IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/japmet/v35y2020i7p960-964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fixed effects demeaning in the presence of interactive effects in treatment effects regressions and elsewhere

Author

Listed:
  • Yana Petrova
  • Joakim Westerlund

Abstract

The present paper shows that cross‐section demeaning with respect to time fixed effects is more useful than commonly appreciated, in that it enables consistent and asymptotically normal estimation of interactive effects models with heterogeneous slope coefficients when the number of time periods, T, is small and only the number of cross‐sectional units, N, is large. This is important when using OLS but also when using more sophisticated estimators of interactive effects models whose validity does not require demeaning, a point that to the best of our knowledge has not been made before in the literature. As an illustration, we consider the problem of estimating the average treatment effect in the presence of unobserved time‐varying heterogeneity. Gobillon and Magnac (2016) recently considered this problem. They employed a principal components‐based approach designed to deal with general unobserved heterogeneity, which does not require fixed effects demeaning. The approach does, however, require that T is large, which is typically not the case in practice, and the results reported here confirm that the performance can be extremely poor in small‐T samples. The exception is when the approach is applied to data that have been demeaned with respect to fixed effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Yana Petrova & Joakim Westerlund, 2020. "Fixed effects demeaning in the presence of interactive effects in treatment effects regressions and elsewhere," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 960-964, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:japmet:v:35:y:2020:i:7:p:960-964
    DOI: 10.1002/jae.2790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2790
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jae.2790?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Westerlund, Joakim, 2019. "Testing additive versus interactive effects in fixed-T panels," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 5-8.
    2. Laurent Gobillon & Thierry Magnac, 2016. "Regional Policy Evaluation: Interactive Fixed Effects and Synthetic Controls," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 98(3), pages 535-551, July.
    3. George Kapetanios & Laura Serlenga & Yongcheol Shin, 2019. "Testing for Correlated Factor Loadings in Cross Sectionally Dependent Panels," SERIES 02-2019, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza - Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", revised Jun 2019.
    4. Ahn, Seung C. & Lee, Young H. & Schmidt, Peter, 2013. "Panel data models with multiple time-varying individual effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 1-14.
    5. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2006. "Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 967-1012, July.
    6. Hyungsik Roger Moon & Martin Weidner, 2015. "Linear Regression for Panel With Unknown Number of Factors as Interactive Fixed Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 1543-1579, July.
    7. Marianne Bertrand & Esther Duflo & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004. "How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(1), pages 249-275.
    8. Jushan Bai, 2009. "Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1229-1279, July.
    9. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    10. Robertson, Donald & Sarafidis, Vasilis, 2015. "IV estimation of panels with factor residuals," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 526-541.
    11. Joakim Westerlund, 2019. "On Estimation and Inference in Heterogeneous Panel Regressions with Interactive Effects," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 852-857, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Artūras Juodis, 2022. "A regularization approach to common correlated effects estimation," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 788-810, June.
    2. George Kapetanios & Laura Serlenga & Yongcheol Shin, 2023. "Testing for correlation between the regressors and factor loadings in heterogeneous panels with interactive effects," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 2611-2659, June.
    3. Jie Jiang & Qihang Zhang & Yifan Hui, 2023. "The Impact of Market and Non-Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments on Firms’ Sustainable Technological Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Cheng, Maoyong & Qu, Yang & Jiang, Chunxia & Zhao, Chenchen, 2022. "Is cloud computing the digital solution to the future of banking?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Stauskas, Ovidijus, 2021. "Uniform Theory for CCE under Heterogeneous Slopes and General Unknown Factors," Working Papers 2021:9, Lund University, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Callaway, Brantly & Karami, Sonia, 2023. "Treatment effects in interactive fixed effects models with a small number of time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 184-208.
    2. Susan Athey & Mohsen Bayati & Nikolay Doudchenko & Guido Imbens & Khashayar Khosravi, 2021. "Matrix Completion Methods for Causal Panel Data Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(536), pages 1716-1730, October.
    3. Dmitry Arkhangelsky & Guido Imbens, 2023. "Causal Models for Longitudinal and Panel Data: A Survey," Papers 2311.15458, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    4. Hugo Freeman & Martin Weidner, 2021. "Linear panel regressions with two-way unobserved heterogeneity," CeMMAP working papers CWP39/21, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Hugo Freeman & Martin Weidner, 2021. "Linear Panel Regressions with Two-Way Unobserved Heterogeneity," Papers 2109.11911, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    6. Shi, Wei & Lee, Lung-fei, 2018. "A spatial panel data model with time varying endogenous weights matrices and common factors," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 6-34.
    7. Milda Norkuté & Vasilis Sarafidis & Takashi Yamagata, 2018. "Instrumental Variable Estimation of Dynamic Linear Panel Data Models with Defactored Regressors and a Multifactor Error Structure," ISER Discussion Paper 1019, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    8. Ye, Xiaoqing & Xu, Juan & Wu, Xiangjun, 2018. "Estimation of an unbalanced panel data Tobit model with interactive effects," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 108-123.
    9. De Vos, Ignace & Westerlund, Joakim, 2019. "On CCE estimation of factor-augmented models when regressors are not linear in the factors," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 5-7.
    10. Juodis, Artūras & Karabiyik, Hande & Westerlund, Joakim, 2021. "On the robustness of the pooled CCE estimator," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 325-348.
    11. Norkutė, Milda & Sarafidis, Vasilis & Yamagata, Takashi & Cui, Guowei, 2021. "Instrumental variable estimation of dynamic linear panel data models with defactored regressors and a multifactor error structure," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 416-446.
    12. Jörg Breitung & Philipp Hansen, 2021. "Alternative estimation approaches for the factor augmented panel data model with small T," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 327-351, January.
    13. Wei Shi & Lung-fei Lee, 2018. "The effects of gun control on crimes: a spatial interactive fixed effects approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 233-263, August.
    14. Hyungsik Roger Moon & Martin Weidner, 2018. "Nuclear Norm Regularized Estimation of Panel Regression Models," Papers 1810.10987, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    15. Bai, Jushan & Li, Kunpeng, 2021. "Dynamic spatial panel data models with common shocks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 134-160.
    16. Joakim Westerlund, 2020. "A cross‐section average‐based principal components approach for fixed‐T panels," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(6), pages 776-785, September.
    17. Hsiao, Cheng, 2018. "Panel models with interactive effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 645-673.
    18. Hou, Lei & Li, Kunpeng & Li, Qi & Ouyang, Min, 2021. "Revisiting the location of FDI in China: A panel data approach with heterogeneous shocks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 483-509.
    19. Matthew Harding & Carlos Lamarche & Chris Muris, 2022. "Estimation of a Factor-Augmented Linear Model with Applications Using Student Achievement Data," Papers 2203.03051, arXiv.org.
    20. Jiangtao Duan & Wei Gao & Hao Qu & Hon Keung Tony, 2019. "Subspace Clustering for Panel Data with Interactive Effects," Papers 1909.09928, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:japmet:v:35:y:2020:i:7:p:960-964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0883-7252/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.