IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v34y2000i2p129-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Clustering of High Technology-based Firms: Opto-electronics in Three Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Hendry
  • James Brown
  • Robert Defillippi

Abstract

HENDRY C., BROWN J. and DEFILLIPPI R. (2000) Regional clustering of high technology-based firms: opto-electronics in three countries, Reg. Studies 34 , 129-144. Industrial districts are seen as generating significant advantages in production and innovation. However, the way concentrations of firms actually relate to one another is often assumed. This paper draws on an international study into the opto-electronics industry to examine the extent and significance of localized inter-company trading and network relationships in six regions. National and international relationships are found to be much stronger than local ones. This is a function of customer and supplier markets, which derive from the technological characteristics of the industry and the way its markets have been created. Such factors are important for understanding the potential for the development of industrial districts in high technology sectors. HENDRY C., BROWN J. et DEFILLIPPI R. (2000) Grappes regionales d'entreprises a la pointe de la technologie: l'optoelectronique dans trois pays, Reg. Studies 34 , 129-144. On considere que les districts industriels entrainent d'importants avantages en termes de production et d'innovation, tout en supposant la facon dont les entreprises se rapportent les unes aux autres. Cet article puise dans une etude internationale de l'industrie de l'optoelectronique afin d'examiner la portee et l'importance des rapports interentreprises et de reseaux, commerciaux et locaux, dans six regions. Il s'avere que les rapports nationaux et internationaux sont beaucoup plus forts que ne le sont les rapports locaux. Cela est fonction des marches de clients et de fournisseurs, qui proviennent des caracteristiques technologiques de l'industrie et de la facon dont ses marches ont ete crees. De tels facteurs sont importants pour une comprehension du potentiel en faveur du developpement des districts industriels dans des secteurs a la pointe de la technologie. HENDRY C., BROWN J. und DEFILLIPPI R. (2000) Regionale Haufung hochtechnologisch gestutzter Firmen: Opto-Elektronik in drei Landern, Reg. Studies 34 , 129-144. Industriegebiete halt man allgemein fur Generatoren bedeutender Vorteile fur Produktion und Innovation. Die Art und Weise wie Firmenkonzentrationen sich tatsachlich zueinander verhalten, beruht jedoch oft auf blosser Annahme. Dieser Aufsatz stutzt sich auf eine internationale Studie der Opto-Elektronikindustrie, um Ausmass und Bedeutung stellenweisen Handels und Netzwerkbeziehungen unter Firmen in sechs Regionen zu untersuchen. Es erweist sich, dass staatliche und internationale Beziehungen weitaus starker sind als ortliche. Dies ist eine Funktion des Marktes mit Angebot und Nachfrage, die sich von den technologischen Merkmalen der Industrie abgeleitet werden und der Art, wie ihre Markte sich entwickelt haben. Derartige Funktionen sind von grosser Bedeutung fur das Verstandnis des Potentials fur Entwicklung von Industriegebieten in Hochtechnologiesektoren.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Hendry & James Brown & Robert Defillippi, 2000. "Regional Clustering of High Technology-based Firms: Opto-electronics in Three Countries," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 129-144.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:2:p:129-144
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400050006050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400050006050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400050006050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott, Allen J., 1995. "The Geographic Foundations of Industrial Performance," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 319-320, December.
    2. Swann, Peter & Prevezer, Martha, 1996. "A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 1139-1157, October.
    3. Cristiano Antonelli, 1996. "Localized knowledge percolation processes and information networks," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 281-295.
    4. Freeman, Chris, 1995. "The 'National System of Innovation' in Historical Perspective," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(1), pages 5-24, February.
    5. Russo, Margherita, 1985. "Technical change and the industrial district: The role of interfirm relations in the growth and transformation of ceramic tile production in Italy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 329-343, December.
    6. Dosi, Giovanni, 1993. "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories : A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 102-103, April.
    7. Lorenzoni, Gianni & Ornati, Oscar A., 1988. "Constellations of firms and new ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 41-57.
    8. Solinas, Giovanni, 1982. "Labour Market Segmentation and Workers' Careers: The Case of the Italian Knitwear Industry," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(4), pages 331-352, December.
    9. Giovanni Dosi, 1984. "Technical Change and Industrial Transformation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-17521-5, September.
    10. Allen Kaufman & Ross Gittell & Michael Merenda & William Naumes & Craig Wood, 1994. "Porter's Model for Geographic Competitive Advantage: The Case of New Hampshire," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 8(1), pages 43-66, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    2. Li Xiao & David North, 2017. "The graduation performance of technology business incubators in China’s three tier cities: the role of incubator funding, technical support, and entrepreneurial mentoring," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 615-634, June.
    3. Christian Schröder, 2014. "Dynamics in ICT cooperation networks in selected German ICT clusters," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 197-230, February.
    4. Manuel Portugal Ferreira & Ana Teresa Tavares & William Hesterly & Sungu Armagan, 2006. "Network and firm antecedents of spin-offs: Motherhooding spin-offs," FEP Working Papers 201, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    5. Frederic Gaschet & Mathieu Becue & Vanessa Bouaroudj & Marina Flamand & André Meunie & Guillaume Pouyanne & Damien Talbot, 2017. "Related variety and the dynamics of European photonic clusters," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 1292-1315, August.
    6. Marina Geenhuizen, 2007. "Modelling dynamics of knowledge networks and local connectedness: a case study of urban high-tech companies in The Netherlands," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 41(4), pages 813-833, December.
