IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i8p2351-2364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a variables multiple dependent state sampling plan with simultaneous consideration of process yield and quality loss

Author

Listed:
  • Chien-Wei Wu
  • Zih-Huei Wang

Abstract

Acceptance sampling plans have been utilised predominantly for the inspection of outgoing and incoming lots; these plans provide effective rules to vendors and buyers for making decisions on product acceptance or rejection. Multiple dependent state (MDS) sampling plans have been developed for lot sentencing and are shown to be more efficient than traditional single sampling plans. The decision criteria of MDS sampling plans are based on sample information not only from the current lot but also from preceding lots. In this study, we develop a variables MDS sampling plan for lot sentencing based on the advanced process capability index, which was developed by combining the merits of the yield-based index and loss-based index. The operating characteristic function of the developed plan is derived based on the exact sampling distribution. The determination of plan parameters is formulated as an optimisation model with non-linear constraints, where the objective is to minimise the sample size required for inspection and the constraints are set by the vendor and the buyer to satisfy the desired quality levels and allowable risks. The performance of the developed plan is examined and compared with traditional sampling plans. A step-by-step procedure is provided, and the parameters of the plan under various conditions are tabulated for practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Chien-Wei Wu & Zih-Huei Wang, 2017. "Developing a variables multiple dependent state sampling plan with simultaneous consideration of process yield and quality loss," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(8), pages 2351-2364, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:8:p:2351-2364
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1244360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2016.1244360
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2016.1244360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Govindaraju & S. Balamurali, 1998. "Chain sampling plan for variables inspection," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 103-109.
    2. Wu, Chien-Wei & Pearn, W.L. & Kotz, Samuel, 2009. "An overview of theory and practice on process capability indices for quality assurance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 338-359, February.
    3. Chien-Wei Wu & Zih-Huei Wang & Ming-Hung Shu, 2015. "A lots-dependent variables sampling plan considering supplier’s process loss and buyer’s stipulated specifications requirement," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 6308-6319, October.
    4. Wu, Chien-Wei & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2012. "Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index Cpk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 560-566.
    5. Ikuo Arizono & Akihiro Kanagawa & Hiroshi Ohta & Kyouko Watakabe & Kouji Tateishi, 1997. "Variable sampling plans for normal distribution indexed by Taguchi's loss function," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(6), pages 591-603, September.
    6. Pearn, W.L. & Wu, Chien-Wei, 2007. "An effective decision making method for product acceptance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 12-21, February.
    7. Wu, Chien-Wei, 2012. "An efficient inspection scheme for variables based on Taguchi capability index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 116-122.
    8. Wu, Chien-Wei & Pearn, W.L., 2008. "A variables sampling plan based on Cpmk for product acceptance determination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 549-560, January.
    9. Balamurali, S. & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2007. "Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1221-1230, August.
    10. S. Balamurali & Chi-Hyuck Jun, 2009. "Designing of a variables two-plan system by minimizing the average sample number," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(10), pages 1159-1172.
    11. Ryosuke Tomohiro & Ikuo Arizono & Yasuhiko Takemoto, 2016. "Proposal of variable sequential sampling plan having desired operating characteristics indexed by quality loss," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(19), pages 5742-5760, October.
    12. Seo, J.H. & Jung, M. & Kim, C.M., 2009. "Design of accelerated life test sampling plans with a nonconstant shape parameter," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 659-666, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy H. I. Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    2. Amy Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    3. Chien-Wei Wu & Ming-Hung Shu & Pei-An Wang & Bi-Min Hsu, 2021. "Variables skip-lot sampling plans on the basis of process capability index for products with a low fraction of defectives," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1391-1413, June.
    4. Wu, Chien-Wei & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2012. "Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index Cpk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 560-566.
    5. Wu, Chien-Wei, 2012. "An efficient inspection scheme for variables based on Taguchi capability index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 116-122.
    6. Shih-Wen Liu & Chien-Wei Wu, 2016. "A quick switching sampling system by variables for controlling lot fraction nonconforming," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 1839-1849, March.
    7. Fernández, Arturo J. & Pérez-González, Carlos J. & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2011. "Design of progressively censored group sampling plans for Weibull distributions: An optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 525-532, June.
    8. Lepore, A. & Palumbo, B. & Castagliola, P., 2018. "A note on decision making method for product acceptance based on process capability indices Cpk and Cpmk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 393-398.
    9. Michele Scagliarini, 2022. "A sequential test and a sequential sampling plan based on the process capability index Cpmk," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 1523-1550, July.
    10. Fernández, Arturo J. & Correa-Álvarez, Cristian D. & Pericchi, Luis R., 2020. "Balancing producer and consumer risks in optimal attribute testing: A unified Bayesian/Frequentist design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 576-587.
    11. Li, Der-Chiang & Lin, Liang-Sian, 2013. "A new approach to assess product lifetime performance for small data sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 290-298.
    12. Fernández, Arturo J., 2017. "Economic lot sampling inspection from defect counts with minimum conditional value-at-risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 573-580.
    13. CHEN, Piao & YE, Zhi-Sheng, 2018. "A systematic look at the gamma process capability indices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 589-597.
    14. Muhammad Aslam & Mohammed Albassam, 2019. "Inspection Plan Based on the Process Capability Index Using the Neutrosophic Statistical Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-10, July.
    15. Fernández, Arturo J., 2012. "Minimizing the area of a Pareto confidence region," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 205-212.
    16. Fernández, Arturo J., 2015. "Optimum attributes component test plans for k-out-of-n:F Weibull systems using prior information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 688-696.
    17. Qin, Ruwen & Cudney, Elizabeth A. & Hamzic, Zlatan, 2015. "An optimal plan of zero-defect single-sampling by attributes for incoming inspections in assembly lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 907-915.
    18. Kuen-Suan Chen & Hsi-Tien Chen & Tsang-Chuan Chang, 2017. "The construction and application of Six Sigma quality indices," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(8), pages 2365-2384, April.
    19. Fernández, Arturo J. & Pérez-González, Carlos J., 2012. "Optimal acceptance sampling plans for log-location–scale lifetime models using average risks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 719-731.
    20. Wang, Liang & Wu, Shuo-Jye & Zhang, Chunfang & Dey, Sanku & Tripathi, Yogesh Mani, 2022. "Analysis for constant-stress model on multicomponent system from generalized inverted exponential distribution with stress dependent parameters," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 301-316.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:8:p:2351-2364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.