IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/unt/jnapdj/v23y2016i1p21-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does product diversification and emphasis on profitability in microfinancing alleviate poverty?

Author

Listed:
  • Gemunu Nanayakkara

    (PhD, Lecturer, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia)

  • Lokman Mia

    (Professor, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia)

Abstract

Microfinancing institutions (MFIs) are likely to change their management policies and focus more on profitability and product diversification as they mature and expand in size because of a number of reasons, including among them, donor pressure and/or lack of funding to expand. The present study empirically tests whether such changes occur in MFIs over time and how these changes affect their performance with regard to alleviating poverty. Using data from a sample of 234 MFIs from around the world, including in the Asia-Pacific region, the study analyses the relationships between age, size, product diversification and emphasis on profitability of MFIs and their impact on the performance in alleviating poverty. Multiple regression techniques and path analysis were used to test the above relationships. The main analysis was also repeated on MFIs in the Asia-Pacific region to assess the relevance of the findings of the main study to the Asia-Pacific region. Results of the main analysis comprising the 234 MFIs in the sample show that MFIs expand in size with age. As MFIs mature, they diversify to offer other services in addition to providing loans (product diversification). However, size acts as a mediating variable in this relationship. Ageing leads to more emphasis on profitability, which, in turn, leads to an improvement in the performance of MFIs in alleviating poverty. However, product diversification has a negative effect on the performance. The more recently established MFIs, which tend to focus only on providing loans, perform better than older ones (see figure 5). The analysis, which was repeated only on the 70 MFIs in the Asia-Pacific region, show similar results to those of the main analysis with one exception. The results generally agree with the main findings that as MFIs grow in size with age, they focus more on profitability and adopt product diversification with this transformation. They also agree that emphasis on profitability leads to an improving performance with regard to alleviating poverty. However, the results show that product diversification by MFIs in the Asia-Pacific region has a positive impact on the performance compared with the negative effect found on the main sample. The findings of this study confirm the shift to commercialism by MFIs over time by emphasizing profitability and product diversification. However, it also indicates that MFIs need be cautious when adopting product diversification strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gemunu Nanayakkara & Lokman Mia, 2016. "Does product diversification and emphasis on profitability in microfinancing alleviate poverty?," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 23(1), pages 21-56, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:unt:jnapdj:v:23:y:2016:i:1:p:21-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/chapter%202.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pitt, M.M. & Khandker, S.R., 1996. "Household and Intrahousehold Impact of the Grameen Bank and Similar Targeted Credit Programs in Bangladesh," World Bank - Discussion Papers 320, World Bank.
    2. World Bank, 2009. "The World Bank Annual Report 2009," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 4354, December.
    3. Evans, David S, 1987. "Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(4), pages 657-674, August.
    4. John Hutchinson & Jozef Konings & Patrick Walsh, 2010. "The Firm Size Distribution and Inter-Industry Diversification," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 37(2), pages 65-82, September.
    5. Khandker, S.R. & Khan, Z. & Khalily, B., 1995. "Sustainability of a Government Targeted Credit Program; Evidence from Bangladesh," World Bank - Discussion Papers 316, World Bank.
    6. Paul Ingram & Joel A. C. Baum, 1997. "Opportunity And Constraint: Organizations’ Learning From The Operating And Competitive Experience Of Industries," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 75-98, July.
    7. World Bank, 2009. "The World Bank Annual Report 2009," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 4356, December.
    8. Luís M B Cabral & José Mata, 2003. "On the Evolution of the Firm Size Distribution: Facts and Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1075-1090, September.
    9. Marguerite S. Robinson, 2001. "The Microfinance Revolution," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 28956, December.
    10. Yaron, J., 1992. "Assessing Development Finance Institutions; A Public Interest Analysis," World Bank - Discussion Papers 174, World Bank.
    11. M S Sriram, 2010. "Commercialisation of Microfinance in India: A Discussion on the Emperor’s Apparel," Working Papers id:2539, eSocialSciences.
    12. Almus, Matthias & Nerlinger, Eric A, 1999. "Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: Which Factors Matter?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 141-154, September.
