IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v41y2022i2p633-639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Epistemic Necessity And Political Utility: The Role Of Basic Income Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Bru Laín

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bru Laín, 2022. "Between Epistemic Necessity And Political Utility: The Role Of Basic Income Experiments," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 633-639, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:41:y:2022:i:2:p:633-639
    DOI: 10.1002/pam.22384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22384
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pam.22384?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gamel, Claude & Balsan, Didier & Vero, Josiane, 2006. "The impact of basic income on the propensity to work: Theoretical issues and micro-econometric results," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 476-497, June.
    2. Johanna Perkiö & Leire Rincon & Jenna van Draanen, 2019. "Framing Basic Income: Comparing Media Framing of Basic Income in Canada, Finland, and Spain," Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, in: Malcolm Torry (ed.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Basic Income, chapter 0, pages 233-251, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Evelyn L. Forget, 2011. "The Town with No Poverty: The Health Effects of a Canadian Guaranteed Annual Income Field Experiment," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 37(3), pages 283-305, September.
    4. Jurgen De Wispelaere & Antti Halmetoja & Ville-Veikko Pulkka, 2018. "The Rise (and Fall) of the Basic Income Experiment in Finland," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 19(03), pages 15-19, October.
    5. Deaton, Angus & Cartwright, Nancy, 2018. "Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 2-21.
    6. Steven D. Levitt & John A. List, 2007. "What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 153-174, Spring.
    7. Groot Loek, 2006. "Reasons for Launching a Basic Income Experiment," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Claudia Haarmann & Dirk Haarmann & Nicoli Nattrass, 2019. "The Namibian Basic Income Grant Pilot," Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, in: Malcolm Torry (ed.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Basic Income, chapter 0, pages 357-372, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Widerquist, Karl, 2005. "A failure to communicate: what (if anything) can we learn from the negative income tax experiments?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 49-81, February.
    10. Noguera José A. & De Wispelaere Jurgen, 2006. "A Plea for the Use of Laboratory Experiments in Basic Income Research," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Virjo Ilkka, 2006. "A Piece of the Puzzle: A Comment on the Basic Income Experiment Debate," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-5, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marx, Axel & Peeters, Hans, 2008. "An unconditional basic income and labor supply: Results from a pilot study of lottery winners," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1636-1659, August.
    2. Manuela A. de Paz-Báñez & María José Asensio-Coto & Celia Sánchez-López & María-Teresa Aceytuno, 2020. "Is There Empirical Evidence on How the Implementation of a Universal Basic Income (UBI) Affects Labour Supply? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-36, November.
    3. Riutort Sebastià & Julià Albert & Laín Bru, 2023. "Basic Income at Municipal Level: Insights from the Barcelona B-MINCOME Pilot," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, June.
    4. Mohammad Rasoolinejad, 2019. "Universal Basic Income: The Last Bullet in the Darkness," Papers 1910.05658, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    5. Redmond, Paul & McGuinness, Seamus & Ciprikis, Klavs, 2022. "A Universal Basic Income for Ireland: Lessons from the international literature," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS146, June.
    6. Pech Wesley J, 2010. "Behavioral Economics and the Basic Income Guarantee," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Antonio Cabrales & Penélope Hernández & Angel Sánchez, 2020. "Robots, labor markets, and universal basic income," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez‐Gomez & John A. List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 371-432, October.
    9. Robin Maialeh, 2019. "Generalization of results and neoclassical rationality: unresolved controversies of behavioural economics methodology," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 1743-1761, July.
    10. Noguera José A. & De Wispelaere Jurgen, 2006. "A Plea for the Use of Laboratory Experiments in Basic Income Research," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John A. List & Dana L. Suskind, 2017. "What Can We Learn from Experiments? Understanding the Threats to the Scalability of Experimental Results," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 282-286, May.
    12. Berman, Matthew, 2018. "Resource rents, universal basic income, and poverty among Alaska’s Indigenous peoples," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 161-172.
    13. Andor, Mark A. & Gerster, Andreas & Peters, Jörg & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2020. "Social Norms and Energy Conservation Beyond the US," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    14. Peeters Hans & Marx Axel, 2006. "Lottery Games as a Tool for Empirical Basic Income Research," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-7, December.
    15. Wilson, Naomi & McDaid, Shari, 2021. "The mental health effects of a Universal Basic Income: A synthesis of the evidence from previous pilots," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    16. Smith-Carrier Tracy A & Green Steven, 2017. "Another Low Road to Basic Income? Mapping a Pragmatic Model for Adopting a Basic Income in Canada," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Karl Widerquist, 2018. "The Devil’s in the Caveats: A Brief Discussion of the Difficulties of Basic Income Experiments," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 19(03), pages 30-35, October.
    18. Virjo Ilkka, 2006. "A Piece of the Puzzle: A Comment on the Basic Income Experiment Debate," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-5, December.
    19. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John A. List & Danielle LoRe & Dana Suskind, 2017. "Scaling for Economists: Lessons from the Non-Adherence Problem in the Medical Literature," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(4), pages 125-144, Fall.
    20. repec:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:3:p:30-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John List & Claire Mackevicius & Min Sok Lee & Dana Suskind, 2019. "How Can Experiments Play a Greater Role in Public Policy? 12 Proposals from an Economic Model of Scaling," Artefactual Field Experiments 00679, The Field Experiments Website.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:41:y:2022:i:2:p:633-639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.