IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v11y2021i2p297-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility study of CO2/N2 separation intensification on supported ionic liquid membranes by commonly used impregnation methods

Author

Listed:
  • Zenon Ziobrowski
  • Adam Rotkegel

Abstract

This work presents the experimental research on feasible intensification of CO2/N2 separation by utilization of the developed supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs). SILMs were developed through specific impregnation of commercially available ceramic microfiltration/ultrafiltration membranes made by INOPOR and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membranes made by Pervatech BV with chosen imidazolium based ionic liquids (ILs). The effects of operating parameters, impregnation method, and SILM thickness were analyzed. The impregnation was performed by coating and soaking methods at normal pressure and under vacuum. The proper impregnation of the ceramic support, especially in case of commercial PDMS membranes, allows to achieve two distinct, stable, highly selective separation layers. The comparison of separation efficiency of the investigated SILMs shows that SILM based on PDMS membrane prepared by coating with 1‐ethyl‐3‐methylimidazolium acetate ([Emim][Ac]) has very good stability, high CO2/N2 ideal separation factor of 152 and permeability of 2400 barrer. It was found that optimum operating conditions were feed temperature of 20°C and pressure below 200 kPa. The obtained results represent an interesting low cost alternative in the gas separation, especially when the choice of selectivity is the first priority. The comparison with literature data and upper bond Robeson correlation (2008) suggests, that applying an additional active separating IL layer and an appropriate impregnating method to the commercial ceramic membranes may result in significant improvement of separation efficiency. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Zenon Ziobrowski & Adam Rotkegel, 2021. "Feasibility study of CO2/N2 separation intensification on supported ionic liquid membranes by commonly used impregnation methods," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 297-312, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:297-312
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2049
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muriel Cozier, 2019. "Recent developments in carbon capture utilisation and storage," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(4), pages 613-616, August.
    2. Kunalan Shankar & Palanivelu Kandasamy, 2019. "Carbon dioxide separation using α‐alumina ceramic tube supported cellulose triacetate‐tributyl phosphate composite membrane," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 287-305, April.
    3. Xie, Yujiao & Zhang, Yingying & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2014. "Energy consumption analysis for CO2 separation using imidazolium-based ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 325-335.
    4. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Lu, Xiaohua, 2014. "Energy consumption analysis for CO2 separation from gas mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 237-243.
    5. Davison, John, 2007. "Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1163-1176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shuangjun & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Zhao, Ruikai & Yuan, Xiangzhou, 2021. "Thermodynamic carbon pump 2.0: Elucidating energy efficiency through the thermodynamic cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    2. Ma, Chunyan & Xie, Yujiao & Ji, Xiaoyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Modeling, simulation and evaluation of biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride/urea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1269-1283.
    3. Xie, Yujiao & Björkmalm, Johanna & Ma, Chunyan & Willquist, Karin & Yngvesson, Johan & Wallberg, Ola & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic evaluation of biogas upgrading using ionic liquids in comparison with industrially used technology in Scandinavian anaerobic digestion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 742-750.
    4. Xu, Ming-Xin & Wu, Hai-Bo & Wu, Ya-Chang & Wang, Han-Xiao & Ouyang, Hao-Dong & Lu, Qiang, 2021. "Design and evaluation of a novel system for the flue gas compression and purification from the oxy-fuel combustion process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    5. Cheng, Jun & Wang, Yali & Liu, Niu & Hou, Wen & Zhou, Junhu, 2020. "Enhanced CO2 selectivity of mixed matrix membranes with carbonized Zn/Co zeolitic imidazolate frameworks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    6. Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Liu, Yinan & Zhao, Qing & He, Junnan & Zhao, Li, 2017. "Carbon pump: Fundamental theory and applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1131-1143.
    7. Xie, Yujiao & Ma, Chunyan & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2016. "Evaluation of imidazolium-based ionic liquids for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 69-81.
    8. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Choline-based deep eutectic solvents for CO2 separation: Review and thermodynamic analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 436-455.
    9. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Xie, Yujiao & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2 separation from biogas with conventional ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 75-87.
    10. Xiao, Min & Liu, Helei & Gao, Hongxia & Olson, Wilfred & Liang, Zhiwu, 2019. "CO2 capture with hybrid absorbents of low viscosity imidazolium-based ionic liquids and amine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 311-319.
    11. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Xie, Yujiao & Lu, Xiaohua, 2016. "Screening of conventional ionic liquids for carbon dioxide capture and separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1160-1170.
    12. Ibrahim, Muna Hassan & Hayyan, Maan & Hashim, Mohd Ali & Hayyan, Adeeb, 2017. "The role of ionic liquids in desulfurization of fuels: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1534-1549.
    13. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.
    14. Lai, N.Y.G. & Yap, E.H. & Lee, C.W., 2011. "Viability of CCS: A broad-based assessment for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3608-3616.
    15. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    17. Khalilpour, Rajab, 2014. "Multi-level investment planning and scheduling under electricity and carbon market dynamics: Retrofit of a power plant with PCC (post-combustion carbon capture) processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 172-186.
    18. Chu, Fengming & Yang, Lijun & Du, Xiaoze & Yang, Yongping, 2017. "Mass transfer and energy consumption for CO2 absorption by ammonia solution in bubble column," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1068-1080.
    19. Gomes, Gabriel Lourenço & Szklo, Alexandre & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2009. "The impact of CO2 taxation on the configuration of new refineries: An application to Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5519-5529, December.
    20. Nemet, Gregory F. & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2013. "Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts' elicited probabilities under policy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 218-228.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:297-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.