IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v54y2016i16p4993-5009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Speeding up a Rollout algorithm for complex parallel machine scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Ciavotta
  • Carlo Meloni
  • Marco Pranzo

Abstract

Rollout methodology is a constructive metaheuristic algorithm and its main characteristics are its modularity, the adaptability to different objectives and constraints and the easiness of implementation. Multi-heuristic Rollout extends the Rollout by incorporating several constructive heuristics in the Rollout framework and it is able to easily incorporate human experience inside its research patterns to fulfil complex requirements dictated by the application at hand. However, a drawback for both Rollout and multi-heuristic Rollout is often represented by the required computation time. This paper proposes some alternatives of the full multi-heuristic Rollout algorithm aimed at improving the efficiency by reducing the computational effort while preserving the effectiveness. Namely, we propose dynamic heuristics pruning and candidates reduction strategies. As illustrative case studies, we analyse complex deterministic identical parallel machine scheduling problems showing how Rollout procedures can be used to tackle several additional constraints arising in real contexts. More specifically, we considered both standard (batch production, family set-ups, release, due dates, etc.) and non-standard (machine unavailabilities, maximum campaign size) scheduling constraints. An extensive campaign of computational experiments shows the behaviour of the multi-heuristic Rollout approach and the effectiveness of the different proposed speed-up methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Ciavotta & Carlo Meloni & Marco Pranzo, 2016. "Speeding up a Rollout algorithm for complex parallel machine scheduling," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 4993-5009, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:54:y:2016:i:16:p:4993-5009
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1157276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2016.1157276
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2016.1157276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allahverdi, Ali, 2015. "The third comprehensive survey on scheduling problems with setup times/costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 345-378.
    2. Tang, Christopher S., 1990. "Scheduling batches on parallel machines with major and minor set-ups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 28-37, May.
    3. Stefan Voßs & Andreas Fink & Cees Duin, 2005. "Looking Ahead with the Pilot Method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 285-302, April.
    4. Durk-Jouke van der Zee, 2015. "Family-based dispatching with parallel machines," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(19), pages 5837-5856, October.
    5. Cheng, T. C. E. & Sin, C. C. S., 1990. "A state-of-the-art review of parallel-machine scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 271-292, August.
    6. Lee, Young Hoon & Pinedo, Michael, 1997. "Scheduling jobs on parallel machines with sequence-dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 464-474, August.
    7. Dario Pacciarelli & Carlo Meloni & Marco Pranzo, 2011. "Models and Methods for Production Scheduling in the Pharmaceutical Industry," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Karl G Kempf & Pınar Keskinocak & Reha Uzsoy (ed.), Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise, chapter 0, pages 429-459, Springer.
    8. Carlo Meloni & Dario Pacciarelli & Marco Pranzo, 2004. "A Rollout Metaheuristic for Job Shop Scheduling Problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 215-235, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inanlouganji, Alireza & Pedrielli, Giulia & Reddy, T. Agami & Tormos Aponte, Fernando, 2022. "A computational approach for real-time stochastic recovery of electric power networks during a disaster," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Goodson, Justin C. & Thomas, Barrett W. & Ohlmann, Jeffrey W., 2017. "A rollout algorithm framework for heuristic solutions to finite-horizon stochastic dynamic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 216-229.
    3. Bertazzi, Luca & Secomandi, Nicola, 2018. "Faster rollout search for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands and restocking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 487-497.
    4. Hongjun Wei & Jinjiang Yuan & Yuan Gao, 2019. "Transportation and Batching Scheduling for Minimizing Total Weighted Completion Time," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-10, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goodson, Justin C. & Thomas, Barrett W. & Ohlmann, Jeffrey W., 2017. "A rollout algorithm framework for heuristic solutions to finite-horizon stochastic dynamic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 216-229.
    2. Jun-Ho Lee & Hyun-Jung Kim, 2021. "A heuristic algorithm for identical parallel machine scheduling: splitting jobs, sequence-dependent setup times, and limited setup operators," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 992-1026, December.
    3. Allahverdi, Ali & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Aldowaisan, Tariq, 1999. "A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 219-239, April.
    4. Yanıkoğlu, İhsan & Yavuz, Tonguc, 2022. "Branch-and-price approach for robust parallel machine scheduling with sequence-dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 875-895.
    5. Zhang, Zhe & Song, Xiaoling & Huang, Huijung & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Yin, Yong, 2022. "Logic-based Benders decomposition method for the seru scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup time and DeJong’s learning effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 866-877.
    6. Andrew Lim & Brian Rodrigues & Zhou Xu, 2007. "A m‐parallel crane scheduling problem with a non‐crossing constraint," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 115-127, March.
    7. W L Pearn & S H Chung & M H Yang & Y H Chen, 2004. "Algorithms for the wafer probing scheduling problem with sequence-dependent set-up time and due date restrictions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(11), pages 1194-1207, November.
    8. Allahverdi, Ali, 2016. "A survey of scheduling problems with no-wait in process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 665-686.
    9. Durk-Jouke van der Zee, 2017. "Coordinating batching decisions in manufacturing networks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(18), pages 5405-5422, September.
    10. Yalaoui, F. & Chu, C., 2006. "New exact method to solve the Pm/rj/[summation operator]Cj schedule problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 168-179, March.
    11. Lin, Hung-Tso & Liao, Ching-Jong, 2003. "A case study in a two-stage hybrid flow shop with setup time and dedicated machines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 133-143, November.
    12. Biber Nurit & Mor Baruch & Schlissel Yitzhak & Shapira Dana, 2023. "Lot scheduling involving completion time problems on identical parallel machines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-29, March.
    13. Jianxin Fang & Brenda Cheang & Andrew Lim, 2023. "Problems and Solution Methods of Machine Scheduling in Semiconductor Manufacturing Operations: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-44, August.
    14. Zoltán Varga & Pál Simon, 2014. "Examination Of Scheduling Methods For Production Systems," Advanced Logistic systems, University of Miskolc, Department of Material Handling and Logistics, vol. 8(1), pages 111-120, December.
    15. George L. Vairaktarakis, 2003. "The Value of Resource Flexibility in the Resource-Constrained Job Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 718-732, June.
    16. Anurag Agarwal & Varghese S. Jacob & Hasan Pirkul, 2006. "An Improved Augmented Neural-Network Approach for Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 119-128, February.
    17. Alidaee, Bahram & Kochenberger, Gary A. & Amini, Mohammad M., 2001. "Greedy solutions of selection and ordering problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 203-215, October.
    18. Jacomine Grobler & Andries Engelbrecht & Schalk Kok & Sarma Yadavalli, 2010. "Metaheuristics for the multi-objective FJSP with sequence-dependent set-up times, auxiliary resources and machine down time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 165-196, November.
    19. Meloni, Carlo & Pranzo, Marco & Samà, Marcella, 2022. "Evaluation of VaR and CVaR for the makespan in interval valued blocking job shops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    20. Hesham K. Alfares, 2022. "Plant shutdown maintenance workforce team assignment and job scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 321-338, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:54:y:2016:i:16:p:4993-5009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.