IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v51y2004i1p44-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of algorithms for two‐stage flowshops with multi‐processor task flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • George L. Vairaktarakis
  • Chung‐Yee Lee

Abstract

In this article we introduce a 2‐machine flowshop with processing flexibility. Two processing modes are available for each task: namely, processing by the designated processor, and processing simultaneously by both processors. The objective studied is makespan minimization. This production environment is encountered in repetitive manufacturing shops equipped with processors that have the flexibility to execute orders either individually or in coordination. In the latter case, the product designer exploits processing synergies between two processors so as to execute a particular task much faster than a dedicated processor. This type of flowshop environment is also encountered in labor‐intensive assembly lines where products moving downstream can be processed either in the designated assembly stations or by pulling together the work teams of adjacent stations. This scheduling problem requires determining the mode of operation of each task, and the subsequent scheduling that preserves the flowshop constraints. We show that the problem is ordinary NP‐complete and obtain an optimal solution using a dynamic programming algorithm with considerable computational requirements for medium and large problems. Then, we present a number of dynamic programming relaxations and analyze their worst‐case error performance. Finally, we present a polynomial time heuristic with worst‐case error performance comparable to that of the dynamic programming relaxations. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • George L. Vairaktarakis & Chung‐Yee Lee, 2004. "Analysis of algorithms for two‐stage flowshops with multi‐processor task flexibility," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(1), pages 44-59, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:51:y:2004:i:1:p:44-59
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.10104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.10104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chung-Yee Lee & George L. Vairaktarakis, 1997. "Workforce Planning in Mixed Model Assembly Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 553-567, August.
    2. Vairaktarakis, George L. & Cai, Xiaoqiang & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2002. "Workforce planning in synchronous production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(3), pages 551-572, February.
    3. Chung-Yee Lee & Lei Lei & Michael Pinedo, 1997. "Current trends in deterministic scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 70(0), pages 1-41, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Vairaktarakis & Joseph G. Szmerekovsky & Jiayan Xu, 2016. "Level workforce planning for multistage transfer lines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(7), pages 577-590, October.
    2. Delorme, Xavier & Dolgui, Alexandre & Kovalev, Sergey & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2019. "Minimizing the number of workers in a paced mixed-model assembly line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 188-194.
    3. Dolgui, Alexandre & Kovalev, Sergey & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y. & Malyutin, Sergey & Soukhal, Ameur, 2018. "Optimal workforce assignment to operations of a paced assembly line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 200-211.
    4. Zhilan Lou & Wanchen Jie & Shuzhu Zhang, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimization for Order Assignment in Food Delivery Industry with Human Factor Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    5. T.C.E. Cheng & B.M.T. Lin & A. Toker, 2000. "Makespan minimization in the two‐machine flowshop batch scheduling problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 128-144, March.
    6. Steinhofel, K. & Albrecht, A. & Wong, C. K., 1999. "Two simulated annealing-based heuristics for the job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 524-548, November.
    7. Wallace J. Hopp & Eylem Tekin & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2004. "Benefits of Skill Chaining in Serial Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 83-98, January.
    8. Heike, G. & Ramulu, M. & Sorenson, E. & Shanahan, P. & Moinzadeh, K., 2001. "Mixed model assembly alternatives for low-volume manufacturing: The case of the aerospace industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 103-120, July.
    9. Huo, Yumei & Zhao, Hairong, 2015. "Total completion time minimization on multiple machines subject to machine availability and makespan constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 547-554.
    10. Huang, Wei & Chen, Bo, 2007. "Scheduling of batch plants: Constraint-based approach and performance investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 425-444, February.
    11. Waldherr, Stefan & Knust, Sigrid & Briskorn, Dirk, 2017. "Synchronous flow shop problems: How much can we gain by leaving machines idle?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 15-24.
    12. Wu, Lingxiao & Wang, Shuaian, 2018. "Exact and heuristic methods to solve the parallel machine scheduling problem with multi-processor tasks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 26-40.
    13. Sayin, Serpil & Karabati, Selcuk, 2007. "Assigning cross-trained workers to departments: A two-stage optimization model to maximize utility and skill improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1643-1658, February.
    14. Liao, Ching-Jong & Shyur, Der-Lin & Lin, Chien-Hung, 2005. "Makespan minimization for two parallel machines with an availability constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(2), pages 445-456, January.
    15. D Biskup & M Feldmann, 2006. "Lot streaming with variable sublots: an integer programming formulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(3), pages 296-303, March.
    16. Fowler, John W. & Wirojanagud, Pornsarun & Gel, Esma S., 2008. "Heuristics for workforce planning with worker differences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 724-740, November.
    17. Liao, Lu-Wen & Sheen, Gwo-Ji, 2008. "Parallel machine scheduling with machine availability and eligibility constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 458-467, January.
    18. Huo, Yumei & Zhao, Hairong, 2018. "Two machine scheduling subject to arbitrary machine availability constraint," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 128-136.
    19. Xiuli Wang & T. C. Edwin Cheng, 2007. "Machine scheduling with an availability constraint and job delivery coordination," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 11-20, February.
    20. Peng Wu & Junheng Cheng & Feng Chu, 2021. "Large-scale energy-conscious bi-objective single-machine batch scheduling under time-of-use electricity tariffs via effective iterative heuristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 471-494, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:51:y:2004:i:1:p:44-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.