IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v35y2007i1p12-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An effective decision making method for product acceptance

Author

Listed:
  • Pearn, W.L.
  • Wu, Chien-Wei

Abstract

Acceptance sampling plans are practical tools for quality assurance applications involving quality contract on product orders. The sampling plans provide the vendor and buyer decision rules for product acceptance to meet the preset product quality requirement. As the rapid advancement of manufacturing technology, suppliers require their products to be of high quality with very low fraction of defectives often measured in parts per million. Unfortunately, traditional methods for calculating fraction of defectives no longer work since any sample of reasonable size probably contains no defective product items. In this paper, we introduce an effective sampling plan based on process capability index Cpk to deal with product acceptance determination for low fraction of defectives. The proposed new sampling plan is developed based on the exact sampling distribution rather than approximation. Practitioners can use the proposed method to determine the number of required inspection units, the critical acceptance value, and make reliable decisions in product acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • Pearn, W.L. & Wu, Chien-Wei, 2007. "An effective decision making method for product acceptance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 12-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:35:y:2007:i:1:p:12-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(05)00034-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Palmer & K.-L. Tsui, 1999. "A review and interpretations of process capability indices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 87(0), pages 31-47, April.
    2. Samuel Kotz & Wen Lea Pearn & N. L. Johnson, 1993. "Some Process Capability Indices are More Reliable than One Might Think," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 42(1), pages 55-62, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qin, Ruwen & Cudney, Elizabeth A. & Hamzic, Zlatan, 2015. "An optimal plan of zero-defect single-sampling by attributes for incoming inspections in assembly lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 907-915.
    2. Wu, Chien-Wei & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2012. "Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index Cpk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 560-566.
    3. Chien-Wei Wu & Ming-Hung Shu & Pei-An Wang & Bi-Min Hsu, 2021. "Variables skip-lot sampling plans on the basis of process capability index for products with a low fraction of defectives," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1391-1413, June.
    4. Amy Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    5. Chien-Wei Wu & Zih-Huei Wang, 2017. "Developing a variables multiple dependent state sampling plan with simultaneous consideration of process yield and quality loss," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(8), pages 2351-2364, April.
    6. Amy H. I. Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    7. Muhammad Aslam & Mohammed Albassam, 2019. "Inspection Plan Based on the Process Capability Index Using the Neutrosophic Statistical Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-10, July.
    8. Bouslah, B. & Gharbi, A. & Pellerin, R., 2016. "Integrated production, sampling quality control and maintenance of deteriorating production systems with AOQL constraint," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 110-126.
    9. Lepore, A. & Palumbo, B. & Castagliola, P., 2018. "A note on decision making method for product acceptance based on process capability indices Cpk and Cpmk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 393-398.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Chien-Wei & Pearn, W.L. & Kotz, Samuel, 2009. "An overview of theory and practice on process capability indices for quality assurance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 338-359, February.
    2. Mohammed Z. Anis, 2008. "Basic Process Capability Indices: An Expository Review," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 76(3), pages 347-367, December.
    3. W L Pearn & Y-C Hsu & J-J Horng Shiau, 2007. "Tool replacement policy for one-sided processes with low fraction defective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(8), pages 1075-1083, August.
    4. Shiau, Jyh-Jen Horng & Hung, Hui-Nien & Chiang, Chun-Ta, 1999. "A note on Bayesian estimation of process capability indices," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 215-224, November.
    5. W. L. Pearn, 1998. "New generalization of process capability index Cpk," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 801-810.
    6. Tzong-Ru Tsai & Hua Xin & Ya-Yen Fan & Yuhlong Lio, 2022. "Bias-Corrected Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Bayesian Inference for the Process Performance Index Using Inverse Gaussian Distribution," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Amy H. I. Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    8. Hsi-Tien Chen & Kuen-Suan Chen, 2016. "Assessing the assembly quality of a T-bar ceiling suspension by using an advanced multi-process performance analysis chart with asymmetric tolerance," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 264-283.
    9. Wu, Chien-Wei, 2008. "Assessing process capability based on Bayesian approach with subsamples," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 207-228, January.
    10. Lin G. H. & Pearn W. L., 2003. "Distributions of the Estimated Process Capability Index Cpk," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 263-279, January.
    11. Wu, Chien-Wei, 2009. "Decision-making in testing process performance with fuzzy data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 499-509, March.
    12. Kun-Tzu Yu, 2013. "A measurement model for service capability from the customer perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(4), pages 563-582, December.
    13. Chang, Y.C. & Wu, Chien-Wei, 2008. "Assessing process capability based on the lower confidence bound of Cpk for asymmetric tolerances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 205-227, October.
    14. Lin, Gu-Hong, 2007. "A Bayesian approach based on multiple samples for measuring process performance with incapability index," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 506-512, April.
    15. Amy Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    16. Prasad, Sameer & Bramorski, Tom, 1998. "Robust Process Capability Indices," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 425-435, June.
    17. Pearn, W.L. & Hsu, Ya-Chen, 2007. "Optimal tool replacement for processes with low fraction defective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1116-1129, August.
    18. Rendao Ye & Tiefeng Ma & Songgui Wang, 2011. "Generalized confidence intervals for the process capability indices in general random effect model with balanced data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 153-169, February.
    19. Jessenberger, Jutta & Weihs, Claus, 1998. "A note on a multivariate analogue of the process capability index Cp," Technical Reports 1998,07, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:35:y:2007:i:1:p:12-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.