A general-purpose method for two-group randomization tests
AbstractWe outline a novel approach to calculate exact p-levels for two-sample randomization tests. The approach closely resembles permute in its applications, with the main diﬀerence being that the results are approximated only if the execution time needed to calculate exact p-levels would exceed a speciﬁed maximum. We demonstrate its use by deriving p-levels for the signiﬁcance of Somers’ D, the coefficient of variation, the diﬀerence in means and in medians, and the difference in two multinomials. Copyright 2009 by StataCorp LP.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by StataCorp LP in its journal Stata Journal.
Volume (Year): 9 (2009)
Issue (Month): 1 (March)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.stata-journal.com/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Cheung, Stephen L. & Hedegaard, Morten & Palan, Stefan, 2014.
"To see is to believe: Common expectations in experimental asset markets,"
European Economic Review,
Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 84-96.
- Cheung, Stephen L. & Hedegaard, Morten & Palan, Stefan, 2012. "To See Is To Believe: Common Expectations in Experimental Asset Markets," IZA Discussion Papers 6922, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Cheung, Stephen L. & Hedegaard, Morten & Palan, Stefan, 2012. "To See Is To Believe: Common Expectations In Experimental Asset Markets," Working Papers 2012-10, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
- Daniele Nosenzo & Theo Offerman & Martin Sefton & Ailko van der Veen, 2012. "Discretionary Sanctions and Reward in the Repeated Inspection Game," Discussion Papers 2012-10, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Daniele Nosenzo & Theo Offerman & Martin Sefton & Ailko van der Veen, 2014. "Discretionary Sanctions and Rewards in the Repeated Inspection Game," Discussion Papers 2014-04, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum) or (Lisa Gilmore).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.