Michael J. Magazine & A. Bruce Gamble, 1988. "Component Commonality with Service Level Requirements," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 753-760, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Bernstein & Gregory A. DeCroix & Yulan Wang, 2007. "Incentives and Commonality in a Decentralized Multiproduct Assembly System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 630-646, August.
    2. Narendra Agrawal & Morris A. Cohen, 2001. "Optimal material control in an assembly system with component commonality," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(5), pages 409-429, August.
    3. Alex X. Zhang, 1997. "Demand Fulfillment Rates In An Assembleto‐ Order System With Multiple Products And Dependent Demands," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 6(3), pages 309-324, September.
    4. Fernando Bernstein & Gregory A. DeCroix & Yulan Wang, 2011. "The Impact of Demand Aggregation Through Delayed Component Allocation in an Assemble-to-Order System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1154-1171, June.
    5. Mark S. Hillier, 1999. "Product commonality in multiple‐period, make‐to‐stock systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(6), pages 737-751, September.
    6. Jiri Chod & David Pyke & Nils Rudi, 2010. "The Value of Flexibility in Make-to-Order Systems: The Effect of Demand Correlation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 834-848, August.
    7. Fernando Bernstein & Gregory A. DeCroix, 2015. "Advance Demand Information in a Multiproduct System," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 52-65, February.
    8. Hausman, Warren H. & Lee, Hau L. & Zhang, Alex X., 1998. "Joint demand fulfillment probability in a multi-item inventory system with independent order-up-to policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 646-659, September.
    9. Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng & Manikam, Puvaneswari, 2006. "A general framework on the simulation-based optimization under fixed computing budget," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1828-1841, November.
    10. Kim, Kilsun & Chhajed, Dilip, 2000. "Commonality in product design: Cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 602-621, September.
    11. Uttarayan Bagchi & Genaro Gutierrez, 1992. "Effect of increasing component commonality on service level and holding cost," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 815-832, October.
    12. Hsieh, Ying-Jiun, 2011. "Demand switching criteria for multiple products: An inventory cost analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 130-137, April.
    13. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Joseph Geunes, 2000. "Requirements Planning with Substitutions: Exploiting Bill-of-Materials Flexibility in Production Planning," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 166-185, January.
    14. Hillier, Mark S., 2002. "Using commonality as backup safety stock," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 353-365, January.
    15. Yalçın Akçay & Yunke Li & Harihara Prasad Natarajan, 2020. "Category Inventory Planning With Service Level Requirements and Dynamic Substitutions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(11), pages 2553-2578, November.
    16. Wong, Hartanto & Lesmono, Dharma & Chhajed, Dilip & Kim, Kilsun, 2019. "On the evaluation of commonality strategy in product line design: The effect of valuation change and distribution channel structure," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 14-25.
    17. Jing-Sheng Song & Yao Zhao, 2009. "The Value of Component Commonality in a Dynamic Inventory System with Lead Times," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 493-508, March.
    18. Jeet, Vishv & Kutanoglu, Erhan, 2018. "Part commonality effects on integrated network design and inventory models for low-demand service parts logistics systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 46-58.
    19. Stephen A. Smith & Narendra Agrawal, 2000. "Management of Multi-Item Retail Inventory Systems with Demand Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 50-64, February.
    20. Antoine Deza & Kai Huang & Hongfeng Liang & Xiao Jiao Wang, 2018. "On component commonality for periodic review assemble-to-order systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 265(1), pages 29-46, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:54:y:2007:i:6:p:615-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.