IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wfo/monber/y2010i6p517-528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik 2014 – Positionen und Konsequenzen

Author

Listed:
  • Markus F. Hofreither

    (University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna)

Abstract

Die EU wendet für die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik (GAP) erhebliche Budgetmittel auf: Im Zeitraum 2007/2013 sind für "Erhalt und Management natürlicher Ressourcen" 371,2 Mrd. € vorgesehen. Die Kritiker der GAP sehen diese Ausgaben auf einen Wirtschaftsbereich konzentriert, der weniger als 2% zum BIP der Union beiträgt, Umweltprobleme verursacht und regressive Umverteilungseffekte bewirkt. Für die Befürworter stehen dem die Versorgung der Bevölkerung mit hochwertigen Nahrungsmitteln, die Bereitstellung von öffentlichen Gütern im Bereich von Umwelt, Natur und Landschaftsbild sowie ein wesentlicher Beitrag für die Lebensfähigkeit ländlicher Räume gegenüber. Die bevorstehende GAP-Reform könnte von einer Kürzung der Finanzmittel, politischem Druck auf die Direktzahlungen der ersten Säule und verstärkten Anforderungen im Umweltbereich geprägt sein. Bedingt durch die Pfadabhängigkeit des GAP-Reformprozesses ist mit einer grundlegenden Anpassung dieses Politikbereichs nur bei signifikanter Verringerung des Budgetvolumens zu rechnen.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus F. Hofreither, 2010. "Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik 2014 – Positionen und Konsequenzen," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 83(6), pages 517-528, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2010:i:6:p:517-528
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/39952
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sapir, Andre & Aghion, Philippe & Bertola, Giuseppe & Hellwig, Martin & Pisani-Ferry, Jean & Rosati, Dariusz & Vinals, Jose & Wallace, Helen, 2004. "An Agenda for a Growing Europe: The Sapir Report," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199271498.
    2. Franz Sinabell & Hans Pitlik & Erwin Schmid, 2009. "Zukunft der Finanzierung und Ausgaben der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 36165, February.
    3. Philippidis, G. & Hubbard, L. J., 2001. "The economic cost of the CAP revisited," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 25(2-3), pages 375-385, September.
    4. Catherine Costa & Michelle Osborne & Xiao-guang Zhang & Pierre Boulanger & Patrick Jomini, 2009. "Modelling the Effects of the EU Common Agricultural Policy," Staff Working Papers 0903, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markus F. Hofreither & Franz Sinabell, 2014. "Die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik 2014 bis 2020," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(3), pages 213-222, March.
    2. Weindlmaier, H., 2000. "Die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der deutschen Ernährungsindustrie: Methodische Ansatzpunkte zur Messung und empirische Ergebnisse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 36.
    3. N. N., 2014. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 3/2014," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(3), March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Bertola, 2004. "Creaking Labour Markets: Migrating into Unemployment?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 5(3), pages 48-52, September.
    2. Aschhoff, Birgit & Baier, Elisabeth & Crass, Dirk & Hud, Martin & Hünermund, Paul & Köhler, Christian & Peters, Bettina & Rammer, Christian & Schricke, Esther & Schubert, Torben & Schwiebacher, Franz, 2013. "Innovation in Germany - Results of the German CIS 2006 to 2010. Background report on the Innovation Surveys 2007, 2009 and 2011 of the Mannheim Innovation Panel," ZEW Dokumentationen 13-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. López, Alberto, 2012. "Productivity effects of ICTs and organizational change: A test of the complementarity hypothesis in Spain," MPRA Paper 40400, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Alessandro STERLACCHINI, 2006. "Innovation, Knowledge and Regional Economic Performances: Regularities and Differences in the EU," Working Papers 260, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    5. Bruno Amable, 2009. "The Differentiation of Social Demands in Europe. The Social Basis of the European Models of Capitalism," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 391-426, May.
    6. Stojkoski, Viktor & Karbevski, Marko & Utkovski, Zoran & Basnarkov, Lasko & Kocarev, Ljupco, 2021. "Evolution of cooperation in networked heterogeneous fluctuating environments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    7. Raquel Ortega-Argilés, 2022. "The evolution of regional entrepreneurship policies: “no one size fits all”," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(3), pages 585-610, December.
    8. Jean-Paul Fitoussi & Francesco Saraceno, 2004. "The Brussels-Frankfurt-Washington Consensus. Old and New Tradeoffs in Economics," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2004-02, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    9. Dietmar Harhoff, 2008. "Innovation, Entrepreneurship und Demographie," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(s1), pages 46-72, May.
    10. Marco Buti & Werner Rüger & Alessandro Turrini, 2009. "Is Lisbon Far from Maastricht? Trade-offs and Complementarities between Fiscal Discipline and Structural Reforms," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo, vol. 55(1), pages 165-196, March.
    11. Mojmir MRAK & Vasja RANT, 2006. "Challenges of EU and new member states in financial perspective 2007-2013: convergence and absorption of available cohesion resources," Departmental Working Papers 2006-09, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    12. Eloi Laurent & Jérôme Creel & Jacques Le Cacheux, 2005. "Delegation in Inconsistency : the 'Lisbon Strategy' Record an an Institutional Failure," Sciences Po publications 2005-07, Sciences Po.
    13. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/9769 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Loukas Tsoukalis, 2006. "The JCMS Lecture: Managing Diversity and Change in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Eloi Laurent, 2007. "From Competition to Constitution: Races to Bottoms and the Rise of ‘Shadow’ Social Europe," Sciences Po publications 137, Sciences Po.
    16. Zsolt Darvas & Jean Pisani-Ferry, 2011. "Europe's growth emergency," Policy Contributions 623, Bruegel.
    17. Matthews, Alan & Salvatici, Luca & Scoppola, Margherita, 2017. "Trade Impacts of Agricultural Support in the EU," Commissioned Papers 252767, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    18. Indhira Santos & Susanne Neheider, 2009. "Reframing the EU budget- decision-making process," Working Papers 306, Bruegel.
    19. Massimo Florio & Silvia Vignetti, 2008. "Building a bridge across CBA traditions: the contribution of EU Regional Policy," Working Papers 200908, CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies.
    20. Andrew Hughes Hallett, 2008. "Coordination without Explicit Cooperation: Monetary-Fiscal Interactions in an Era of Demographic Change," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 305, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    21. Seyed Peyman Asadi & Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2019. "Lagging-behind Areas as a Challenge to the Regional Development Strategy: What Insights can New and Evolutionary Economic Geography Offer?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1923, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2019.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2010:i:6:p:517-528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.