IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v9y2019i2p175-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High‐efficiency CO2 capture and separation based on hydrate technology: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Airong Li
  • Jie Wang
  • Buping Bao

Abstract

As a result of growing concerns about global warming, hydrate‐based processing is becoming a promising technology for CO2 capture. This process captures CO2 by forming clathrate hydrates by exposing flue gas to water under suitable conditions. It results in high CO2 recovery due to its large gas‐storage capacity and the large concentration differences between the separation phases. However, the high cost of hydrate formation conditions is the main reason preventing this technology from wide industrial application. To address this issue, this paper explores the literature on the current status of developments in hydrate‐based CO2 capture and separation, focusing on methods to mitigate hydrate formation conditions and to improve phase‐contacting performance. In this review, various relevant aspects of CO2 capture and separation selectivity are summarized, including promoter selection, thermodynamic and kinetic model development, reactor configuration, and process design. Advantages and disadvantages of alternative processes are also discussed. Current studies are limited to laboratory experiments but low energy penalties and high CO2 selectivity features of hydrate processes will make future plant implementation feasible. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Airong Li & Jie Wang & Buping Bao, 2019. "High‐efficiency CO2 capture and separation based on hydrate technology: A review," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 175-193, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:175-193
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1861
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.1861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, Soren T. & Newell, Richard G., 2003. "Prospects for Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies," Discussion Papers 10879, Resources for the Future.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janusz Zdeb & Natalia Howaniec, 2022. "Energy Sector Derived Combustion Products Utilization—Current Advances in Carbon Dioxide Mineralization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-28, November.
    2. Sina Eslami & Behnam Farhangdoost & Hamidreza Shahverdi & Mohsen Mohammadi, 2021. "Surface grafting of silica nanoparticles using 3‐aminopropyl (triethoxysilane) to improve the CO2 absorption and enhance the gas consumption during the CO2 hydrate formation," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(5), pages 939-953, October.
    3. Chun-Gang Xu & Min Wang & Gang Xu & Xiao-Sen Li & Wei Zhang & Jing Cai & Zhao-Yang Chen, 2021. "The Relationship between Thermal Characteristics and Microstructure/Composition of Carbon Dioxide Hydrate in the Presence of Cyclopentane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Liu, Fa-Ping & Li, Ai-Rong & Qing, Sheng-Lan & Luo, Ze-Dong & Ma, Yu-Ling, 2022. "Formation kinetics, mechanism of CO2 hydrate and its applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Chen, Zhaoyang & Fang, Jie & Xu, Chungang & Xia, Zhiming & Yan, Kefeng & Li, Xiaosen, 2020. "Carbon dioxide hydrate separation from Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) syngas by a novel hydrate heat-mass coupling method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Nguyen, Ngoc N. & La, Vinh T. & Huynh, Chinh D. & Nguyen, Anh V., 2022. "Technical and economic perspectives of hydrate-based carbon dioxide capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph E. Aldy & William A. Pizer, 2009. "Issues in Designing U.S. Climate Change Policy," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 179-210.
    2. Vallentin, Daniel, 2007. "Inducing the international diffusion of carbon capture and storage technologies in the power sector," Wuppertal Papers 162, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    3. Goulder, Lawrence H. & Pizer, William A., 2006. "The Economics of Climate Change," RFF Working Paper Series dp-06-06, Resources for the Future.
    4. Parry, Ian W.H. & Fischer, Carolyn & Harrington, Winston, 2004. "Should Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards Be Tightened?," Discussion Papers 10605, Resources for the Future.
    5. Luis Gautier, 2013. "Multilateral and unilateral policy reform of emission taxes and abatement subsidies in a two-country model with oligopolistic interdependence," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 15(1), pages 59-71, January.
    6. Sven Bode & Martina Jung, 2006. "Carbon dioxide capture and storage—liability for non-permanence under the UNFCCC," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 173-186, June.
    7. Scott Barrett, 2008. "The Incredible Economics of Geoengineering," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 39(1), pages 45-54, January.
    8. Herman Vollebergh, 2004. "Lessons from the Polder: Is Dutch CO2-Taxation Optimal?," Working Papers 2004.6, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Christin, Clémence & Nicolai, Jean-Philippe & Pouyet, Jerome, 2011. "The role of abatement technologies for allocating free allowances," DICE Discussion Papers 34, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    10. Harto, Christopher & Meyers, Robert & Williams, Eric, 2010. "Life cycle water use of low-carbon transport fuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 4933-4944, September.
    11. Pizer, William A., 2005. "Climate Policy Design under Uncertainty," Discussion Papers 10584, Resources for the Future.
    12. Vollebergh, Herman R.J., 2008. "Lessons from the polder: Energy tax design in The Netherlands from a climate change perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 660-672, January.
    13. Jaeyoung Han & Jiwoong Jeong & Kyungin Cho & Sangseok Yu, 2018. "A Real-Time Combustion Instability Simulation with Comprehensive Thermo-Acoustic Dynamic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Olajire, Abass A., 2010. "CO2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications – A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2610-2628.
    15. Lutsey, Nicholas P., 2008. "Prioritizing Climate Change Mitigation Alternatives: Comparing Transportation Technologies to Options in Other Sectors," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5rd41433, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Chung, Timothy S. & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia & Johnson, Timothy L., 2011. "Expert assessments of retrofitting coal-fired power plants with carbon dioxide capture technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5609-5620, September.
    17. Scott Barrett, 2009. "The Coming Global Climate-Technology Revolution," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(2), pages 53-75, Spring.
    18. Ali, M.B. & Saidur, R. & Hossain, M.S., 2011. "A review on emission analysis in cement industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2252-2261, June.
    19. Vollebergh, Herman, 2013. "Environmental Taxes and Green Growth," Other publications TiSEM 9efd8e7a-397e-428f-95be-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Filippou, Dimitrios & King, Michael G., 2011. "R&D prospects in the mining and metals industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 276-284, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:175-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.