I examine the changes in poverty and inequality in South Africa during the first 5 years following the end of the apartheid era. First, I construct new, comparable consumption aggregates for 1995 and 2000. Second, using the "cost-of basic-needs" approach, I derive lower-bound (R322, in South African rands) and upper-bound (R593) poverty lines (per capita per month in 2000 prices, adjusted for provincial cost of living differences) for South Africa. I find that real per capita household expenditures declined at the bottom end of the expenditure distribution during this period of low gross domestic product growth. The squared poverty gap significantly increased for most of the relevant range of poverty lines, while the headcount index remained unchanged. Inequality among the African population increased significantly. Even among subgroups of the population that experienced healthy consumption growth, such as coloureds or the Western Cape Province, the rate of poverty reduction was low because the distributional shifts were not pro-poor. I conclude that South Africa needs to grow in a way that also improves the distribution of incomes if it is to make significant progress against poverty in the short to medium run.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Volume (Year): 55 (2007) Issue (Month): 3 (April) Pages: 487-529 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Contact details of provider: Postal: The University of Chicago Press, Journals Division, P.O. Box 37005 Chicago, IL 60637 Fax: (773) 753-0811 Email: Web page: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC/home.html
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Angus Deaton & Alessandro Tarozzi, 2000.
"Prices and poverty in India,"
Working Papers
213, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies..
[Downloadable!]
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)