    7. Isabel Diez-Vial & Marta Fernández-Olmos, 2017. "The effect of science and technology parks on a firm’s performance: a dynamic approach over time," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 413-434, July.
    8. Adelheid Holl & Rafael Pardo & Ruth Rama, 2010. "Just-in-Time Manufacturing Systems, Subcontracting and Geographic Proximity," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 519-533.
    9. Adele Parmentola, 2017. "Matching Local and Global Dimensions: A Knowledge Based Approach to Classify European Life Sciences Clusters," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, August.
    10. James Simmie, 2004. "Innovation and Clustering in the Globalised International Economy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(5-6), pages 1095-1112, May.
    11. Stanko, Michael A. & Olleros, Xavier, 2013. "Industry growth and the knowledge spillover regime: Does outsourcing harm innovativeness but help profit?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2007-2016.
    12. Loris Servillo & Rob Atkinson & Abdelillah Hamdouch & Aiqi Wu & Cassandra C. Wang, 2017. "Knowledge Search Pattern and Product Innovation of Firms in Low and High-Technology Industrial Clusters: A Knowledge Relatedness Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(4), pages 488-502, September.
    13. Xiyao Xiang & Wei-Chiao Huang, 2019. "Does Distance Affect the Role of Nonlocal Subsidiaries on Cluster Firms’ Innovation? An Empirical Investigation on Chinese Biotechnology Cluster Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Díez-Vial, Isabel & Montoro-Sánchez, Ángeles, 2020. "International gatekeepers: How to integrate domestic networks and international relations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    15. Barbara Jankowska, 2010. "Internacjonalizacja klastrów," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5-6, pages 19-40.
    16. David A. Wolfe & Meric S. Gertler, 2004. "Clusters from the Inside and Out: Local Dynamics and Global Linkages," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(5-6), pages 1071-1093, May.
    17. Angela da Rocha & Beatriz Kury & Joana Monteiro, 2009. "The Role of Flagship Firms, External Actors and Support Institutions in the Emergence of Successful Export Activities in Brazil: Two Industrial Cluster Studies," Research Department Publications 3270, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    18. Maria Bengtsson & Anders Soderholm, 2002. "Bridging Distances: Organizing Boundary-spanning Technology Development Projects," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 263-274.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip McCready, 2001. "City-regional Systems and Competitive Internet Economies," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 16(2), pages 103-122, May.
    2. Ciarli, Tommaso & Ràfols, Ismael, 2019. "The relation between research priorities and societal demands: The case of rice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 949-967.
    3. Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013. "Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Ramani, Shyama V. & Thutupalli, Ajay, 2015. "Emergence of controversy in technology transitions: Green Revolution and Bt cotton in India," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 198-212.
    5. Tsao, J.Y. & Boyack, K.W. & Coltrin, M.E. & Turnley, J.G. & Gauster, W.B., 2008. "Galileo's stream: A framework for understanding knowledge production," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 330-352, March.
    6. Davide Consoli, 2005. "Changing boundaries and structure of a technological system: lessons from UK retail banking," Industrial Organization 0506006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Giovanni Dosi & Richard Nelson, 2013. "The Evolution of Technologies: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 3(1), pages 3-46, June.
    8. Jorge Nogueira de Paiva Britto & Leonardo Costa Ribeiro & Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque, 2021. "Global systems of innovation: introductory notes on a new layer and a new hierarchy in innovation systems," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2-3), pages 259-279, September.
    9. Andrea Coveri & Mario Pianta, 2019. "The Structural Dynamics of Income Distribution:Technology, Wages and Profits," Working Papers 1901, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2019.
    10. Sydow, Jörg & Müller-Seitz, Gordon, 2020. "Open innovation at the interorganizational network level – Stretching practices to face technological discontinuities in the semiconductor industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Enrico Santarelli, 2004. "Patents and the Technological Performance of District Firms Evidence for the Emilia-Romagna Region of Italy," Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy 2004-29, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group.
    12. Rinaldo Evangelista, 2018. "Technology and Economic Development: The Schumpeterian Legacy," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 136-153, March.
    13. Mário Luiz Possas & Esther Dweck, 2005. "A Multisectoral Micro-Macrodynamic Model," Working Papers 0012, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Department of Economics.
    14. Rakas, Marija & Hain, Daniel S., 2019. "The state of innovation system research: What happens beneath the surface?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    15. Dosi, Giovanni & Grazzi, Marco & Mathew, Nanditha, 2017. "The cost-quantity relations and the diverse patterns of “learning by doing”: Evidence from India," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1873-1886.
    16. Bhupatiraju, Samyukta & Nomaler, Önder & Triulzi, Giorgio & Verspagen, Bart, 2012. "Knowledge flows – Analyzing the core literature of innovation, entrepreneurship and science and technology studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1205-1218.
    17. Juan Carlos Salazar-Elena & M. Paloma Sánchez & F. Javier Otamendi, 2016. "A Non-Parametric Delphi Approach to Foster Innovation Policy Debate in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269.
    19. Ronnie Ramlogan & Andrea Mina & Gindo Tampubolon & J. Stanley Metcalfe, 2007. "Networks of knowledge: The distributed nature of medical innovation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(2), pages 459-489, February.
    20. R. Boschma, 1996. "The window of locational opportunity-concept," Working Papers 260, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:2:p:129-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.