IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v246y2015i3p907-915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimal plan of zero-defect single-sampling by attributes for incoming inspections in assembly lines

Author

Listed:
  • Qin, Ruwen
  • Cudney, Elizabeth A.
  • Hamzic, Zlatan

Abstract

This paper proposes a nonlinear integer program for determining an optimal plan of zero-defect, single-sampling by attributes for incoming inspections in assembly lines. Individual parts coming to an assembly line differ in the non-conforming (NC) risk, NC severity, lot size, and inspection cost-effectiveness. The proposed optimization model is able to determine the inspection sample size for each of the parts in a resource constrained condition where a product’s NC risk is not a linear combination of NC risks of the individual parts. This paper develops a three-step solution procedure that effectively reduces the solution time for larger size problems commonly seen in assembly lines. The proposed optimization model provides insightful implications for quality management. For example, it reveals the principle of sample size decisions for heterogeneous, dependent parts waiting for incoming inspections; as well as provides a tool for quantifying the expected return from investing additional inspection resources. The optimization model builds a foundation for extensions to advanced inspection sampling plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin, Ruwen & Cudney, Elizabeth A. & Hamzic, Zlatan, 2015. "An optimal plan of zero-defect single-sampling by attributes for incoming inspections in assembly lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 907-915.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:246:y:2015:i:3:p:907-915
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715004658
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omprakash K. Gupta & A. Ravindran, 1985. "Branch and Bound Experiments in Convex Nonlinear Integer Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(12), pages 1533-1546, December.
    2. Markowski, Edward P. & Markowski, Carol A., 2002. "Improved attribute acceptance sampling plans in the presence of misclassification error," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 501-510, June.
    3. Kwei Tang & Robert Plante & Herbert Moskowitz, 1986. "Multiattribute Bayesian Acceptance Sampling Plans Under Nondestructive Inspection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 739-750, June.
    4. Sedat Sami Ercan & M. Zia Hassan & Ajva Taulananda, 1974. "Cost Minimizing Single Sampling Plans with AIQL and AOQL Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(7), pages 1112-1121, March.
    5. Kwei Tang & Jen Tang, 1989. "Design of Product Specifications for Multi-Characteristic Inspection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 743-756, June.
    6. Balamurali, S. & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2007. "Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1221-1230, August.
    7. Ben-Daya, M. & Noman, S.M., 2008. "Integrated inventory and inspection policies for stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 159-169, February.
    8. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Liu, Yu-Te, 2010. "Quality investment and inspection policy in a supplier-manufacturer supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 717-729, May.
    9. Hugo C. Hamaker, 1958. "Some Basic Principles of Sampling Inspection by Attributes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 7(3), pages 149-159, November.
    10. Shin, Sangmun & Kongsuwon, Pauline & Cho, Byung Rae, 2010. "Development of the parametric tolerance modeling and optimization schemes and cost-effective solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1728-1741, December.
    11. Pearn, W.L. & Wu, Chien-Wei, 2007. "An effective decision making method for product acceptance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 12-21, February.
    12. I. D. Hill, 1960. "The Economic Incentive Provided by Sampling Inspection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 9(2), pages 69-81, June.
    13. Fernández, Arturo J. & Pérez-González, Carlos J. & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2011. "Design of progressively censored group sampling plans for Weibull distributions: An optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 525-532, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fernández, Arturo J. & Correa-Álvarez, Cristian D. & Pericchi, Luis R., 2020. "Balancing producer and consumer risks in optimal attribute testing: A unified Bayesian/Frequentist design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 576-587.
    2. Pérez-González, Carlos J. & Fernández, Arturo J. & Kohansal, Akram, 2020. "Efficient truncated repetitive lot inspection using Poisson defect counts and prior information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 964-974.
    3. Fernández, Arturo J., 2017. "Economic lot sampling inspection from defect counts with minimum conditional value-at-risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 573-580.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Chien-Wei & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2012. "Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index Cpk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 560-566.
    2. Amy H. I. Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    3. Fernández, Arturo J., 2012. "Minimizing the area of a Pareto confidence region," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 205-212.
    4. Chien-Wei Wu & Zih-Huei Wang, 2017. "Developing a variables multiple dependent state sampling plan with simultaneous consideration of process yield and quality loss," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(8), pages 2351-2364, April.
    5. Fernández, Arturo J. & Pérez-González, Carlos J., 2012. "Optimal acceptance sampling plans for log-location–scale lifetime models using average risks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 719-731.
    6. Amy Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    7. Wu, Chien-Wei, 2012. "An efficient inspection scheme for variables based on Taguchi capability index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 116-122.
    8. Kutzner, Sarah C. & Kiesmüller, Gudrun P., 2013. "Optimal control of an inventory-production system with state-dependent random yield," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 444-452.
    9. Yu, Hong-Fwu & Yu, Wen-Ching, 2007. "An optimal mixed policy of inspection and burn-in and the optimal production quantity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 483-491, February.
    10. Chien-Wei Wu & Ming-Hung Shu & Pei-An Wang & Bi-Min Hsu, 2021. "Variables skip-lot sampling plans on the basis of process capability index for products with a low fraction of defectives," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1391-1413, June.
    11. Hong Wan & Xiaowei Xu & Tian Ni, 2013. "The incentive effect of acceptance sampling plans in a supply chain with endogenous product quality," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(2), pages 111-124, March.
    12. Chen-Kuo Pai & Tingting Lee & Sangguk Kang, 2021. "Examining the Role of Service Quality, Perceived Values, and Trust in Macau Food Festival," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Fernández, Arturo J. & Pérez-González, Carlos J. & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2011. "Design of progressively censored group sampling plans for Weibull distributions: An optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 525-532, June.
    14. Terzi, Mourad & Ouazene, Yassine & Yalaoui, Alice & Yalaoui, Farouk, 2023. "Lot-sizing and pricing decisions under attraction demand models and multi-channel environment: New efficient formulations," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 10(C).
    15. Lepore, A. & Palumbo, B. & Castagliola, P., 2018. "A note on decision making method for product acceptance based on process capability indices Cpk and Cpmk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 393-398.
    16. David E. Bernal & Zedong Peng & Jan Kronqvist & Ignacio E. Grossmann, 2022. "Alternative regularizations for Outer-Approximation algorithms for convex MINLP," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 807-842, December.
    17. Fernández, Arturo J., 2017. "Economic lot sampling inspection from defect counts with minimum conditional value-at-risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 573-580.
    18. Nasrullah Khan & Talat Yasmin & Muhammad Aslam & Chi-Hyuck Jun, 2018. "On the performance of modified EWMA charts using resampling schemes," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 28(3), pages 29-43.
    19. Liu, Guanmei & Shao, Xiaofeng & Lang, Xiao, 2020. "On the interaction of technology upgrade and buyer entry in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    20. Yoo, Seung Ho & Cheong, Taesu, 2018. "Quality improvement incentive strategies in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 331-342.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:246:y:2015:i:3:p:907-915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.