IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bistud/v1y2006i2n12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Piece of the Puzzle: A Comment on the Basic Income Experiment Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Virjo Ilkka

    (University of Tampere)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Virjo Ilkka, 2006. "A Piece of the Puzzle: A Comment on the Basic Income Experiment Debate," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-5, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:1:y:2006:i:2:n:12
    DOI: 10.2202/1932-0183.1045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1045
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1932-0183.1045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noguera José A. & De Wispelaere Jurgen, 2006. "A Plea for the Use of Laboratory Experiments in Basic Income Research," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Widerquist Karl, 2006. "The Bottom Line in a Basic Income Experiment," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-5, December.
    3. Peeters Hans & Marx Axel, 2006. "Lottery Games as a Tool for Empirical Basic Income Research," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-7, December.
    4. Groot Loek, 2006. "Reasons for Launching a Basic Income Experiment," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marx, Axel & Peeters, Hans, 2008. "An unconditional basic income and labor supply: Results from a pilot study of lottery winners," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1636-1659, August.
    2. Bru Laín, 2022. "Between Epistemic Necessity And Political Utility: The Role Of Basic Income Experiments," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 633-639, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marx, Axel & Peeters, Hans, 2008. "An unconditional basic income and labor supply: Results from a pilot study of lottery winners," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1636-1659, August.
    2. Groot Loek, 2006. "Reasons for Launching a Basic Income Experiment," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Noguera José A. & De Wispelaere Jurgen, 2006. "A Plea for the Use of Laboratory Experiments in Basic Income Research," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Bru Laín, 2022. "Between Epistemic Necessity And Political Utility: The Role Of Basic Income Experiments," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 633-639, March.
    5. Pech Wesley J, 2010. "Behavioral Economics and the Basic Income Guarantee," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Antonio Cabrales & Penélope Hernández & Angel Sánchez, 2020. "Robots, labor markets, and universal basic income," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Legein Thomas & Randour François & Reuchamps Min & Vandeleene Audrey & Heyvaert Pauline & Perrez Julien, 2018. "Framing the Basic Income: An Experimental Study of How Arguments and Metaphors Influence Individuals’ Opinion Formation," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Palermo Kuss, Ana Helena, 2019. "Testing preferences for basic income," The Constitutional Economics Network Working Papers 01-2019, University of Freiburg, Department of Economic Policy and Constitutional Economic Theory.
    9. Manuela A. de Paz-Báñez & María José Asensio-Coto & Celia Sánchez-López & María-Teresa Aceytuno, 2020. "Is There Empirical Evidence on How the Implementation of a Universal Basic Income (UBI) Affects Labour Supply? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-36, November.
    10. Daemen Josette, 2021. "What (If Anything) Can Justify Basic Income Experiments? Balancing Costs and Benefits in Terms of Justice," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 11-25, June.
    11. Jokipalo Veera Amanda, 2019. "Basic Income, Wages, and Productivity: A Laboratory Experiment," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Peeters Hans & Marx Axel, 2006. "Lottery Games as a Tool for Empirical Basic Income Research," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-7, December.
    13. Adrian Little, 2010. "Democratic Melancholy: On the Sacrosanct Place of Democracy in Radical Democratic Theory," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(5), pages 971-987, December.
    14. Riutort Sebastià & Julià Albert & Laín Bru, 2023. "Basic Income at Municipal Level: Insights from the Barcelona B-MINCOME Pilot," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, June.
    15. Kent Grote & Victor Matheson, 2011. "The Economics of Lotteries: An Annotated Bibliography," Working Papers 1110, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:1:y:2006:i:2:n:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.