    13. Hall, Bronwyn H, 1987. "The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 583-606, June.
    14. Gemunu Nanayakkara, 2012. "Measuring the Performance of Microfinancing Institutions: A New Approach," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 13(1), pages 85-104, March.
    15. Takehiko Yasuda, 2005. "Firm Growth, Size, Age and Behavior in Japanese Manufacturing," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Dass, Parshotam, 2000. "Relationship of Firm Size, Initial Diversification, and Internationalization with Strategic Change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 135-146, May.
    17. Montgomery, Cynthia A. & Hariharan, S., 1991. "Diversified expansion by large established firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 71-89, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Coad, 2007. "Firm Growth: a Survey," Post-Print halshs-00155762, HAL.
    2. Blandina Oliveira & Adelino Fortunato, 2006. "Testing Gibrat's Law: Empirical Evidence from a Panel of Portuguese Manufacturing Firms," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 65-81.
    3. Marco Vivarelli, 2013. "Is entrepreneurship necessarily good? Microeconomic evidence from developed and developing countries," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(6), pages 1453-1495, December.
    4. Peter Huber & Harald Oberhofer & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2014. "Job creation and the intra-distribution dynamics of the firm size distribution," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(1), pages 171-197, February.
    5. Blandina Oliveira & Adelino Fortunato, 2017. "Firm growth and R&D: Evidence from the Portuguese manufacturing industry," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 613-627, July.
    6. Gemunu Nanayakkara, 2012. "Measuring the Performance of Microfinancing Institutions: A New Approach," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 13(1), pages 85-104, March.
    7. Sakai, Koji & Uesugi, Iichiro & Watanabe, Tsutomu, 2010. "Firm age and the evolution of borrowing costs: Evidence from Japanese small firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1970-1981, August.
    8. Gavin Reid & Zhibin Xu, 2012. "Generalising Gibrat: using Chinese evidence founded on fieldwork," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1017-1028, November.
    9. Emiliano Santoro, 2006. "Macroeconomic fluctuations and the firms' rate of growth distribution: evidence from UK and US quoted companies," Department of Economics Working Papers 0606, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    10. Coad, Alex & Segarra, Agustí & Teruel, Mercedes, 2013. "Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 173-189.
    11. Geurts, Karen & Van Biesebroeck, Johannes, 2016. "Firm creation and post-entry dynamics of de novo entrants," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 59-104.
    12. Giorgio Fagiolo & Alessandra Luzzi, 2006. "Do liquidity constraints matter in explaining firm size and growth? Some evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 15(1), pages 1-39, February.
    13. Farasat A. S. Bokhari & Franco Mariuzzo & Anna Rita Bennato, 2021. "Innovation and growth in the UK pharmaceuticals: the case of product and marketing introductions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 603-634, June.
    14. Da Silva, Sergio & Matsushita, Raul & Giglio, Ricardo & Massena, Gunther, 2018. "Granularity of the top 1,000 Brazilian companies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 68-73.
    15. Nadine Levratto & Aziza Garsaa & Luc Tessier, 2013. "La Corse est-elle soluble dans le modèle méditerranéen ? Une analyse à partir d’une régression quantile sur données d’entreprises en panel entre 2004 et 2010. Is the Corsican economy a part of the Med," EconomiX Working Papers 2013-20, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    16. Distante, Roberta & Petrella, Ivan & Santoro, Emiliano, 2018. "Gibrat’s law and quantile regressions: An application to firm growth," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 5-9.
    17. Broström, Anders & Baltzopoulos, Apostolos, 2013. "Higher education experiences and new venture performance," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 321, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    18. Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu & Matei Tămășilă & Ilie Mihai Tăucean, 2021. "The Nonlinear Relationship Between Firm Size and Growth in the Automotive Industry," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 445-463, September.
    19. Daria Ciriaci & Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Peter Voigt, 2016. "Innovation and job creation: a sustainable relation?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(2), pages 189-213, August.
    20. D.B. Audretsch & L. Klomp & E. Santarelli & A.R. Thurik, 2004. "Gibrat's Law: Are the Services Different?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 24(3), pages 301-324, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Product diversification; poverty alleviation; performance; microfinancing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unt:jnapdj:v:23:y:2016:i:1:p:21-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Macroeconomic Policy and Development Division, ESCAP (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escapth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.